Correlation-Aware Example Selection for In-Context Learning with Nonsymmetric Determinantal Point Processes (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Qiunan Du, Zhiliang Tian, Zhen Huang, Kailun Bian, Tianlun Liu, Zhaoning Zhang, Xinwang Liu, Feng Liu, Dongsheng Li
| Challenge: | Existing studies on in-context learning (ICL) focus on the selection of individual examples and ignore correlations among examples. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to capture positive and negative correlations using the determinantal point process . they optimize the method via kernel decomposition-based MLE to fit a constructed pseudo-labeled dataset . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms baselines in ICL example selection. |
Similar Papers
Effective Demonstration Annotation for In-Context Learning via Language Model-Based Determinantal Point Process (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on large-scale labeled support sets are not feasible in practical scenarios. |
| Approach: | They introduce a language model-based determinant point process that considers uncertainty and diversity of unlabeled instances for optimal selection. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can effectively select canonical examples on 9 NLU and 2 Generation datasets. |
Coverage-based Example Selection for In-Context Learning (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In-context learning (ICL) is a training-free paradigm of fewshot inference that can generalize to novel tasks by conditioning on a few task examples. |
| Approach: | They show that BERTScore-Recall (BSR) selects better examples that demonstrate more of the salient aspects of the test input. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms methods that leverage task or LLM-specific training on compositional tasks. |
Representative Demonstration Selection for In-Context Learning with Two-Stage Determinantal Point Process (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods tend to select different demonstrations for each test instance, which is time-consuming and poses limitations in practical scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose to select a representative subset of in-context demonstrations that can prompt different test instances in a specific task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can be used to generate representative in-context demonstrations. |
In-Context Learning with Iterative Demonstration Selection (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing literature has highlighted the importance of selecting examples that are diverse or semantically similar to the test sample . Existing studies have shown that the optimal selection dimension, i.e., diversity or similarity, is task-specific. |
| Approach: | They propose to use zero-shot chain-of-thought reasoning to iteratively select examples that are diverse but still strongly correlated with the test sample as ICL demonstrations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing demonstration selection methods on reasoning, question answering, and topic classification tasks. |
C-ICL: Contrastive In-context Learning for Information Extraction (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for in-context learning with large language models focus on using correct or negative examples, ignoring the potential value of incorrect or negative samples. |
| Approach: | They propose a few-shot technique that leverages both correct and incorrect sample constructions to create in-context learning demonstrations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed technique outperforms previous few-shot in-context learning methods on a broad spectrum of related tasks. |
LLMs are Better Than You Think: Label-Guided In-Context Learning for Named Entity Recognition (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Named Entity Recognition (NER) tasks are performed using only a few demonstrations. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that leverages training labels through token-level statistics to improve ICL performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing methods on five NER datasets and is robust in low-resource settings. |
Submodular-based In-context Example Selection for LLMs-based Machine Translation (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior studies have focused on the role of well-chosen examples in in-context learning . |
| Approach: | They propose to use multiple translational factors for in-context example selection by using monotone submodular function maximization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms random selection and robust single-factor baselines across various NLP tasks. |
Structured Semantic Information Helps Retrieve Better Examples for In-Context Learning Applied to Few-Shot Relation Extraction (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to relation extraction require many training examples per relation, resulting in low results. |
| Approach: | They propose a strategy where new examples are selected based on their similarity to the provided 1-shot example. |
| Outcome: | The proposed strategy outperforms other methods on FS-TACRED and FS - FewRel subsets and achieves state-of-the-art performance on both datasets. |
TABGEN-ICL: Residual-Aware In-Context Example Selection for Tabular Data Generation (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to tabular data generation require fine-tuning, which is computationally expensive. |
| Approach: | They propose a new in-context learning framework to prompt a fixed LLM with in-constitut examples to enhance the in-text learning ability of LLMs for tabular data generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms random selection strategies on five real-world tabular datasets and reduces error rate by 42.2% on fidelity metric. |
TISE: A Tripartite In-context Selection Method for Event Argument Extraction (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that LLMs can finish inference by providing several examples. |
| Approach: | They propose a method which integrates three requirements when selecting an in-context example and integrates them into a set of determinantal point processes to enhance the reasoning capabilities of LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can achieve superior performance with fewer examples and outperform some supervised methods. |