Challenge: Evaluation and Management (E/M) coding is performed by physicians and trained human coders who review clinical encounter notes and electronic health record data to assign appropriate codes.
Approach: They propose a framework that automates evaluation and management coding tasks using the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) taxonomy.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves an increase in coding accuracy of more than 36% over a commercial CPT E/M coding system and almost 5% over our strongest single-prompt baseline.

Similar Papers

Toward Reliable Clinical Coding with Language Models: Verification and Lightweight Adaptation (2025.emnlp-industry)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for clinical code verification fail to account for hierarchical misalignments . standardized coding systems such as ICD-10-CM1 ensure consistency across medical records.
Approach: They propose to use prompt engineering and small-scale fine-tuning to improve accuracy without the computational overhead of search-based methods.
Outcome: The proposed task is a standalone task and a pipeline component to address hierarchical near-miss errors without the computational overhead of search-based methods.
Navigating the Modern Evaluation Landscape: Considerations in Benchmarks and Frameworks for Large Language Models (LLMs) (2024.lrec-tutorials)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: General-purpose Language Models have changed the world of Natural Language Processing, if not the world itself.
Approach: This tutorial will lay the foundations and explain the basics of evaluation and compare traditional methods to newly developed methods.
Outcome: The tutorial assumes little familiarity with metrics, datasets, prompts and benchmarks . it will compare traditional methods to newly developed methods .
LLMEval-Med: A Real-world Clinical Benchmark for Medical LLMs with Physician Validation (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current medical benchmarks have limitations in question design, data sources and evaluation methods.
Approach: They propose a new benchmark covering five core medical areas . it includes 2,996 questions created from real-world electronic health records .
Outcome: The proposed model covers five core medical areas and includes 2,996 questions created from real-world electronic health records and expert-designed clinical scenarios.
Measuring What Matters: Evaluating Ensemble LLMs with Label Refinement in Inductive Coding (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) are prone to inconsistencies and individual biases, limiting their reliability.
Approach: They propose a framework that combines ensemble methods with code refinement methodology to address these challenges.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms large language models and LLMs with a low-rank averaging and a moderator-based mechanism to simulate human consensus.
From Scores to Steps: Diagnosing and Improving LLM Performance in Evidence-Based Medical Calculations (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing benchmarks assess only the final answer with a wide numerical tolerance, overlooking systematic reasoning failures and potentially causing serious clinical misjudgments.
Approach: They propose a new step-by-step evaluation pipeline that assesses formula selection, entity extraction, and arithmetic computation.
Outcome: The proposed method improves the accuracy of large language models on medical benchmarks from 16.35% to 53.19%.
CPTCoder: A Reliable LLM System for Medical Procedure Code Prediction (2026.acl-demo)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Clinical procedure coding is an extreme multi-label classification problem . CPTCoder predicts standardized medical procedure codes from clinical text .
Approach: a new human-in-the-loop system predicts standardized medical procedure codes from clinical text.
Outcome: CPTCoder outperforms baseline system by 12 and 5 points in a clinical procedure classification problem.
From Tools to Teammates: Evaluating LLMs in Multi-Session Coding Interactions (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models excel at solving individual problems in isolation, but are they able to effectively collaborate over long-term interactions?
Approach: They propose to use a multi-session dataset to test LLMs' ability to track and execute simple coding instructions amid irrelevant information, simulating a realistic setting.
Outcome: The proposed model performs poorly when instructions are spread across sessions, suggesting that they are not able to integrate information over long interactions.
Text Annotation via Inductive Coding: Comparing Human Experts to LLMs in Qualitative Data Analysis (2025.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Qualitative data analysis (QDA) is an important research method across fields such as marketing, media studies, social science, psychology, medical research, and others.
Approach: They evaluate the performance of open-source LLMs by comparing them to human experts.
Outcome: The proposed method is based on inductive coding using large language models.
A Systematic Survey and Critical Review on Evaluating Large Language Models: Challenges, Limitations, and Recommendations (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained significant attention due to their capabilities in performing diverse tasks across domains.
Approach: They review the primary challenges and limitations causing inconsistencies in evaluations . early models could generate coherent text but limited to simple tasks .
Outcome: The proposed evaluations are reproducible, reliable, and robust.
CliMedBench: A Large-Scale Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Medical Large Language Models in Clinical Scenarios (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Chinese medical large language models (LLMs) are underperforming on this benchmark, especially where medical reasoning and factual consistency are vital.
Approach: They propose a benchmark with 14 expert-guided clinical scenarios to assess the medical ability of large language models across 7 pivot dimensions.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark has been validated in several ways.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations