Text Annotation via Inductive Coding: Comparing Human Experts to LLMs in Qualitative Data Analysis (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Qualitative data analysis (QDA) is an important research method across fields such as marketing, media studies, social science, psychology, medical research, and others. |
| Approach: | They evaluate the performance of open-source LLMs by comparing them to human experts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is based on inductive coding using large language models. |
Similar Papers
Measuring What Matters: Evaluating Ensemble LLMs with Label Refinement in Inductive Coding (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are prone to inconsistencies and individual biases, limiting their reliability. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that combines ensemble methods with code refinement methodology to address these challenges. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms large language models and LLMs with a low-rank averaging and a moderator-based mechanism to simulate human consensus. |
Are LLMs Better than Reported? Detecting Label Errors and Mitigating Their Effect on Model Performance (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities to enhance the annotation process, particularly for detecting label errors in existing datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose to use an ensemble of large language models to flag mislabeled examples by using an LLM-as-a-judge approach to detect label errors in existing datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves label accuracy and consistency in large language models. |
HICode: Hierarchical Inductive Coding with LLMs (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for fine-grained corpus analysis are limited to small subsets and require manual labeling and statistical tools like topic modeling. |
| Approach: | They propose a pipeline that inductively generates labels from analysis data and then hierarchically clusters them to surface emergent themes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipeline validates the approach across three datasets and shows it is robust through automated and human evaluations. |
The Promises and Pitfalls of LLM Annotations in Dataset Labeling: a Case Study on Media Bias Detection (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Tomáš Horych, Christoph Mandl, Terry Ruas, Andre Greiner-Petter, Bela Gipp, Akiko Aizawa, Timo Spinde
| Challenge: | Recent research suggests using Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the annotation process, reducing these costs while maintaining data quality. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Large Language Models to automate annotation process and train classifiers on large datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms all of the annotator LLMs on two media bias benchmark datasets (BABE and BASIL) while maintaining data quality. |
MEGAnno+: A Human-LLM Collaborative Annotation System (2024.eacl-demo)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) can label data faster and cheaper than humans . however, they may fall short in understanding of complex contexts, leading to incorrect labels . |
| Approach: | They propose a collaborative approach where humans and LLMs work together to produce reliable labels. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system can produce reliable and high-quality labels faster and cheaper than humans . compared to traditional models, it can generate labels faster, at a lower cost . |
Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Survey (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Zhen Tan, Dawei Li, Song Wang, Alimohammad Beigi, Bohan Jiang, Amrita Bhattacharjee, Mansooreh Karami, Jundong Li, Lu Cheng, Huan Liu
| Challenge: | Existing surveys focus on LLMs' specific utility for data annotation and synthesis. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models to generate annotations from raw data . they also propose to review learning strategies for models utilizing LLM-generated annotations . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can be used to improve the efficacy of machine learning models by generating and labeling raw data with relevant information. |
GMEG-EXP: A Dataset of Human- and LLM-Generated Explanations of Grammatical and Fluency Edits (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work has explored the ability of large language models (LLMs) to generate explanations of existing labeled data. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset to examine the ability of large language models to explain revisions in sentences by comparing human- and LLM-generated explanations of grammatical and fluency edits to a human evaluation criteria. |
| Outcome: | The proposed explanations address grammatical and fluency edits and are compared with a dataset built from the GMEG (Grammarly Multi-domain Evaluation for GEC) dataset. |
Exploring the Reliability of Large Language Models as Customized Evaluators for Diverse NLP Tasks (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work uses large language models (LLMs) to evaluate natural language process tasks, but there are shortcomings in current LLMs. |
| Approach: | They examine the alignment between LLM evaluators and human annotators by comparing conventional and alignment tasks with different evaluation criteria. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models excel in general criteria, such as fluency, but face challenges with complex criteria, including numerical reasoning. |
Linguistic and Embedding-Based Profiling of Texts Generated by Humans and Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have focused on using LLMs to classify text as either human-written or machine-generated . |
| Approach: | They characterize human-written and machine-generated texts using a set of linguistic features across different linguistic levels such as morphology, syntax, and semantics. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model reveals that human-written texts exhibit simpler syntactic structures and more diverse semantic content. |
The LLM Effect: Are Humans Truly Using LLMs, or Are They Being Influenced By Them Instead? (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models have shown capabilities close to human performance in various analytical tasks. |
| Approach: | They investigate the efficiency and accuracy of Large Language Models in specialized tasks . they integrate LLMs with expert annotators to observe the impact of LLM suggestions . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves task completion speed but introduces anchoring bias . the proposed model is not suitable for open-ended analysis, but is capable of handling specialized tasks. |