Transferring Textual Preferences to Vision-Language Understanding through Model Merging (2025.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large vision-language models (LVLMs) perform outstandingly across multimodal tasks, but training them with preference data is computationally expensive. |
| Approach: | They propose to merge text-based reward models with LVLMs to create visionlanguage reward models (VLRMs) this approach offers an efficient method for incorporating textual preferences into LVRMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves over LVLMs’ scoring and text-based RMs, and offers an efficient method for incorporating textual preferences into LVRMs. |
Similar Papers
EffiVLM-BENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Training-Free Acceleration in Large Vision-Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for accelerating Large Vision-Language Models lack comprehensive evaluation across diverse backbones, benchmarks, and metrics. |
| Approach: | They propose EffiVLM-BENCH framework for evaluating absolute performance and generalization and loyalty. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework offers insights into optimal strategies for accelerating LVLMs. |
Self-Rewarding Large Vision-Language Models for Optimizing Prompts in Text-to-Image Generation (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for rewriting text-to-image models require specialized vocabulary . a new approach uses large vision language models to optimize text-based models . |
| Approach: | They propose a prompt optimization framework that rephrases a user prompt into a text-to-image model by using large vision language models as solver and reward model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models on two popular datasets. |
Centurio: On Drivers of Multilingual Ability of Large Vision-Language Model (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Gregor Geigle, Florian Schneider, Carolin Holtermann, Chris Biemann, Radu Timofte, Anne Lauscher, Goran Glavaš
| Challenge: | Existing models for large vision-language tasks are trained on English data, which makes them struggle to understand non-English input and fail to generate output in the desired target language. |
| Approach: | They conduct multi-stage experiments on 13 vision-language tasks and 43 languages . they find that one can include as many as 100 training languages simultaneously with as little as 25-50% of non-English data . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models in 14 tasks and 56 languages. |
Towards Cross-Lingual Explanation of Artwork in Large-scale Vision Language Models (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | LVLMs are increasingly capable of responding in multiple languages . however, there is a lack of evaluation tools for LVLs that handle multiple languages. |
| Approach: | They used an extended dataset in multiple languages to evaluate LVLMs' ability to generate explanations in multiple language combinations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset in multiple languages evaluates LVLMs' ability to generate explanations in other languages. |
SURf: Teaching Large Vision-Language Models to Selectively Utilize Retrieved Information (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies focus on the text modality or are limited to specific tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to teach Large Vision-Language Models to selectively utilize retrieved information and improve their robustness against irrelevant or misleading references. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves LVLMs’ ability to utilize retrieved multimodal references and their robustness against irrelevant or misleading information. |
UQ-Merge: Uncertainty Guided Multimodal Large Language Model Merging (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models merging methods often lead to suboptimal performance due to harmful models . et al., 2018; 59: 59-64. |
| Approach: | They propose an uncertainty-guided MLLM merging algorithm that integrates models into a single MLML. |
| Outcome: | The proposed algorithm improves on held-in and held-out vision-language benchmarks. |
ViFT: Towards Visual Instruction-Free Fine-tuning for Large Vision-Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Visual instruction tuning is the predominant technology in eliciting multimodal task-solving capabilities of large vision-language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a visual instruction-free fine-tuning framework for large vision-language models . they require only text-only instructions and image caption data during training . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework is based on visual instruction tuning, but requires images as input . it can achieve state-of-the-art performance on several downstream benchmarks with less training data. |
UnifiedVisual: A Framework for Constructing Unified Vision-Language Datasets (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Pengyu Wang, Shaojun Zhou, Chenkun Tan, Xinghao Wang, Wei Huang, Zhen Ye, Zhaowei Li, Botian Jiang, Dong Zhang, Xipeng Qiu
| Challenge: | Existing datasets address understanding and generation in isolation, limiting the performance of unified vision large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset that facilitates mutual enhancement between multimodal understanding and generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework integrates diverse visual and textual inputs and outputs, enabling comprehensive cross-modal reasoning and precise text-to-image alignment. |
InternLM-XComposer2.5-Reward: A Simple Yet Effective Multi-Modal Reward Model (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yuhang Zang, Xiaoyi Dong, Pan Zhang, Yuhang Cao, Ziyu Liu, Shengyuan Ding, Shenxi Wu, Yubo Ma, Haodong Duan, Wenwei Zhang, Kai Chen, Dahua Lin, Jiaqi Wang
| Challenge: | Despite the promising performance of Large Vision Language Models, they sometimes generate incorrect outputs. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-modal reward model that aligns LVLMs with human preferences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves excellent results on the latest multi-modal reward model benchmark and shows competitive performance on text-only reward model. |
Vision-Free Retrieval: Rethinking Multimodal Search with Textual Scene Descriptions (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Contrastively trained Vision-Language Models exhibit shallow language understanding, manifesting bag-of-words behaviour. |
| Approach: | They propose a vision-free, single-encoder retrieval pipeline to replace traditional text-to-image retrieval paradigm with structured image descriptions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach reduces the modality gap and improves compositionality and performance on short and long caption queries. |