Challenge: Socioeconomic status (SES) fundamentally influences how people interact with technology, but it is limited by proxy metrics and synthetic data.
Approach: They collect 6,482 prompts from previous interactions of 1,000 individuals from ‘diverse socioeconomic backgrounds’ about their use of language technologies and generative AI.
Outcome: The findings show that higher SES groups have higher levels of abstraction, convey requests more concisely, and topics like ‘inclusivity’ and ‘travel’.

Similar Papers

Classist Tools: Social Class Correlates with Performance in NLP (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: despite growing concerns surrounding fairness and bias in NLP, there is a dearth of studies delving into the effects it may have on NLP systems.
Approach: They argue that NLP systems’ performance is affected by speakers’ SES, potentially disadvantaging less-privileged socioeconomic groups.
Outcome: The proposed model shows that NLP systems perform better on tasks with social class, ethnicity and geographical variation than those without social class.
Quantifying the Dialect Gap and its Correlates Across Languages (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Historically, studies investigating minority variants of languages have been limited to a select few languages.
Approach: They evaluate state-of-the-art large language models for regional dialects of several high- and low-resource languages and analyze how regional dialect gap is correlated with economic, social, and linguistic factors.
Outcome: The proposed model is compared with two high-use applications and shows that it can solve the regional dialect gap.
Bridging the Digital Divide: Performance Variation across Socio-Economic Factors in Vision-Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Among the minority groups under-represented in AI, data from low-income households are often overlooked in data collection and model evaluation.
Approach: They evaluate the performance of a vision-language model on a geo-diverse dataset . they highlight insights that can help mitigate these issues and propose actionable steps for economic-level inclusive AI development.
Outcome: The proposed model performs lower for the poorer groups than the wealthier groups across topics and countries.
The Linguistic Connectivities Within Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have discovered notable disparities in their performance across different languages.
Approach: They conduct a systematic investigation into the behaviors of large language models across 27 different languages on 3 different scenarios and reveals a Linguistic Map correlates with the richness of available resources and linguistic family relations.
Outcome: The proposed model demonstrates that there are significant disparities in performance across languages across 27 different languages on 3 different scenarios.
Human Alignment: How Much Do We Adapt to LLMs? (2025.acl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming a common part of our lives, yet few studies have examined how they influence our behavior.
Approach: They propose a cooperative language game in which players aim to converge on a word and play a game in a group.
Outcome: The proposed game shows that humans notice and adapt to differences regardless of whether they are aware they are interacting with an LLM.
Human-AI Interaction in the Age of LLMs (2024.naacl-tutorials)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the capabilities of AI systems.
Approach: This tutorial will provide an overview of the interaction between humans and Large Language Models (LLMs) it will start with a review of the types of AI models we interact with and walkthrough of the core concepts in Human-AI Interaction.
Outcome: This tutorial will provide an overview of the interaction between humans and LLMs, exploring the challenges, opportunities, and ethical considerations that arise in this dynamic landscape.
‘Rich Dad, Poor Lad’: How do Large Language Models Contextualize Socioeconomic Factors in College Admission ? (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models are increasingly involved in high-stakes domains, yet how they reason about socially sensitive decisions remains underexplored.
Approach: They propose a dual-process audit framework to probe LLMs’ reasoning behaviors in sensitive applications using a synthetic dataset of 30,000 applicant profiles grounded in real-world correlations.
Outcome: The proposed framework exploits a synthetic dataset of 30,000 applicant profiles grounded in real-world correlations to probe LLMs' reasoning behaviors in sensitive applications.
Impoverished Language Technology: The Lack of (Social) Class in NLP (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work on socio-demographic factors has focused on how much a person's socioeconomic status affects their language production and perception.
Approach: They propose to include socio-economic class in future natural language processing (NLP) research aimed at understanding relationships between socio-demographic factors and language production and perception.
Outcome: The proposed definition of class can be operationalised by NLP researchers and argue for including socio-economic class in future language technologies.
The Impact of Large Language Models in Academia: from Writing to Speaking (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) are impacting human society, especially in textual information.
Approach: They propose to build an automated monitoring platform to track the impact of large language models on human expression.
Outcome: The results show that LLM-style words such as significant are used more frequently in abstracts and oral presentations.
Language Technologies as If People Mattered: Centering Communities in Language Technology Development (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Developing and deploying language technologies "as if people mattered" requires a reflexive and receptive approach, argues a new position paper .
Approach: They argue that researchers should address linguistic and algorithmic injustice together with language communities to build strong interdisciplinary teams.
Outcome: The authors argue that researchers should address social and linguistic injustice together with language communities to solve the challenges raised by language technologies.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations