SURVEYFORGE : On the Outline Heuristics, Memory-Driven Generation, and Multi-dimensional Evaluation for Automated Survey Writing (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | SURVEYFORGE automates survey paper writing, but quality gap between LLM-generated and human-written surveys remains significant. |
| Approach: | They propose a survey tool that automatically generates and refines human-written surveys. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that SURVEYFORGE outperforms previous work such as AutoSurvey in outline quality and content quality. |
Similar Papers
SurveyGen: Quality-Aware Scientific Survey Generation with Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Automated survey generation is a key task in scientific document processing due to lack of standardized evaluation datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose a survey-based framework that integrates quality indicators into literature retrieval to assess higher-quality sources. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enhances the standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipeline and enables human-guided writing. |
Feedback Is The Key for Automated Survey Generation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) provide a promising foundation for literature surveys, but guiding them to generate accurate, reliable content remains a fundamental challenge. |
| Approach: | They propose a feedback-driven framework that incorporates feedback across three dimensions: outline feedback for structural clarity, citation feedback for evidence validation, and content feedback for readability and analytical depth. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework significantly improves both citation and content quality, demonstrating feedback as the critical mechanism for automatic survey generation. |
HoWToBench: Holistic Evaluation for LLM’s Capability in Human-level Writing using Tree of Writing (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Andrew Zhuoer Feng, Cunxiang Wang, Yu Luo, Lin Fan, Irene Zhou, Zikang Wang, Xiaotao Gu, Jie Tang, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang
| Challenge: | Evaluating the writing capabilities of large language models remains a significant challenge due to the multidimensional nature of writing skills and the limitations of existing metrics. |
| Approach: | They propose to model the aggregation weights of sub-features in a tree-structured workflow and propose a Chinese writing benchmark that mitigates biases. |
| Outcome: | The proposed tree-of-writing (ToW) measures the writing capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in Chinese and shows that it mitigates biases and achieves a *0.93* Pearson correlation with human judgments. |
Transparent Reference-free Automated Evaluation of Open-Ended User Survey Responses (2025.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to evaluate open-ended survey responses are expensive and lack ground-truth reference for comparison. |
| Approach: | They propose a two-stage evaluation framework specifically designed for human survey responses that uses gibberish filtering to remove nonsensical responses. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation framework outperforms existing metrics on English and Korean datasets and shows strong correlations with expert assessment. |
Evaluating Large Language Models on Wikipedia-Style Survey Generation (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Fan Gao, Hang Jiang, Rui Yang, Qingcheng Zeng, Jinghui Lu, Moritz Blum, Tianwei She, Yuang Jiang, Irene Li
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that large language models can perform well in general tasks, but their effectiveness and limitations in domainspecific tasks remain unclear. |
| Approach: | They examine the proficiency of Large Language Models (LLMs) in generating succinct survey articles specific to the niche field of NLP in computer science. |
| Outcome: | The LLMs perform better in generating succinct survey articles specific to the niche field of NLP in computer science, compared to human-authored surveys, but they exhibit bias in evaluation. |
Bloom-Eval: A Hierarchical Evaluation Benchmark for Automatic Survey Generation Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods suffer from cognitive dimensional simplification and methodological unreliability due to the ”LLM-as-a-Judge” approach. |
| Approach: | They propose a six-tiered benchmark that evaluates ASG systems by prioritizing deterministic algorithms and introducing a GRADE approach for abstract abilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method provides the ASG field with a systematic, reproducible, and theoretically grounded benchmark to guide future research. |
Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Survey (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Zhen Tan, Dawei Li, Song Wang, Alimohammad Beigi, Bohan Jiang, Amrita Bhattacharjee, Mansooreh Karami, Jundong Li, Lu Cheng, Huan Liu
| Challenge: | Existing surveys focus on LLMs' specific utility for data annotation and synthesis. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models to generate annotations from raw data . they also propose to review learning strategies for models utilizing LLM-generated annotations . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can be used to improve the efficacy of machine learning models by generating and labeling raw data with relevant information. |
DeepSynth-Eval: Objectively Evaluating Information Consolidation in Deep Survey Writing (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Hongzhi Zhang, Yuanze Hu, Tinghai Zhang, Jia Fu, Tao Wang, Junwei Jing, Zhaoxin Fan, Wei Bi, Ruiming Tang, Han Li, Guorui Zhou, Kun Gai
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are evolving towards autonomous agents . retrieval capabilities are well-benchmarked, but post-retrieval synthesis is under-evaluated due to open-ended writing. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate information consolidation capabilities using survey papers as gold standards. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark analyzes the post-retrieval synthesis stage of large language models . it leverages high-quality survey papers as gold standards and reverse-engineers research requests . the proposed benchmark outperforms single-turn generation and reduces hallucinations . |
FeedEval: Pedagogically Aligned Evaluation of LLM-Generated Essay Feedback (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent research emphasizes the generation of high-quality feedback that provides justification and actionable guidance. |
| Approach: | They propose an LLM-based framework for evaluating LLM feedback along three dimensions: specificity, helpfulness, and validity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates LLM-generated feedback along three dimensions: specificity, helpfulness, and validity. |
Survey Response Generation: Generating Closed-Ended Survey Responses In-Silico with Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies focus on generating closed-ended survey responses with large language models, whereas LLMs are typically trained to generate open-ended text. |
| Approach: | They evaluate the impact of various Survey Response Generation Methods on simulated responses by generating closed-ended responses from large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods perform best in individual-level and subpopulation-level alignment. |