Beyond Facts: Evaluating Intent Hallucination in Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) produce unsatisfactory results when faced with complex queries containing multiple conditions. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for intent hallucination that covers 20,068 problems and an automatic LLM generation evaluation metric for detecting intent hallucinosis. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers query-only and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) setups with varying topics and difficulty. |
Similar Papers
What Makes a Good Query? Measuring the Impact of Human-Confusing Linguistic Features on LLM Performance (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are often treated as defects of the model or its decoding strategy. |
| Approach: | They construct a 22-dimension query feature vector covering clause complexity, lexical rarity, anaphora, negation, answerability, and intention grounding. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model covers clause complexity, lexical rarity, anaphora, negation, answerability, and intention grounding, all known to affect human comprehension. |
The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a growing number of researchers are studying the hallucination issue in large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a hallucination detection benchmark and a method to detect hallucines in LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method detects hallucinations and mitigates them using different training stages. |
HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing large language models (LLMs) are prone to generate hallucinations . a recent study shows that LLMs are able to generate content that conflicts with the source or cannot be verified by factual knowledge. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) they propose to use a sample of generated and human-annotated hallucinated samples to evaluate their performance . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework generates and annotates hallucinated samples from ChatGPT . the results show that existing LLMs face great challenges in recognizing hallucines . |
The Curious Case of Hallucinatory (Un)answerability: Finding Truths in the Hidden States of Over-Confident Large Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to possess impressive capabilities, but they are not problem-free. |
| Approach: | They explore the behavior of large language models when presented with (un)answerable queries. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models encode the answerability of an input query, the authors show . they also show that the first decoded token is a strong indicator . |
The Illusion of Progress: Re-evaluating Hallucination Detection in LLMs (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Denis Janiak, Jakub Binkowski, Albert Sawczyn, Bogdan Gabrys, Ravid Shwartz-Ziv, Tomasz Jan Kajdanowicz
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, but their tendency to hallucinate poses serious challenges for reliable deployment. |
| Approach: | They propose to use ROUGE to assess lexical overlap to determine accuracy of hallucination detection methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation frameworks can rival complex methods, exposing a fundamental flaw in current evaluation practices. |
The Troubling Emergence of Hallucination in Large Language Models - An Extensive Definition, Quantification, and Prescriptive Remediations (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Vipula Rawte, Swagata Chakraborty, Agnibh Pathak, Anubhav Sarkar, S.M Towhidul Islam Tonmoy, Aman Chadha, Amit Sheth, Amitava Das
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models have generated widespread acclaim, but hallucination has also emerged as a by-product. |
| Approach: | They propose a fine-grained discourse on profiling hallucination based on its degree, orientation, and category . they categorize hallucines into six types: acronym ambiguity, generated golem, virtual voice, geographic erratum, time wrap . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method categorizes hallucination into six types based on their degree, orientation, and category . |
On Large Language Models’ Hallucination with Regard to Known Facts (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Che Jiang, Biqing Qi, Xiangyu Hong, Dayuan Fu, Yang Cheng, Fandong Meng, Mo Yu, Bowen Zhou, Jie Zhou
| Challenge: | Large language models are successful in answering factoid questions but are also prone to hallucination. |
| Approach: | They propose self-reporting to the model when faced with such limitations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed classifier can detect hallucinations with an 88% success rate and can be used to answer factoid questions with correct answer knowledge. |
PRISM: Probing Reasoning, Instruction, and Source Memory in LLM Hallucinations (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yuhe Wu, Guangyu Wang, Yuran Chen, Jiatong Zhang, Yutong Zhang, Yujie Chen, Jiaming Shang, Guang Zhang, Zhuang Liu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for hallucination evaluation rely on mixed queries and posterior evaluation, which quantifies hallucinosity severity but offers limited insight into where and why they occur. |
| Approach: | They propose a controlled benchmark that disentangles hallucinations into four dimensions: knowledge missing, knowledge errors, reasoning errors, and instruction-following errors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model disentangles hallucinations into four dimensions: knowledge missing, knowledge errors, reasoning errors, and instruction-following errors. |
Can We Trust AI Doctors? A Survey of Medical Hallucination in Large Language and Large Vision-Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Zhihong Zhu, Yunyan Zhang, Xianwei Zhuang, Fan Zhang, Zhongwei Wan, Yuyan Chen, QingqingLong QingqingLong, Yefeng Zheng, Xian Wu
| Challenge: | Hallucination is a critical challenge for large language models and large vision-language models (LVLMs) however, dedicated research on medical hallucinations remains unexplored. |
| Approach: | They provide a unified perspective on medical hallucination for both LLMs and LVLMs, and delve into its causes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models have demonstrated impressive performance on a variety of medical benchmarks. |
DiaHalu: A Dialogue-level Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for hallucination detection are intentionally generated by large language models (LLMs) however, many focus on factuality while ignoring faithfulness. |
| Approach: | They propose a dialogue-level hallucination evaluation benchmark for large language models . they integrate the topic into prompts and facilitate a dialog between two LLMs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers four common multi-turn dialogue domains and five hallucination subtypes, extended from factuality and faithfulness hallucines. |