Know-MRI: A Knowledge Mechanisms Revealer&Interpreter for Large Language Models (2025.acl-demo)
Copied to clipboard
Jiaxiang Liu, Boxuan Xing, Chenhao Yuan, ChenxiangZhang ChenxiangZhang, Di Wu, Xiusheng Huang, Haida Yu, Chuhan Lang, Pengfei Cao, Jun Zhao, Kang Liu
| Challenge: | Existing interpretation methods only support tasks with specific inputs, limiting their practical applications. |
| Approach: | They propose an extensible module that matches different input data with interpretation methods and consolidates the interpreting outputs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed module can match different input data with interpretation methods and consolidate the interpreting outputs. |
Similar Papers
Knowledge Mechanisms in Large Language Models: A Survey and Perspective (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Mengru Wang, Yunzhi Yao, Ziwen Xu, Shuofei Qiao, Shumin Deng, Peng Wang, Xiang Chen, Jia-Chen Gu, Yong Jiang, Pengjun Xie, Fei Huang, Huajun Chen, Ningyu Zhang
| Challenge: | Using large language models, we can understand knowledge mechanisms in LLMs for learning, storage, utilization, and evolution. |
| Approach: | They propose to analyze knowledge mechanisms in Large Language Models (LLMs) they examine utilization, evolution, and the potential dark knowledge (hypothesis) they hope to help understand knowledge in LLMs and provide insights for future research . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used to analyze the evolution of parametric knowledge in LLMs. |
Injecting Domain-Specific Knowledge into Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | specialized LLMs are often limited in domain-specific applications that require specialized knowledge. |
| Approach: | They provide a comprehensive overview of four key methods to enhance large language models by integrating domain-specific knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods are categorized into four key approaches: dynamic knowledge injection, static knowledge embedding, modular adapters, and prompt optimization. |
How Do Large Language Models Capture the Ever-changing World Knowledge? A Review of Recent Advances (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are impressive in solving tasks, but they can quickly be outdated after deployment. |
| Approach: | They provide a review of recent advances in aligning deployed large language models with the ever-changing world knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can be used to perform various tasks directly through in-context learning or for further fine-tuning for domain-specific uses. |
A Survey on Sparse Autoencoders: Interpreting the Internal Mechanisms of Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) can disentangle complex features into more interpretable components. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Sparse Autoencoders to disentangle LLM features into more interpretable components. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method disentangles complex features into more interpretable components. |
LinguaLens: Towards Interpreting Linguistic Mechanisms of Large Language Models via Sparse Auto-Encoder (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior research on linguistic mechanisms of large language models is limited by coarse granularity, limited analysis scale, and narrow focus. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for analyzing the linguistic mechanisms of large language models based on Sparse Auto-Encoders. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework extracts Chinese and English linguistic features across four dimensions . it uncovers intrinsic representations of linguistic knowledge in LLMs and can control outputs . |
A Survey on LLM-powered Agents for Recommender Systems (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding, reasoning, and generation. |
| Approach: | They present a comprehensive synthesis of large language models and their applications . they dissect a four-module agent architecture and review representative designs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models address fundamental challenges in traditional recommender systems . they include limited comprehension of complex user intents, insufficient interaction capabilities . |
Exploring the Cognitive Knowledge Structure of Large Language Models: An Educational Diagnostic Assessment Approach (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on LLMs evaluation with exams are lacking in cognitive research on their overall knowledge structure. |
| Approach: | They conduct an evaluation using a human test dataset based on Bloom Taxonomy to reveal the knowledge structures of Large Language Models and gain insights of their cognitive capabilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can pass AP, SAT, and Leetcode exams, but lacks the cognitive power to perform on human exams. |
Towards Intrinsic Interpretability of Large Language Models: A Survey of Design Principles and Architectures (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on explainable AI focus on post-hoc explanation methods that interpret trained models through external approximations. |
| Approach: | They propose to categorize existing approaches into five design paradigms: functional transparency, concept alignment, representational decomposability, explicit modularization, and latent sparsity induction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approaches are categorized into five design paradigms: functional transparency, concept alignment, representational decomposability, explicit modularization, and latent sparsity induction. |
Explaining Language Model Predictions with High-Impact Concepts (2024.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to explain large language models (LLMs) are mostly correlational and lack causal features due to compositional nature of languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to provide impact-aware explanations for large language models that are robust to feature changes and influential to the model’s predictions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed explanations improve on real and synthetic tasks and are robust to feature changes and influential to the model’s predictions. |
Do Large Language Models Know How Much They Know? (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models are highly capable systems, but their capabilities and limitations are unclear. |
| Approach: | They develop a benchmark that challenges LLMs to recall all information they possess on specific topics. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can recall excessive, insufficient, or the precise amount of information they possess on a given topic, indicating their awareness of how much they know about the given topic. |