Papers by Yutong Gao
NL2Logic: AST-Guided Translation of Natural Language into First-Order Logic with Large Language Models (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Structured reasoning approaches that parse first-order logic rules from natural language lack syntax control and semantic faithfulness. |
| Approach: | They propose a structured reasoning paradigm that parses first-order logic rules from natural language and delegates inference to automated solvers. |
| Outcome: | a proposed framework parses first-order logic rules from natural language and delegates inference to automated solvers. |
ContextBLIP: Doubly Contextual Alignment for Contrastive Image Retrieval from Linguistically Complex Descriptions (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Honglin Lin, Siyu Li, Guoshun Nan, Chaoyue Tang, Xueting Wang, Jingxin Xu, Rong Yankai, Zhouzhili Zhouzhili, Yutong Gao, Qimei Cui, Xiaofeng Tao
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to image retrieval from contextual descriptions (IRCD) lag behind human performance in IRCD. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that relies on a doubly contextual alignment scheme for challenging IRCD. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can yield comparable results with GPT-4V, despite fewer parameters. |
Spotlighter: Revisiting Prompt Tuning from a Representative Mining View (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Spotlighter is a lightweight token-selection framework that enhances accuracy and efficiency in prompt tuning. |
| Approach: | They propose a token-selection framework that enhances accuracy and efficiency in prompt tuning by preserving only the top-scoring tokens for downstream prediction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms CLIP by up to 11.19% in harmonic mean accuracy and achieves 0.8K additional FPS, with only 21 extra parameters. |
TLUE: A Tibetan Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Fan Gao, Cheng Huang, Yutong Liu, Nyima Tashi, Xiangxiang Wang, Thupten Tsering, Ban Ma-bao, Renzeng Duojie, Gadeng Luosang, Rinchen Dongrub, Dorje Tashi, Xiao Feng Cd, Yongbin Yu, Hao Wang
| Challenge: | Low-resource languages, like Tibetan, remain underrepresented in large language models' evaluations. |
| Approach: | They propose a Tibetan Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark to assess LLMs' proficiency in Tibetan . they use a multi-task understanding benchmark and a safety benchmark to evaluate models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark shows that most large language models perform below the random baseline, especially in Tibetan language processing. |
Chain-of-Procedure: Hierarchical Visual-Language Reasoning for Procedural QA (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Guanhua Chen, Yutong Yao, Shenghe Sun, Ci-jun Gao, Shudong Liu, Lidia S. Chao, Feng Wan, Derek F. Wong
| Challenge: | Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved impressive results on standard image-text tasks, yet their capability in visual procedure question answering (VP-QA) remains largely unexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a multimodal benchmark specifically designed for visual procedural reasoning that synergizes cross-modal procedure retrieval, context-aware step decomposition, and the next step prediction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework significantly outperforms baselines on visual procedure question answering (VP-QA) Experiments on six VLMs show that it performs better than baselines. |
Towards Intrinsic Interpretability of Large Language Models: A Survey of Design Principles and Architectures (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on explainable AI focus on post-hoc explanation methods that interpret trained models through external approximations. |
| Approach: | They propose to categorize existing approaches into five design paradigms: functional transparency, concept alignment, representational decomposability, explicit modularization, and latent sparsity induction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approaches are categorized into five design paradigms: functional transparency, concept alignment, representational decomposability, explicit modularization, and latent sparsity induction. |