GECSum: Generative Evaluation-Driven Sequence Level Contrastive Learning for Abstractive Summarization (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization is a technique in natural language processing that involves generating a summary of a source document by creating new sentences and phrases. |
| Approach: | They propose a sequence-level contrastive learning framework that leverages the semantic understanding capabilities of the abstractive model itself to evaluate summary in reference-based settings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms the state-of-the-art in four summarization datasets. |
Similar Papers
SimCLS: A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Abstractive Summarization (2021.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results show that SimCLS can improve existing top-performing models by a large margin. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for abstractive summarization that is conceptually simple and empirically powerful. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves the performance of top-performing models by a large margin against existing top-scoring systems. |
Alleviating Exposure Bias via Multi-level Contrastive Learning and Deviation Simulation in Abstractive Summarization (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization systems have a severe mismatch between training and inference, i.e., exposure bias. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-level contrastive learning framework for abstractive summarization and a tailored sparse decoder self-attention pattern to bridge the gap between training and inference. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms the state-of-the-art models on two summarization datasets while adding relatively low overhead. |
SumCSE: Summary as a transformation for Contrastive Learning (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Sentence embedding models are typically trained using contrastive learning (CL) using human annotations directly or by repurposing other annotated datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose to use generative language models to generate CL data using annotated data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms the previous best unsupervised method by 1.8 points and SimCSE, a strong supervised baseline by 0.3 points on the semantic text similarity (STS) benchmark. |
CoLo: A Contrastive Learning Based Re-ranking Framework for One-Stage Summarization (2022.coling-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for extractive and abstractive summarization use token-level or sentence-level training objectives. |
| Approach: | They propose a Contrastive Learning based re-ranking framework for one-stage summarization called CoLo. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework boosts extractive and abstractive results on CNN/DailyMail benchmarks while maintaining inference efficiency. |
Fine-grained Contrastive Learning for Definition Generation (2022.aacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent pre-trained transformer-based definition generation models lack effective representation learning to contain full semantic components of the given word, leading to under-specific definitions. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel contrastive learning method that encourages the model to capture more detailed semantic representations from the definition sequence encoding. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method could generate more specific definitions compared with state-of-the-art models. |
CDEvalSumm: An Empirical Study of Cross-Dataset Evaluation for Neural Summarization Systems (2020.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods for text summarization systems are limited to in-domain setting, where supervised pre-trained models are evaluated on the same dataset. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a cross-dataset evaluation approach to evaluate different summarization systems in a multi-domain setting. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used to evaluate text summarization systems on different datasets. |
Alleviating Exposure Bias in Abstractive Summarization via Sequentially Generating and Revising (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to abstractive summarization suffer from exposure bias . Existing solutions bridge this gap through un- or semi-supervised holistic learning . |
| Approach: | They propose to reformat abstractive summarization to sequential generation and revision (SeGRe) this allows the model to assess the flawed summary from a global perspective and modify inappropriate expressions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can assess the flawed summary from a global view and modify inappropriate expressions. |
Understanding the Behaviour of Neural Abstractive Summarizers using Contrastive Examples (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Neural abstractive summarization systems generate summary texts conditioned on the input source text, and have recently achieved high ROUGE scores on benchmark summarizing datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose to analyze existing neural abstractive summarization systems by comparing their performance to human-written summaries. |
| Outcome: | The proposed systems perform better than human-written summarizations on different datasets and show that they are able to understand deeper syntactic and semantic structures. |
Abstractive Summarizers are Excellent Extractive Summarizers (2023.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization systems have traditionally been fragmented, limiting the benefits of compatible models. |
| Approach: | They propose three new inference algorithms using sequence-to-sequence architectures to model extractive summarization with an abstractive summmarization system. |
| Outcome: | The proposed algorithms outperform existing models on CNN and Dailymail and show that they are more efficient than existing models. |
Sequence-level Large Language Model Training with Contrastive Preference Optimization (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new method to improve the performance of large language models requires a small computational cost. |
| Approach: | They propose a CPO procedure that can inject sequence-level information into the model at any training stage without expensive human labeled data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed objective surpasses the next token prediction in terms of win rate in instruction-following and text generation tasks. |