Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Experts (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is the primary method for aligning large language models with human preferences. |
| Approach: | They propose to train an Absolute-Rating Multi-Objective Reward Model with multi-dimensional absolute-rating data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the LLM-as-a-judge method on RewardBench . it achieves state-of-the-art performance on the benchmark . |
Similar Papers
Arithmetic Control of LLMs for Diverse User Preferences: Directional Preference Alignment with Multi-Objective Rewards (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) relies on scalar rewards to capture user preferences. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that integrates multi-objective reward modeling to represent diverse preference profiles. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves performance across reward objectives and targets. |
Beyond One-Preference-Fits-All Alignment: Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimization (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent approaches to language model alignment assume homogeneous human preferences, but actual human preferences vary widely and are hard to satisfy with a single language model. |
| Approach: | They propose an RL-free extension of Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) that folds language modeling directly into reward modeling and trains language models as collective reward models that combine all objectives with specific weights. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method matches or outperforms existing methods in safety alignment and long-form question answering. |
PaTaRM: Bridging Pairwise and Pointwise Signals via Preference-Aware Task-Adaptive Reward Modeling (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing reward models lack generative and reasoning capabilities, resulting in poor performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a reward-aware task-adaptive reward model that enables pointwise training using readily available pairwise data via a novel Preference-Aware Reward mechanism. |
| Outcome: | The proposed reward model achieves an average relative improvement of 8.7% over the base models on RewardBench and RMBench. |
RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Nathan Lambert, Valentina Pyatkin, Jacob Morrison, Lester James Validad Miranda, Bill Yuchen Lin, Khyathi Chandu, Nouha Dziri, Sachin Kumar, Tom Zick, Yejin Choi, Noah A. Smith, Hannaneh Hajishirzi
| Challenge: | Evaluating reward models presents an opportunity to understand the opaque technologies used for alignment of language models. |
| Approach: | They present a benchmark dataset and code-base for evaluation of reward models . they use prompt-chosen-rejected trios to benchmark how they perform on queries . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset compares RMs with other models on a set of questions. |
DMoERM: Recipes of Mixture-of-Experts for Effective Reward Modeling (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using a reward model (RM) to improve the effectiveness of large language models, there are two challenges in training. |
| Approach: | They propose a reward model (RM) that is a proxy of human preferences and assigns scores to the outputs of the large language model (LLM) a human annotation consistency rate of 60% to 75% is causing training data to contain a lot of noise. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art ensemble methods and mitigates the overoptimization problem. |
SteerLM: Attribute Conditioned SFT as an (User-Steerable) Alternative to RLHF (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) are not effective in generating useful and high-quality responses. |
| Approach: | They propose a supervised fine-tuning method that empowers end-users to control responses during inference. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) can generate helpful and high-quality responses while maintaining customizability. |
Activation Reward Models for Few-Shot Model Alignment (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Tianning Chai, Chancharik Mitra, Brandon Huang, Gautam Rajendrakumar Gare, Zhiqiu Lin, Assaf Arbelle, Leonid Karlinsky, Rogerio Feris, Trevor Darrell, Deva Ramanan, Roei Herzig
| Challenge: | A common approach is to use reward models that enable reinforcement-learning post-training. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that steers LLM activations to align with few-shot preference data without finetuning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method surpasses zero-shot, few-shot and voting-based benchmarks on reward hacking and noise signals. |
APLOT: Robust Reward Modeling via Adaptive Preference Learning with Optimal Transport (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results show that RLHF improves performance of Large Language Models . BT-based RMs struggle to distinguish between similar preference responses . |
| Approach: | They propose to enhance BT-based reward models by using an adaptive margin mechanism . they use semantic similarity and reward-predicted reward differences to adjust focus . |
| Outcome: | Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms existing methods in both in-distribution and OOD settings. |
Aligning Large Language Models via Fully Self-Synthetic Data (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) require expensive human-annotated datasets and proprietary models like GPT-4 to annotate preference pairs. |
| Approach: | They propose a self-synthetic framework for LLM alignment where all training data, including prompts (i.e., user queries), responses, and preferences, are generated by the model itself. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enhances the model’s chat capabilities on standard benchmarks like AlpacaEval 2.0 while maintaining strong performance on downstream objective tasks. |
Aligning Large Language Models with Human Preferences through Representation Engineering (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Wenhao Liu, Xiaohua Wang, Muling Wu, Tianlong Li, Changze Lv, Zixuan Ling, Zhu JianHao, Cenyuan Zhang, Xiaoqing Zheng, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Existing methods for achieving this alignment involve employing reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) Existing approaches involve using RLHF to fine-tune LLMs based on human labels . however, RLRF is susceptible to instability during fine- tuning and presents challenges in implementation. |
| Approach: | They propose to use reinforcement learning from human feedback to fine-tune large language models with human preferences to achieve precise control of model behavior. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that RAHF can be used to capture and manipulate representations to align with a broad spectrum of human preferences or values rather than being confined to a single concept or function. |