CR-LLM: A Dataset and Optimization for Concept Reasoning of Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Nianqi Li, Jingping Liu, Sihang Jiang, Haiyun Jiang, Yanghua Xiao, Jiaqing Liang, Zujie Liang, Feng Wei, Jinglei Chen, Zhenghong Hao, Bing Han
| Challenge: | Existing concept reasoning related datasets suffer from modeledge leakage and context leakage. |
| Approach: | They propose a concept reasoning for large language models with modeledge leakage prevention and context leakage preventive methods to improve the models' conceptual reasoning abilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method significantly improves the existing models and reasoning methods, achieving a 7% increase in accuracy compared to CoT and showing better granularity. |
Similar Papers
One Missing Piece for Open-Source Reasoning Models: A Dataset to Mitigate Cold-Starting Short CoT LLMs in RL (2025.acl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
Hyungjoo Chae, Dongjin Kang, Jihyuk Kim, Beong-woo Kwak, Sunghyun Park, Haeju Park, Jinyoung Yeo, Moontae Lee, Kyungjae Lee
| Challenge: | Existing large reasoning models are limited by their closed nature and high API costs and safety issues. |
| Approach: | They propose to build a long CoT dataset with existing short CoT LLMs that are not trained for inference-time scaling. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves quality comparable to—or slightly below—R1 and is able to think longer and provide control over the thought budget to better manage the overthinking problem. |
Current Advances in LLM Reasoning (2026.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial examines comprehensive evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) advanced inference time methods and post-training methods that aim to make LLMs think more like humans are discussed in this tutorial. |
| Approach: | This tutorial explores comprehensive evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) and discusses two types of methods to improve models’ reasoning: advanced inference time methods, structured and self-improvement inference methods, and post-training methods, such as RLHF, DPO, and GRPO. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial examines evaluation strategies to assess the reasoning abilities of large language models and discusses two types of methods to improve models’ reasoning. |
FeRG-LLM : Feature Engineering by Reason Generation Large Language Models (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | FeRG-LLM is a large language model that performs feature engineering at an 8billion-parameter scale. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to perform feature engineering at an 8billion-parameter scale using conversational dialogues. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms Llama 3.1 70B and Llma 3.2 on most datasets while using fewer resources and achieving reduced inference time. |
Enhancing Large Language Models through Transforming Reasoning Problems into Classification Tasks (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
Tarun Raheja, Raunak Sinha, Advit Deepak, Will Healy, Jayanth Srinivasa, Myungjin Lee, Ramana Kompella
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to improve LLMs' reasoning capabilities for constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) are needed to solve complex tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that leverages the LLM's ability to decide when to call a function from a set of logical-linguistic primitives, each of which can interact with a local “scratchpad” memory and logical inference engine. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the reasoning capabilities of large language models for constraint satisfaction problems by 40% over baselines. |
Efficient Inference for Large Language Models –Algorithm, Model, and System (2025.emnlp-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Inference of LLMs incurs high computational costs, memory access overhead, and memory usage, leading to inefficiencies in terms of latency, throughput, power consumption, and storage. |
| Approach: | This tutorial introduces the basics of efficient inference for LLMs and explains how to diagnose efficiency bottlenecks for a given workload on specific hardware. |
| Outcome: | The tutorial introduces the basic concepts of modern LLMs, software and hardware. |
LogicBench: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Mihir Parmar, Nisarg Patel, Neeraj Varshney, Mutsumi Nakamura, Man Luo, Santosh Mashetty, Arindam Mitra, Chitta Baral
| Challenge: | Existing work investigating the logical reasoning ability of large language models has focused only on a couple of inference rules of propositional and first-order logics. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a natural language question-answering dataset to evaluate the logical reasoning ability of large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs poorly on a range of natural language questions using chain-of-thought prompting. |
More Data or Better Data? A Critical Analysis of Data Selection and Synthesis for Mathematical Reasoning (2025.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Despite various proposed data construction methods, their practical utility in real-world pipelines remains underexplored. |
| Approach: | They conduct a comprehensive analysis of open-source datasets and data synthesis techniques for mathematical reasoning under a unified pipeline designed to mirror training and deployment scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipelines mirror training and deployment scenarios and are suitable for industrial applications. |
Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Reasoning is a fundamental aspect of human intelligence that plays a crucial role in many intellectual activities. |
| Approach: | They propose to improve LLMs' ability to elicit reasoning by providing exemplars or prompts to model reasoning. |
| Outcome: | This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the state of knowledge on reasoning in large language models. |
Exploring Self-supervised Logic-enhanced Training for Large Language Models (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Traditional attempts to enhance the logical reasoning abilities of language models often rely on supervised fine-tuning, limiting their generalization to new tasks or domains. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for integrating logical reasoning capabilities into LLMs and activating them via in-context learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves comparable results to existing models on three language understanding benchmarks. |
Large Language Models for Generative Recommendation: A Survey and Visionary Discussions (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the field of natural language processing but are not fully able to leverage the generative power of LLM. |
| Approach: | They examine the progress, methods, and future directions of large language models . they examine what generative recommendation is, why RS should advance to generative recommendations . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach can be simplified to generate recommendations from the entire pool of items. |