Discerning and Resolving Knowledge Conflicts through Adaptive Decoding with Contextual Information-Entropy Constraint (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing decoding methods for large language models (LLMs) are specialized in resolving knowledge conflicts and could inadvertently deteriorate performance in absence of conflicts. |
| Approach: | They propose an adaptive decoding method to discern whether knowledge conflicts occur and resolve them by a contextual information-entropy constraint decoding technique. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the model’s faithfulness to conflicting context and maintains high performance among non-conflicting contexts. |
Similar Papers
AdaCAD: Adaptively Decoding to Balance Conflicts between Contextual and Parametric Knowledge (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing contrastive methods that ignore the context of a large language model (LLM) fail to handle instances that vary in their amount of conflict, with static methods over-adjusting when conflict is absent. |
| Approach: | They propose a fine-grained, instance-level approach called AdaCAD which dynamically adjusts the degree of conflict based on the degree. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms baselines and improves factuality of summaries by 6.19. |
CoCoA: Confidence- and Context-Aware Adaptive Decoding for Resolving Knowledge Conflicts in Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing contrastive decoding methods that handle conflict lack adaptability and can degrade performance in low conflict settings. |
| Approach: | They propose a token-level algorithm for principled conflict resolution and enhanced faithfulness that resolves conflict by utilizing confidence-aware measures and the generalized divergence between parametric and contextual distributions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed algorithm achieves 9.2 points on average in QA, summarization, and long-form question answering (LFQA) benchmarks and improves factuality by 2.5 points on the key benchmarks. |
Knowledge Conflicts for LLMs: A Survey (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This survey examines knowledge conflicts for large language models (LLMs) this survey aims to shed light on strategies for improving the robustness of LLMs . |
| Approach: | They focus on three categories of knowledge conflicts: context-memory, inter-context, and intra-membry conflict. |
| Outcome: | The findings highlight the challenges faced by large language models when blending contextual and parametric knowledge. |
Untangle the KNOT: Interweaving Conflicting Knowledge and Reasoning Skills in Large Language Models (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have explained to what extent LLMs extract conflicting knowledge from the provided text, but they neglect the necessity to reason with conflicting information. |
| Approach: | They construct a dataset for knowledge conflict resolution examination in the form of question answering that divides reasoning with conflicting knowledge into three levels. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset enables analysis of reasoning with conflicting knowledge in the form of question answering. |
Task Matters: Knowledge Requirements Shape LLM Responses to Context–Memory Conflict (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior work has shown that large language models favor parametric knowledge under conflict, but this setting assumes that tasks should always rely on the provided passage. |
| Approach: | They propose a model-agnostic diagnostic framework that holds underlying knowledge constant while injecting controlled conflicts across tasks with varying knowledge requirements. |
| Outcome: | Evaluating representative open-source LLMs, the proposed framework holds underlying knowledge constant while injecting controlled conflicts across tasks with varying knowledge requirements. |
DYNAMICQA: Tracing Internal Knowledge Conflicts in Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | LMs are useful in a variety of downstream applications from summarization to fact-checking, often relying on factual knowledge memorized during pre-training. |
| Approach: | They use two knowledge conflict measures and a novel dataset DYNAMICQA to examine the effect of intra-memory conflict on LMs' ability to accept contextual knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can accept contextual knowledge with a higher degree of accuracy than models with fewer truth values. |
Entity-Based Knowledge Conflicts in Question Answering (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Knowledge-dependent tasks typically use two sources of knowledge: parametric, learned at training time, and contextual, given as a passage at inference time. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to mitigate over-reliance on parametric knowledge, which minimizes hallucination, and improves out-of-distribution generalization by 4% - 7%. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method minimizes hallucination and improves generalization to evolving information by 4% - 7%. |
Tracking the Limits of Knowledge Propagation: How LLMs Fail at Multi-Step Reasoning with Conflicting Knowledge (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for analyzing the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) focus on single knowledge updates and fact recall, but do not consider how these updates affect downstream reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to study how LLMs propagate new knowledge when it conflicts with the model's parametric knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark compared models with no updated facts to show that the new methods worsen performance and improve reasoning performance. |
Tug-of-War between Knowledge: Exploring and Resolving Knowledge Conflicts in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge conflicts in RALMs can ensnare them in a tug-of-war between knowledge and evidence, limiting their practical applicability. |
| Approach: | They propose a method called Conflict-Disentangle Contrastive Decoding (CD2) to better calibrate the model’s confidence. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can resolve knowledge conflicts in large language models with the help of conflict-disentangle contrast decoding (CD2) . |
LOKA: Conflict-Aware LLM Knowledge Update with Adaptive Knowledge Memory (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches that tackle unlearning and learning separately encounter *task conflicts* and *knowledge management issues* when applied to comprehensive knowledge updates. |
| Approach: | They propose a conflict-aware framework for Large language mOdel Knowledge updAtes that integrates updated knowledge across multiple memory units during training and integrates it with original LLM. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework is based on theoretical analysis and empirical evidence and validates the proposed framework with empirical and theoretical evidence. |