The Impact of Reasoning Step Length on Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Long reasoning steps in LLMs improve reasoning abilities, but the correlation between their effectiveness and the length of reasoning steps remains largely unknown. |
| Approach: | They conducted experiments that expand and compress the rationale reasoning steps within CoT demonstrations while keeping all other factors constant. |
| Outcome: | The results show that lengthening the reasoning steps in prompts significantly enhances LLMs’ reasoning abilities across multiple datasets. |
Similar Papers
Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matters (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting can dramatically improve the multi-step reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose to use Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting to encourage the LLM to generate intermediate rationales for solving a problem by providing a series of reasoning steps in the demonstrations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate coherent lines of reasoning even with invalid demonstrations while still generating coherent lines during inference. |
Deciphering the Factors Influencing the Efficacy of Chain-of-Thought: Probability, Memorization, and Noisy Reasoning (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has been shown to enhance the multi-step reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose to use CoT prompting to analyze a symbolic reasoning task where letters are shifted forward some number of steps in the alphabet. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well on a symbolic reasoning task, with three LLMs performing the task using CoT prompts. |
How Likely Do LLMs with CoT Mimic Human Reasoning? (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using chain-of-thought to elicit reasoning capabilities is not always effective and accurate. |
| Approach: | They compare the reasoning process of LLMs with humans to understand the causal chain . they find that LLM deviates from the ideal causal chain, resulting in spurious correlations . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method does not improve performance or accurately represent reasoning processes in LLMs. |
Markov Chain of Thought for Efficient Mathematical Reasoning (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have sought to enhance the mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a Markov Chain of Thought (MCoT) that compresses previous reasoning steps into a simplified question. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves efficiency and maintains comparable accuracy. |
On the Step Length Confounding in LLM Reasoning Data Selection (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Bing Wang, Rui Miao, Chen Shen, Shaotian Yan, Kaiyuan Liu, Ximing Li, Xiaosong Yuan, Sinan Fan, Jun Zhang, Jieping Ye
| Challenge: | Existing pipelines generate long reasoning data from more capable Large Language Models (LLMs) and apply manually heuristic or naturalness-based selection methods to filter high-quality samples. |
| Approach: | They propose to use supervised fine-tuning to generate long reasoning data from more capable Large Language Models and apply manually heuristic or naturalness-based selection methods to filter high-quality samples. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on four LLMs and five evaluation benchmarks show that the proposed approach is effective in mitigating step length confounding problem. |
Aligning Large and Small Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Reasoning (2024.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting empowers Large Language Models to solve complex reasoning tasks in a step-wise manner. |
| Approach: | They propose a method for aligning and transferring reasoning abilities between larger and smaller Language Models by using CoT-Demonstrations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms baselines on question-answering and mathematical reasoning benchmarks. |
ChainLM: Empowering Large Language Models with Improved Chain-of-Thought Prompting (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing CoT synthesis approaches focus on simpler reasoning tasks and result in inconsistent CoT prompts. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for automatic generation of superior CoT prompts based on three major evolution strategies . they propose 'step-level debating' method where multiple debaters discuss each reasoning step to arrive at the correct answer. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can generate superior CoT prompts from a CoT dataset. |
Please Translate Again: Two Simple Experiments on Whether Human-Like Reasoning Helps Translation (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities for many tasks, often by explicitly decomposing the task via Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a multi-step prompt to decompose translation and train models to incorporate intermediate steps. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art on WMT24 data and shows that prompting LLMs to “translate again” and self-refine yields even better results than human-like step-by-step prompting. |
Chain-of-Thought Matters: Improving Long-Context Language Models with Reasoning Path Supervision (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Dawei Zhu, Xiyu Wei, Guangxiang Zhao, Wenhao Wu, Haosheng Zou, Junfeng Ran, null XWang, Lin Sun, Xiangzheng Zhang, Sujian Li
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have highlighted the challenge of handling long-context tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a chain-of-thought framework that teaches models to generate high-quality reasoning paths for enhanced long-context performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework generalizes across most long-context scenarios and amplifys with increasing context length. |
Enhancing Chain-of-Thoughts Prompting with Iterative Bootstrapping in Large Language Models (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting is a technique to enhance the reasoning abilities of Large language models (LLMs) however, the reasoning chains of demonstrations are observed to be prone to errors, which can lead to incorrect reasoning during inference. |
| Approach: | They propose an iterative bootstrapping technique to enhance the reasoning abilities of Large language models (LLMs) by generating a series of reasoning steps to obtain the answer, and using the reasoning chains as exemplars to demonstrate the task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the performance of Large language models (LLMs) on three reasoning tasks on ten datasets. |