Challenge: Existing bidirectional language models lack the ability to utilise future contexts and the pre-determined left-to-right generation order.
Approach: They propose a class of bidirectional language models that are consistent by definition and can be efficiently used both for generation and scoring of sequences.
Outcome: The proposed models are consistent by definition and can be efficiently used both for generation and scoring of sequences.

Similar Papers

Credible without Credit: Domain Experts Assess Generative Language Models (2023.acl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: ChatGPT has been criticized for its lack of accuracy and coherence . authors argue that language models could replace search engines and make college essays obsolete .
Approach: a team of 10 domain experts conducts an initial assessment of language models using 100 expert-written questions.
Outcome: The results show that language models are mixed in their accuracy.
A Systematic Survey and Critical Review on Evaluating Large Language Models: Challenges, Limitations, and Recommendations (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained significant attention due to their capabilities in performing diverse tasks across domains.
Approach: They review the primary challenges and limitations causing inconsistencies in evaluations . early models could generate coherent text but limited to simple tasks .
Outcome: The proposed evaluations are reproducible, reliable, and robust.
Large Language Models: The Need for Nuance in Current Debates and a Pragmatic Perspective on Understanding (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current Large Language Models (LLMs) are unparalleled in their ability to generate grammatically correct, fluent text.
Approach: They argue that LLMs only parrot statistical patterns in training data and that language learning in LLM cannot inform human language learning.
Outcome: The proposed model can generate grammatically correct, fluent text without requiring human intervention.
In What Languages are Generative Language Models the Most Formal? Analyzing Formality Distribution across Languages (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Multilingual generative language models (LMs) are fluent in a large variety of languages.
Approach: They analyze formality distributions of XGLM and BLOOM’s predictions in 5 languages and classify 1,200 generations per language as formal, informal, or incohesive.
Outcome: The proposed models generate a significant amount of informal predictions even when prompted with formal text.
Pragmatically Informative Text Generation (N19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to pragmatics have been used to improve the informativeness of generated text in grounded language learning problems.
Approach: They propose to use pragmatics to improve the informativeness of conditional text models . they propose to apply pragmatic reasoning to more traditional language generation tasks .
Outcome: The proposed methods improve the performance of strong existing systems for abstractive summarization and generation from structured meaning representations.
Can Large Language Models Always Solve Easy Problems if They Can Solve Harder Ones? (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have impressive capabilities, but still suffer from inconsistency issues.
Approach: They develop a ConsisEval benchmark to evaluate LLMs' inconsistency . they find that LLM models can paradoxically fail at easier problems .
Outcome: The proposed model achieves highest consistency score but inconsistent to specific questions due to distraction by redundant information, misinterpretation of questions, etc.
How Hypocritical Is Your LLM judge? Listener-Speaker Asymmetries in the Pragmatic Competence of Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly studied as repositories of linguistic knowledge.
Approach: They compare LLMs’ performance as pragmatic listeners and as pragmatic speakers . they find a robust asymmetry between pragmatic evaluation and pragmatic generation .
Outcome: The proposed models perform better as listeners than speakers, and produce more appropriate language than speakers.
Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models Decoding (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models have shown a powerful ability for text generation, but undesired behaviors such as toxicity and hallucinations can manifest.
Approach: They propose to formalize text generation as a future-constrained generation problem to minimize undesirable behaviors and enforce faithfulness to instructions.
Outcome: The proposed approach is effective across three tasks, including keyword-constrained generation, toxicity reduction, and factual correctness in question-answering.
Factuality of Large Language Models: A Survey (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) are factually incorrect, which limits their applicability in real-world scenarios.
Approach: They analyze existing work to identify major challenges and their associated causes . they propose to evaluate LLMs using a variety of measures to mitigate factual errors .
Outcome: The proposed methods are based on a variety of datasets and proposed strategies to mitigate factual errors.
Pragmatics in the Era of Large Language Models: A Survey on Datasets, Evaluation, Opportunities and Challenges (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: linguistics studies how context influences meaning of language and how people use it to convey implied meanings, emotions, and intentions.
Approach: They analyze task designs, data collection methods, evaluation approaches and their relevance to real-world applications.
Outcome: The findings highlight emerging trends, challenges, and gaps in existing benchmarks . the findings will contribute to more nuanced and context-aware NLP models .

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations