Challenge: Existing benchmarks for logical reasoning in large language models lack language naturalness or limited complexity.
Approach: They propose to use first-order logic annotations to evaluate logical reasoning capabilities of large language models.
Outcome: The proposed dataset evaluates the FOL reasoning ability of supervised fine-tuning on medium-sized language models.

Similar Papers

P-FOLIO: Evaluating and Improving Logical Reasoning with Abundant Human-Written Reasoning Chains (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods on understanding the capabilities of LLMs in logical reasoning rely on binary entailment classification or synthetically derived rationales.
Approach: They propose to annotate a human-annotated dataset consisting of diverse and complex reasoning chains for a set of realistic logical reasoning stories also written by humans.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms existing methods on understanding the capabilities of LLMs in logical reasoning by 10% or more.
Harnessing the Power of Large Language Models for Natural Language to First-Order Logic Translation (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Logic-based approaches to reasoning have lost popularity due to limited scalability and coverage.
Approach: They present a dataset of 28K sentence-level NL-FOL pairs from GPT4 and a LogicLLaMA2-7B/13B fine-tuned on MALLS for NL translation.
Outcome: The proposed model can be used standalone or to correct previously generated rules by GPT3.5.
LogicBench: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work investigating the logical reasoning ability of large language models has focused only on a couple of inference rules of propositional and first-order logics.
Approach: They propose to use a natural language question-answering dataset to evaluate the logical reasoning ability of large language models.
Outcome: The proposed model performs poorly on a range of natural language questions using chain-of-thought prompting.
NL2Logic: AST-Guided Translation of Natural Language into First-Order Logic with Large Language Models (2026.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Structured reasoning approaches that parse first-order logic rules from natural language lack syntax control and semantic faithfulness.
Approach: They propose a structured reasoning paradigm that parses first-order logic rules from natural language and delegates inference to automated solvers.
Outcome: a proposed framework parses first-order logic rules from natural language and delegates inference to automated solvers.
FOL-Traces: Verified First-Order Logic Reasoning Traces at Scale (2026.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to evaluate language models fail to provide structural clarity and verifiable inference.
Approach: They propose to use a large-scale dataset of programmatically verified reasoning traces to evaluate structured logical inference.
Outcome: The proposed model achieves 45.7% accuracy on masked operation prediction and 27% on two-step completion.
Diagnosing the First-Order Logical Reasoning Ability Through LogicNLI (2021.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies have focused on diagnosing LMs' reasoning abilities in natural language understanding tasks.
Approach: They propose a diagnostic method for first-order logic reasoning with a proposed benchmark, LogicNLI.
Outcome: The proposed method disentangles the target FOL reasoning from commonsense inference and can be used to diagnose LMs from four perspectives: accuracy, robustness, generalization, and interpretability.
StructFact: Reasoning Factual Knowledge from Structured Data with Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have made significant strides in natural language processing by leveraging their ability to comprehend and reason with factual knowledge.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate the ability of large language models to reason with structured data for knowledge-intensive tasks.
Outcome: Extensive tests on 10 common LLMs show that they struggle with heterogeneity of structured data during reasoning.
LINC: A Neurosymbolic Approach for Logical Reasoning by Combining Language Models with First-Order Logic Provers (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Logical reasoning is an important task for artificial intelligence, says a new study . many prompting-based strategies to enable large language models fail in subtle and unpredictable ways.
Approach: They propose to reformulate logical reasoning tasks by leveraging large language models . they use a modular neurosymbolic programming approach to translate premises and conclusions from natural language to logic .
Outcome: The proposed approach outperforms open-source models on FOLIO and ProofWriter while showing distinct failure modes.
Exploring Self-supervised Logic-enhanced Training for Large Language Models (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Traditional attempts to enhance the logical reasoning abilities of language models often rely on supervised fine-tuning, limiting their generalization to new tasks or domains.
Approach: They propose a framework for integrating logical reasoning capabilities into LLMs and activating them via in-context learning.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves comparable results to existing models on three language understanding benchmarks.
Entailment-Preserving First-order Logic Representations in Natural Language Entailment (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: First-order logic (FOL) is often used to represent logical entailment, but determining natural language (NL) enanglement using FOL remains a challenge.
Approach: They propose an Entailment-Preserving FOL representations task and a method which trains an NL-to-FOL translator by using the natural language entailment labels as verifiable rewards.
Outcome: The proposed method achieves 1.8–2.7% improvement in EPR and 17.4–20.6% increase in E PR@16 compared to baselines in three datasets.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations