Challenge: Obtaining high-quality labeled data that accurately represents complexity of real-world scenarios can be expensive, time-consuming, or even impractical.
Approach: They propose to use Fréchet Inception Distance to measure distance between judged items and retrieved results.
Outcome: The proposed method improves on a MS MARCO dataset and TREC Deep Learning Tracks query sets.

Similar Papers

On the Effectiveness of Automated Metrics for Text Generation Systems (2022.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation methods lack a sound theoretical foundation for evaluation campaigns . imperfect automated metrics and insufficiently sized test sets are some of the factors that cause uncertainty.
Approach: They propose a theoretical framework that incorporates different sources of uncertainty, such as imperfect automated metrics and insufficiently sized test sets.
Outcome: The proposed model can be leveraged to improve evaluation protocols regarding reliability, robustness, and significance of the evaluation outcome.
Beyond [CLS] through Ranking by Generation (2020.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent work on generative ranking models for Information Retrieval has focused on discriminative methods that learn a similarity function to compare questions and candidates answers.
Approach: They propose to use a language model to train a ranking function that model the semantic similarity of documents and queries instead of discriminative ranking functions.
Outcome: The proposed approaches are as effective as state-of-the-art discriminative models for the answer selection task and show unlikelihood losses are reduced for IR.
On the Limitations of Reference-Free Evaluations of Generated Text (2022.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a recent study has shown that evaluation metrics which accurately estimate the quality of generated text are limited in their ability to evaluate generated text.
Approach: They argue that reference-free metrics are limited in their ability to evaluate generated text . they recommend that they be used as diagnostic tools for analyzing and understanding model behavior .
Outcome: The proposed evaluation metrics are limited in their ability to evaluate generated text . they can be optimized at test time, can be biased against models with similar outputs .
Curious Case of Language Generation Evaluation Metrics: A Cautionary Tale (2020.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a few popular metrics are still used to evaluate language generation systems despite their known limitations.
Approach: They propose to use automatic metrics to evaluate language generation systems . they show that they prefer system outputs to human-authored texts .
Outcome: The proposed metrics are insensitive to correct translations of rare words and can yield high scores when given a single sentence as system output for the entire test set.
Redefining Retrieval Evaluation in the Era of LLMs (2026.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Traditional IR metrics assume that humans examine documents sequentially with diminishing attention to lower ranks.
Approach: They propose a utility-based annotation schema that quantifies positive contribution of relevant passages and negative impact of distracting ones.
Outcome: The proposed metric improves correlation with the end-to-end answer accuracy by up to 36% compared to traditional metrics.
On the Blind Spots of Model-Based Evaluation Metrics for Text Generation (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for text generation evaluation metrics are lacking in robustness analysis.
Approach: They propose to use stress tests to test for errors in text generation evaluation metrics . they find that BERTScore is confused by truncation errors in summarization .
Outcome: The proposed stress tests show that they are insensitive to errors in open-ended generation, translation, and summarization.
A Tutorial on Evaluation Metrics used in Natural Language Generation (2021.naacl-tutorials)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: This tutorial presents the evolution of automatic evaluation metrics to their current state along with emerging trends in this field.
Approach: This tutorial presents the evolution of automatic evaluation metrics to their current state . it aims to assess the extent of scientific progress made and identify areas/components that need improvement .
Outcome: This tutorial presents the evolution of automatic evaluation metrics to their current state along with emerging trends in this field.
Aiming beyond the Obvious: Identifying Non-Obvious Cases in Semantic Similarity Datasets (P19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing datasets for scoring text pairs in terms of semantic similarity contain instances whose resolution differs according to the degree of difficulty.
Approach: They propose to use lexical overlap to distinguish obvious from non-obvious text pairs by focusing on item difficulty and ground-truth labels to characterise existing datasets.
Outcome: The proposed models are based on lexical overlap and ground-truth labels and focus on cases of similarity which require more complex inference.
Spurious Correlations in Reference-Free Evaluation of Text Generation (2022.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent work suggests that reference-free evaluation metrics may rely on spurious correlations with human judgments.
Approach: They propose to use model-based, reference-free evaluation metrics to evaluate natural language generation systems.
Outcome: The proposed metrics achieve high correlations with human judgments, but they may not be robust enough to evaluate their efficacy and robustness.
Towards Explainable Evaluation of Language Models on the Semantic Similarity of Visual Concepts (2022.coling-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in NLP research have focused on robustness and explainability issues of their evaluation strategies.
Approach: They propose to use pre-trained transformers to evaluate semantic similarity for visual vocabularies . they propose to provide explainable metrics for understanding the quality of retrieved instances .
Outcome: The proposed metrics highlight inabilities of widely used evaluation methods and highlight weaknesses in learned linguistic representations.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations