Rescue: Ranking LLM Responses with Partial Ordering to Improve Response Generation (2024.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Customizing LLMs for a specific task involves separating high-quality responses from lower-quality ones. Obtaining a large volume of expert-annotated data is costly for most tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that trains the model to prioritize the best responses from a pool of candidates created for a task using ranking metrics. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is more robust, less sensitive to noise, and can be achieved with limited human annotations or through heuristic methods. |
Similar Papers
K-order Ranking Preference Optimization for Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing list-wise methods focus on optimizing list ranking consistency for LLMs to improve ranking abilities. |
| Approach: | They propose to extend the Plackett-Luce model to accommodate top-K ranking by extending the DPO’s Plact-Lucer model to dynamically determine appropriate K for different samples. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be extended to accommodate top-K ranking and improve training efficiency. |
PaRaDe: Passage Ranking using Demonstrations with LLMs (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Andrew Drozdov, Honglei Zhuang, Zhuyun Dai, Zhen Qin, Razieh Rahimi, Xuanhui Wang, Dana Alon, Mohit Iyyer, Andrew McCallum, Donald Metzler, Kai Hui
| Challenge: | Existing studies show that large language models can be instructed to perform zero-shot passage re-ranking . Existing work like UPR demonstrate promising results for zero- shot ranking using LLMs . |
| Approach: | They propose a demonstration selection strategy based on difficulty rather than semantic similarity . they propose to include only one demonstration in the prompt to improve re-ranking . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves LLM-based re-ranking by adding one demonstration to the prompt. |
Optimizing RAG Rerankers with LLM Feedback via Reinforcement Learning (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current reranking models are optimized on static human annotations in isolation, decoupled from the downstream generation process. |
| Approach: | They propose a reinforcement learning framework that directly aligns reranking with LLM's generation quality. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on knowledge-intensive benchmarks show that RRPO outperforms strong baselines. |
Towards Order Fairness: Mitigating LLMs Order Sensitivity through Dual Group Advantage Optimization (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies attempt to obtain optimal or suboptimal arrangements based on statistical results or using dataset-based search, but these methods increase inference overhead while leaving the model’s inherent order bias unresolved. |
| Approach: | They propose Dual Group Advantage Optimization (DGAO) which aims to improve model accuracy and order stability simultaneously. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves model accuracy and order stability while penalizing order-sensitive or incorrect responses. |
FIRST: Faster Improved Listwise Reranking with Single Token Decoding (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing listwise LLMs lack efficiency as they provide ranking output in the form of a generated ordered sequence of candidate passage identifiers. |
| Approach: | They propose a listwise LLM reranking approach that leverages the first generated identifier to obtain a ranked ordering of the candidates. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach accelerates inference by 50% while maintaining robust ranking performance with gains across BEIR benchmark. |
GroupRank: A Groupwise Paradigm for Effective and Efficient Passage Reranking with LLMs (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Meixiu Long, Duolin Sun, Dan Yang, Yihan Jiao, Lei Liu, Jiahai Wang, Binbin Hu, Yue Shen, Jie Feng, Zhehao Tan, Junjie Wang, Lianzhen Zhong, Jian Wang, Peng Wei, Jinjie Gu
| Challenge: | Existing rankers excel in lexical-matching scenarios, while they struggle with complex queries requiring deep reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a new paradigm that balances flexibility and context awareness to unlock the full potential of groupwise reranking. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves a state-of-the-art 65.2 NDCG@10 on BRIGHT and surpasses baselines by 2.1 points on R2MED while delivering a 6.4 inference speedup. |
ProRank: Prompt Warmup via Reinforcement Learning for Small Language Models Reranking (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in document reranking tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a two-stage training approach for document reranking using reinforcement learning and fine-grained score learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms open-source and proprietary reranking models on BEIR benchmark. |
Selecting Better Samples from Pre-trained LLMs: A Case Study on Question Generation (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Xingdi Yuan, Tong Wang, Yen-Hsiang Wang, Emery Fine, Rania Abdelghani, Hélène Sauzéon, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive prowess in natural language generation. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to select high-quality questions from LLM-generated candidates using round-trip and prompt-based scoring. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach can select high-quality questions from a set of LLM-generated candidates without modification of the underlying model nor rely on human annotations. |
Found in the Middle: Permutation Self-Consistency Improves Listwise Ranking in Large Language Models (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models exhibit positional bias in how they use context, which affects listwise ranking. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to marginalize out different list orders in the prompt to produce an order-independent ranking with less positional bias. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves on five datasets in sorting and passage reranking by 34-52% . it marginalizes out different list orders in the prompt to produce an order-independent ranking . |
Are LLMs Reliable Rankers? Rank Manipulation via Two-Stage Token Optimization (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as rerankers, but their ranking behavior can be steered by small, natural-sounding prompts. |
| Approach: | They propose a token optimization method that crafts concise textual perturbations to consistently promote a target item in LLM-generated rankings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art base-lines and is hard to detect. |