Challenge: Existing benchmarks for large language models focus on intradocument dependencies or dependencies between a small number of documents.
Approach: They propose to use a dataset of fan-out question-answer pairs and human-annotated decompositions with English Wikipedia as the knowledge base to evaluate models' reasoning.
Outcome: The proposed dataset shows that models still have room to improve reasoning over inter-document dependencies in a long context.

Similar Papers

JEMHopQA: Dataset for Japanese Explainable Multi-Hop Question Answering (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a dataset for explainable QA in Japanese is available for many languages, but not in other languages.
Approach: They present a multi-hop QA dataset based on Japanese Wikipedia . it includes question-answer pairs and supporting evidence in the form of derivation triples . they show that the dataset is sufficiently challenging for state-of-the-art LLMs based upon this dataset .
Outcome: The proposed dataset is based on Japanese Wikipedia and can be used to evaluate QA tasks.
WikiHowQA: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multi-Document Non-Factoid Question Answering (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Answering non-factoid questions (NFQs) is a challenging task, requiring passage-level answers that are difficult to construct and evaluate.
Approach: They propose a multi-document NFQA benchmark built on WikiHow, a website dedicated to answering “how-to” questions.
Outcome: The proposed framework includes 11,746 human-written answers along with 74,527 supporting documents.
GPT-Fathom: Benchmarking Large Language Models to Decipher the Evolutionary Path towards GPT-4 and Beyond (2024.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing LLM leaderboards often reference scores reported in other papers without consistent settings and prompts, which may encourage cherry-picking favored settings and for better results.
Approach: They propose an open-source and reproducible LLM evaluation suite built on top of OpenAI Evals that systematically evaluates 10+ leading LLMs and OpenAI’s legacy models on 20+ curated benchmarks across 7 capability categories.
Outcome: The evaluation suite is built on top of OpenAI Evals and evaluates 10+ leading LLMs and OpenAI’s legacy models on 20+ curated benchmarks across 7 capability categories.
MEBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Cross-Document Multi-Entity Question Answering (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-augmented Generation (RAG) systems show promise, but their performance on cross-document MEQA remains underexplored due to the lack of tailored benchmarks.
Approach: They propose a scalable multi-document, multi-entity benchmark to evaluate LLMs' capacity to retrieve, consolidate, and reason over scattered and dense information.
Outcome: The proposed benchmarks show that even advanced models achieve only 59% accuracy on MEBench.
HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering (D18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing question answering (QA) datasets fail to train QA systems to perform complex reasoning and provide explanations for answers.
Approach: They propose a new dataset with 113k Wikipedia-based question-answer pairs with four key features: (1) the questions require finding and reasoning over multiple supporting documents to answer; (2) the questions are diverse and not constrained to any pre-existing knowledge bases or knowledge schemas; (3) the questions provide sentence-level supporting facts required for reasoning; and (4) a type of factoid comparison questions to test QA systems’ ability to extract relevant facts and perform necessary comparison.
Outcome: The proposed dataset has 113k Wikipedia-based question-answer pairs and four key features that make it challenging for the latest QA systems.
DebateQA: Evaluating Question Answering on Debatable Knowledge (2026.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing QA benchmarks that provide fixed answers to debatable questions are inadequate for evaluating their performance.
Approach: They propose to use a dataset of 2,941 debatable questions to assess their ability to provide comprehensive answers to inherently debatably asked questions.
Outcome: The proposed model performs well on 2,941 debatable questions accompanied by human-annotated partial answers that capture a variety of perspectives.
ToolHop: A Query-Driven Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Hop Tool Use (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Effective evaluation of multi-hop tool use is critical for analyzing the understanding, reasoning, and function-calling capabilities of large language models.
Approach: They propose a dataset that provides rigorous evaluation of multi-hop tool use.
Outcome: The proposed model achieves 49.04% accuracy across five model families.
M³GQA: A Multi-Entity Multi-Hop Multi-Setting Graph Question Answering Benchmark (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: GraphRAG systems have achieved remarkable progress in enhancing performance and reliability of large language models.
Approach: They propose a GraphRAG benchmark focusing on multi-entity queries with six settings for comprehensive evaluation.
Outcome: The proposed method can construct diverse data with semantically correct ground-truth reasoning paths.
How Accurate Are LLMs at Multi-Question Answering on Conversational Transcripts? (2025.emnlp-industry)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) are used for question answering over long contexts . high computational costs and latency hinder the process .
Approach: They explore the capabilities of Large Language Models to answer multiple questions based on the same conversational context.
Outcome: The proposed models outperform proprietary and public models in question answering . their results show that they can be cost-effective and transparent .
TableEval: A Real-World Benchmark for Complex, Multilingual, and Multi-Structured Table Question Answering (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing TableQA benchmarks focus on simple flat tables and suffer from data leakage . current benchmarks are monolingual and fail to capture cross-lingual variability .
Approach: They propose a table-based TableQA benchmark to evaluate LLMs on real-world tasks.
Outcome: The proposed benchmarks show that they achieve high agreement with human judgment . the proposed framework improves on the alignment between model responses and reference answers .

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations