Challenge: Existing question answering (QA) datasets fail to train QA systems to perform complex reasoning and provide explanations for answers.
Approach: They propose a new dataset with 113k Wikipedia-based question-answer pairs with four key features: (1) the questions require finding and reasoning over multiple supporting documents to answer; (2) the questions are diverse and not constrained to any pre-existing knowledge bases or knowledge schemas; (3) the questions provide sentence-level supporting facts required for reasoning; and (4) a type of factoid comparison questions to test QA systems’ ability to extract relevant facts and perform necessary comparison.
Outcome: The proposed dataset has 113k Wikipedia-based question-answer pairs and four key features that make it challenging for the latest QA systems.

Similar Papers

Do Multi-Hop Question Answering Systems Know How to Answer the Single-Hop Sub-Questions? (2021.eacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing models fail to answer a large portion of sub-questions . Existing systems have achieved super-human performance .
Approach: They propose to use a neural decomposition model to generate sub-questions for a multi-hop question and extract the corresponding sub-answers.
Outcome: The proposed model is based on a hotpotQA dataset with a multi-hop question and sub-answers.
Understanding Dataset Design Choices for Multi-hop Reasoning (N19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing datasets that explicitly focus on multi-hop reasoning are lacking in learning multi-tasking.
Approach: They propose to use sentence-factored models to solve multi-hop question answering tasks . they find spurious correlations in unmasked versions of WikiHop and HotpotQA .
Outcome: The proposed datasets are used to test models on multi-hop question answering tasks.
JEMHopQA: Dataset for Japanese Explainable Multi-Hop Question Answering (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a dataset for explainable QA in Japanese is available for many languages, but not in other languages.
Approach: They present a multi-hop QA dataset based on Japanese Wikipedia . it includes question-answer pairs and supporting evidence in the form of derivation triples . they show that the dataset is sufficiently challenging for state-of-the-art LLMs based upon this dataset .
Outcome: The proposed dataset is based on Japanese Wikipedia and can be used to evaluate QA tasks.
Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Steps (2020.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing multi-hop question answering datasets do not provide a complete explanation for the reasoning process from the question to the answer.
Approach: They propose a multi-hop question answering dataset that uses structured and unstructured data to test reasoning skills.
Outcome: The proposed dataset ensures multi-hop reasoning while being challenging for multi-models.
MarkQA: A large scale KBQA dataset with numerical reasoning (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing KBQA datasets are insufficient for numerical reasoning . existing KBqa datasets lack multi-hop reasoning and numerical reasoning.
Approach: They propose a task that necessitates the ability to perform multi-hop reasoning and numerical reasoning.
Outcome: The proposed task necessitates the ability to perform multi-hop reasoning and numerical reasoning.
ComQA: A Community-sourced Dataset for Complex Factoid Question Answering with Paraphrase Clusters (N19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: ComQA dataset captures question phenomena and the diverse ways in which they are formulated.
Approach: They propose a large dataset of real user questions that captures question phenomena and the diverse ways in which they are formulated.
Outcome: The proposed dataset can be a driver of future research on factoid question answering (QA).
A Simple Yet Strong Pipeline for HotpotQA (2020.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing models for multi-hop question answering have been proposed with varying complexities.
Approach: They propose to use BERT to identify potentially relevant sentences independently of each other . they feed selected sentences into a standard BERT span prediction model to choose an answer .
Outcome: The proposed pipeline outperforms existing models on hotpotQA and support identification.
FeTaQA: Free-form Table Question Answering (2022.tacl-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing table-based question answering datasets lack advanced information-based questions that require reasoning and integration of information pieces retrieved from structured knowledge sources.
Approach: They propose a dataset with 10K Wikipedia-based table, question, free-form answer, supporting table cells pairs that can be used to generate an answer.
Outcome: The proposed dataset has 10K Wikipedia-based table, question, free-form answer, supporting table cells pairs.
NOAHQA: Numerical Reasoning with Interpretable Graph Question Answering Dataset (2021.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing question answering datasets lack numerical reasoning and reasoning processes . current research on numerical reasoning focuses on simple calculations .
Approach: They propose a conversational and bilingual question answering dataset with numerical reasoning with compound mathematical expressions.
Outcome: The proposed model achieves 55.5 exact match scores while human performance is 89.7.
Unsupervised Multi-hop Question Answering by Question Generation (2021.naacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing training data for multi-hop question answering (QA) is time-consuming and resource-intensive.
Approach: They propose an unsupervised framework that generates human-like multi-hop training data from homogeneous and heterogeneously data sources.
Outcome: The proposed framework achieves 61% and 83% of the supervised learning performance for the HybridQA and HotpotQA datasets.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations