MEBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Cross-Document Multi-Entity Question Answering (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-augmented Generation (RAG) systems show promise, but their performance on cross-document MEQA remains underexplored due to the lack of tailored benchmarks. |
| Approach: | They propose a scalable multi-document, multi-entity benchmark to evaluate LLMs' capacity to retrieve, consolidate, and reason over scattered and dense information. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that even advanced models achieve only 59% accuracy on MEBench. |
Similar Papers
LaoBench: A Large-Scale Multidimensional Lao Benchmark for Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jian Gao, Richeng Xuan, Zhaolu Kang, Dingshi Liao, Wenxin Huang, Zongmou Huang, Yangdi Xu, Bowen Qin, Zheqi He, Xi Yang, null Changjinli, Yonghua Lin
| Challenge: | Existing SEA-focused benchmarks miss Lao-specific cultural grounding and linguistic properties. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-dimensional benchmark for assessing large language models in Lao . they use open-source and held-out subsets to evaluate languages with a hybrid pipeline . |
| Outcome: | LaoBench is the first large-scale, high-quality, and multidimensional benchmark for assessing LLM language understanding and reasoning in Lao. |
MuBench: Assessment of Multilingual Capabilities of Large Language Models Across 61 Languages (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation datasets lack cross-lingual alignment, leaving assessments of multilingual capabilities fragmented in both language and skill coverage. |
| Approach: | They propose to use multilingual consistency as a complementary metric to assess performance bottlenecks and guide model improvement. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model lacks cross-lingual alignment and language coverage gaps between state-of-the-art models. |
MDBench: A Synthetic Multi-Document Reasoning Benchmark Generated with Knowledge Guidance (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multi-document reasoning is an area of increasing relevance given LLM capabilities in handling longer-context inputs, but few benchmarks exist to rigorously examine model behavior in this setting. |
| Approach: | They propose a new dataset for evaluating LLMs on the task of multi-document reasoning that uses condensed structured seed knowledge to modify it through LLM-assisted edits. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method generates document sets and QA examples on a multi-document reasoning task using a synthetic generation process. |
LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understanding (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yushi Bai, Xin Lv, Jiajie Zhang, Hongchang Lyu, Jiankai Tang, Zhidian Huang, Zhengxiao Du, Xiao Liu, Aohan Zeng, Lei Hou, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang, Juanzi Li
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) can only handle texts a few thousand tokens long, limiting their applications on longer sequence inputs, such as books, reports, and codebases. |
| Approach: | They propose a bilingual, multi-task benchmark for long context understanding that extends context windows and more sophisticated memory mechanisms to improve models' long context capabilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms open-source models but struggles on longer contexts. |
AfroBench: How Good are Large Language Models on African Languages? (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Jessica Ojo, Odunayo Ogundepo, Akintunde Oladipo, Kelechi Ogueji, Jimmy Lin, Pontus Stenetorp, David Ifeoluwa Adelani
| Challenge: | Large-scale multilingual evaluations often include only a handful of African languages due to the scarcity of high-quality data and the limited discoverability of existing datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-task benchmark to evaluate the performance of LLMs across 64 African languages, 15 tasks and 22 datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark compares LLMs across 64 African languages, 15 tasks and 22 datasets. |
BenchMAX: A Comprehensive Multilingual Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing multilingual benchmarks focus primarily on language understanding tasks. |
| Approach: | They develop a multi-way multilingual benchmark that measures critical capabilities of large language models across languages. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on BenchMAX reveal uneven utilization of core capabilities across languages, emphasizing the performance gaps that scaling model size alone does not resolve. |
Question Answering over Tabular Data with DataBench: A Large-Scale Empirical Evaluation of LLMs (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are showing emerging abilities, but they are not large enough to assess their capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that compares large language models with open and closed source models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark compares open and closed-source models with open-source and closed source models. |
LongTableBench: Benchmarking Long-Context Table Reasoning across Real-World Formats and Domains (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Liyao Li, Jiaming Tian, Hao Chen, Wentao Ye, Chao Ye, Haobo Wang, Ningtao Wang, Xing Fu, Gang Chen, Junbo Zhao
| Challenge: | Evaluating 52 LLMs reveals that only the strongest models maintain robust performance under increasing context lengths and format diversity. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark for evaluating long-context reasoning over semi-structured tables across diverse formats, tasks, and domains. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms compression-based approaches on tasks requiring semantic integration. |
ACEBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Tool Usage (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Chen Chen, Xinlong Hao, Weiwen Liu, Xu Huang, Xingshan Zeng, Shuai Yu, Dexun Li, Yuefeng Huang, Xiangcheng Liu, Wang Xinzhi, Wu Liu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs’ tool usage face several limitations: limited evaluation scenarios, lacking assessments in real multi-turn dialogue contexts; narrow evaluation dimensions, with insufficient detailed assessments of how LLM use tools; and reliance on LLM or real API executions for evaluation, which introduces significant overhead. |
| Approach: | ACEBench is a benchmark for evaluating tool usage in Large Language Models . it categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent. |
| Outcome: | ACEBench categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent. |
M3-VQA: A Benchmark for Multimodal, Multi-Entity, Multi-Hop Visual Question Answering (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge-based VQA benchmarks focus on coarse-grained categories and simple reasoning over single entities. |
| Approach: | They propose a knowledge-based Visual Question Answering benchmark to enhance multimodality evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark improves evaluation of multimodal large language models in fine-grained multimodal entity understanding and complex multihop reasoning. |