Challenge: Annotated contracts are laborious task performed by companies, law firms, NGOs and the scientific community.
Approach: They present a corpus of 3,764 clauses from German consumer contracts annotated by legal experts with a clause in the contract.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms openly available models in detecting potentially void clauses.

Similar Papers

A Dataset of German Legal Documents for Named Entity Recognition (2020.lrec-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a dataset developed for Named Entity Recognition in German federal court decisions is available under a CC-BY 4.0 license.
Approach: They describe a dataset developed for Named Entity Recognition in German federal court decisions.
Outcome: The proposed dataset was developed for training an NER service for German legal documents in the EU project Lynx.
Annotation and Classification of Relevant Clauses in Terms-and-Conditions Contracts (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Using Large Language Models (LLMs) as foundational models, we propose a new annotation scheme to classify different types of clauses in Terms-and-Conditions contracts.
Approach: They propose to use a new annotation scheme to classify clauses in Terms-and-Conditions contracts to support legal experts in identifying and assessing problematic issues.
Outcome: The proposed annotation scheme achieves accuracies ranging from .79 to .95 on validation tasks.
Answering legal questions from laymen in German civil law system (2024.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies have focused on questions asked by experts, such as lawyers or legal scholars.
Approach: They use a dataset to analyze laymen's legal questions paired with answers from lawyers and grounded to concrete law book paragraphs to find out what limitations exist.
Outcome: The proposed system could help laymen in real situations without understanding law . the proposed system is based on 21k laymen’s legal questions paired with answers from lawyers and grounded to concrete law book paragraphs.
LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English (2022.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Laws and their interpretations, legal arguments and agreements are typically expressed in writing.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate model performance across legal NLU tasks . they also evaluate several generic and legal-oriented models .
Outcome: The proposed model performs better across multiple tasks than previous models.
NESTLE: a No-Code Tool for Statistical Analysis of Legal Corpus (2024.eacl-demo)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a comprehensive statistical analysis of legal corpus requires specialized tools or programming skills.
Approach: They propose a no-code tool for large-scale statistical analysis of legal corpus . NESTLE can extract any type of information that has not been predefined in the IE system .
Outcome: The proposed tool can perform comparable to LexGLUE on 15 Korean precedent IE tasks and 3 legal text classification tasks.
A Corpus for Automatic Readability Assessment and Text Simplification of German (2020.lrec-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Using monolingual-only data, we can automate readability assessment and text simplification of simplified language.
Approach: They present a corpus for automatic readability assessment and automatic text simplification for German using parallel and monolingual data.
Outcome: The proposed corpus is compiled from web sources and contains information on text structure, typography, font style, and images.
CLERC: A Dataset for U. S. Legal Case Retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Analysis Generation (2025.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a dataset of case law is used to train and evaluate models for writing legal analyses . current approaches struggle to find relevant cases and generate legal analyses, authors say .
Approach: They build a dataset of case law to support information retrieval and retrieval-augmented generation.
Outcome: The proposed dataset supports two important backbone tasks: retrieval (IR) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
LEDGAR: A Large-Scale Multi-label Corpus for Text Classification of Legal Provisions in Contracts (2020.lrec-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Contractual provisions are a primary research target in law studies as they constitute the legal essence of a contract.
Approach: They propose to use LEDGAR to construct a multilabel corpus of legal provisions in contracts that is crawled and scraped from the public domain.
Outcome: The proposed corpus is the first freely available corpus of its kind.
Information Extraction from Legal Wills: How Well Does GPT-4 Do? (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Using information extraction from legal wills is an important application of artificial intelligence (AI)
Approach: They propose a manually annotated dataset for Information Extraction (IE) from legal wills . they also use it to evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs)
Outcome: The proposed dataset can be used to evaluate large language models on IE from legal wills . it shows that the model performs reasonably well, but inconsistent outputs and overgeneralization are observed .
Annotation and Automatic Classification of Aspectual Categories (P19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Annotated resource for aspectual classification of German verb tokens in context.
Approach: They present a resource for aspectual classification of German verb tokens in their clausal context.
Outcome: The proposed resource is compared with previous work on German verb tokens using aspectual features compatible with the plurality of aspectual classifications.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations