NESTLE: a No-Code Tool for Statistical Analysis of Legal Corpus (2024.eacl-demo)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a comprehensive statistical analysis of legal corpus requires specialized tools or programming skills. |
| Approach: | They propose a no-code tool for large-scale statistical analysis of legal corpus . NESTLE can extract any type of information that has not been predefined in the IE system . |
| Outcome: | The proposed tool can perform comparable to LexGLUE on 15 Korean precedent IE tasks and 3 legal text classification tasks. |
Similar Papers
LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in English (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Ilias Chalkidis, Abhik Jana, Dirk Hartung, Michael Bommarito, Ion Androutsopoulos, Daniel Katz, Nikolaos Aletras
| Challenge: | Laws and their interpretations, legal arguments and agreements are typically expressed in writing. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate model performance across legal NLU tasks . they also evaluate several generic and legal-oriented models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better across multiple tasks than previous models. |
InternLM-Law: An Open-Sourced Chinese Legal Large Language Model (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | InternLM-Law is a large language model (LLM) tailored for addressing diverse legal tasks related to Chinese laws. |
| Approach: | They introduce a large language model (LLM) tailored for addressing diverse legal tasks related to Chinese laws. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better than existing models in a variety of legal tasks related to Chinese laws. |
A Legal Perspective on Training Models for Natural Language Processing (L18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a significant concern in processing natural language data is the unclear legal status of the input and output data/resources. |
| Approach: | They examine which legal rules apply at relevant steps and how they affect the legal status of the results. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model training process is based on three scenarios . the analysis focuses on which legal rules apply and how they affect the legal status of the results . |
LawBench: Benchmarking Legal Knowledge of Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Zhiwei Fei, Xiaoyu Shen, Dawei Zhu, Fengzhe Zhou, Zhuo Han, Alan Huang, Songyang Zhang, Kai Chen, Zhixin Yin, Zongwen Shen, Jidong Ge, Vincent Ng
| Challenge: | LegalBench evaluated 20 LLMs in 162 legal tasks in 20 countries and jurisdictions. |
| Approach: | They present a comprehensive evaluation of 21 popular Large Language Models and the first comparative analysis of the empirical results. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks are based on the Bloom’s cognitive taxonomy and are compared to 21 popular LLMs. |
NesTools: A Dataset for Evaluating Nested Tool Learning Abilities of Large Language Models (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks on nested tool learning are lacking relevant data instances. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to construct large-scale nested tool calls with different nesting structures using a large-quality dataset. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can be used to evaluate the nested tool learning abilities of large language models (LLMs) in real-world applications. |
Information Extraction from Legal Wills: How Well Does GPT-4 Do? (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using information extraction from legal wills is an important application of artificial intelligence (AI) |
| Approach: | They propose a manually annotated dataset for Information Extraction (IE) from legal wills . they also use it to evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset can be used to evaluate large language models on IE from legal wills . it shows that the model performs reasonably well, but inconsistent outputs and overgeneralization are observed . |
LEDGAR: A Large-Scale Multi-label Corpus for Text Classification of Legal Provisions in Contracts (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Contractual provisions are a primary research target in law studies as they constitute the legal essence of a contract. |
| Approach: | They propose to use LEDGAR to construct a multilabel corpus of legal provisions in contracts that is crawled and scraped from the public domain. |
| Outcome: | The proposed corpus is the first freely available corpus of its kind. |
LegalLens: Leveraging LLMs for Legal Violation Identification in Unstructured Text (2024.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Dor Bernsohn, Gil Semo, Yaron Vazana, Gila Hayat, Ben Hagag, Joel Niklaus, Rohit Saha, Kyryl Truskovskyi
| Challenge: | a recent study focused on detecting legal violations within unstructured textual data . a similar study focused only on associating violations with potentially affected individuals . |
| Approach: | They constructed two datasets using Large Language Models (LLMs) they publicize the results to advance legal natural language processing research . |
| Outcome: | The proposed datasets and the code used for the experiments have been released to advance legal natural language processing (NLP) |
A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on Legal Judgment Prediction (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated great potential for domain-specific applications, such as the law domain. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to investigate LLMs' competence in the law domain by using similar cases and multi-choice options. |
| Outcome: | The proposed solutions can be extended to other domains to facilitate evaluations in other domain. |
IEPile: Unearthing Large Scale Schema-Conditioned Information Extraction Corpus (2024.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models exhibit a significant performance gap in Information Extraction (IE) high-quality instruction data is the vital key for enhancing LLMs' specific capabilities . |
| Approach: | They propose a bilingual (English and Chinese) IE instruction corpus that contains 0.32B tokens. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves the performance of LLMs for IE with zero-shot generalization. |