INarIG: Iterative Non-autoregressive Instruct Generation Model For Word-Level Auto Completion (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models for word-level autocompletion (WLAC) only use human typed sequences as prefixes in decoding module. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel iterative nonautoregressive instruct generation model for WLAC task . it uses human typed sequences and iterating decoding with subwords to fully utilize input information. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is more competent in dealing with low-frequency words, and achieves state-of-the-art results on the WMT22 and benchmark datasets. |
Similar Papers
Rethinking Word-Level Auto-Completion in Computer-Aided Translation (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models for word-level auto-completion (WLAC) do not meet the criterion of good auto-completes. |
| Approach: | They propose a measurable criterion to address the question: what kind of words are good auto-completions? they propose an approach to enhance WLAC performance by promoting adherence to the cri-terion. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms the top-performing system submitted to the WLAC shared tasks in WMT2022 while using significantly smaller model sizes. |
An Empirical Study of Iterative Refinements for Non-autoregressive Translation (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Iterative non-autoregressive (NAR) models have recently demonstrated impressive performance in varied generation tasks, surpassing the autoregressive Transformer. |
| Approach: | They propose a strategy to conduct efficient refinements without performance declines by using two simple metrics to identify potential problems existing in current refinement processes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the autoregressive Transformer by around one BLEU on average. |
Directed Acyclic Transformer Pre-training for High-quality Non-autoregressive Text Generation (2023.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing non-AutoRegressive (NAR) text generation models lack proper pre-training, making them far behind pre-trained autoregressive models. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel pre-training task to promote prediction consistency in non-autoregressive (NAR) generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing pre-trained models and achieves 17 times speedup in throughput. |
Deterministic Non-Autoregressive Neural Sequence Modeling by Iterative Refinement (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Despite its success, neural autoregressive modeling has its weakness in decoding, i.e., finding the most likely sequence. |
| Approach: | They propose a conditional non-autoregressive neural sequence model based on iterative refinement based upon latent variable models and conditional denoising autoencoders. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model significantly speeds up decoding while maintaining the generation quality comparable to the autoregressive counterpart. |
Improving Non-autoregressive Neural Machine Translation with Monolingual Data (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Neural machine translation is usually done via knowledge distillation from an autoregressive (AR) model. |
| Approach: | They leverage large monolingual corpora to improve the NAR model's performance by transferring the autoregressive model' s generalization ability while preventing overfitting. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods on the WMT14 En-De and WMT16 En-Ro news translation tasks show that monolingual data augmentation improves the NAR model to approach the teacher AR model’s performance. |
Auto-Instruct: Automatic Instruction Generation and Ranking for Black-Box Language Models (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Zhihan Zhang, Shuohang Wang, Wenhao Yu, Yichong Xu, Dan Iter, Qingkai Zeng, Yang Liu, Chenguang Zhu, Meng Jiang
| Challenge: | Large language models can perform a wide range of tasks by following natural language instructions without task-specific fine-tuning. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to automatically improve the quality of LLM instructions . they leverage the generative ability of LMS to generate diverse candidate instructions based on a scoring model trained on 575 existing NLP tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method surpasses human-written and LLM-generated instructions on 118 out-of-domain tasks. |
Non-Autoregressive Text Generation with Pre-trained Language Models (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Autoregressive generation models generate tokens in a left-to-right, token-by-token fashion, resulting in lag in inference. |
| Approach: | They propose to use BERT as the backbone of a non-autoregressive generation model for greatly improved performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing non-autoregressive models and achieves competitive performance with many strong autoregressive model. |
DeCoVec: Building Decoding Space based Task Vector for Large Language Models via In-Context Learning (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to steering large language models require fine-tuning or manipulation of internal states, limiting their flexibility and scalability. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that constructs task vectors directly in the decoding space by leveraging in-context learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms standard few-shot baselines on TruthfulQA, Math-500, and AQUA-RAT with gains up to +5.50 accuracy. |
Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation: A Call for Clarity (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Non-autoregressive translation models require a single forward pass to generate the output sequence instead of iteratively producing each predicted token. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a single forward pass to generate the output sequence instead of iteratively producing each predicted token. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models improve translation quality and speed under third-party testing environments. |
GWLAN: General Word-Level AutocompletioN for Computer-Aided Translation (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Computer-aided translation (CAT) is a form of software that assists a human translator in the translation process. |
| Approach: | They propose to use computer-aided translation (CAT) to assist a human translator in the translation process. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can give significantly more accurate predictions than baseline methods on CAT datasets. |