POSQA: Probe the World Models of LLMs with Size Comparisons (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Embodied language comprehension emphasizes that language understanding is not only mental processing in the brain but also involves interactions with the physical and social environment. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a physical object size question to examine the extremity of large language models to test their embodied comprehension. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset shows that even the largest LLMs perform poorly under the zero-shot setting. |
Similar Papers
Can Language Models Understand Physical Concepts? (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing language models do not understand basic physical concepts in the human world. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to transfer embodied knowledge from visual models to LMs . they use visual concepts and embodies concepts learned from interaction with the world . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves comparable performance with scaling up parameters of LMs 134. |
Do LLMs Capture Embodied Cognition and Cultural Variation? Cross-Linguistic Evidence from Demonstratives (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new study examines whether large language models acquire embodied cognition and cultural conventions from training data . demonstratives are a natural lens for evaluating linguistic phenomena that reflect cultural variation . aaron e. duan and j. nà: "the complexity of the language model is a major challenge for LLMs" |
| Approach: | They introduce demonstratives as a probe for grounded knowledge by analyzing 6,400 responses from 320 native speakers. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model fails to understand proximal–distal contrast and shows no cultural differences . the proposed model is a new probe for evaluating embodied cognition and cultural conventions . |
Large Language Models Help Humans Verify Truthfulness – Except When They Are Convincingly Wrong (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for accessing information on the web. |
| Approach: | They conduct experiments with 80 crowdworkers to compare LLMs with search engines . they ask LLM to provide contrastive information to reduce over-reliance on LLM . |
| Outcome: | The results show that LLMs can outperform search engines but not LLM explanations . the study shows that LMS explanations are not reliable replacements for reading retrieved passages compared to search engines alone. |
Exploring Spatial Schema Intuitions in Large Language and Vision Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models excel in varied NLP tasks, but lack a direct connection between sensory perception and physical action. |
| Approach: | They examine whether large language models capture implicit human intuitions about building blocks of language . they employ spatial cognitive foundations developed through early sensorimotor experiences . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model captures implicit human intuitions about building blocks of language without a tangible connection to embodied experiences. |
Large Language Models: The Need for Nuance in Current Debates and a Pragmatic Perspective on Understanding (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current Large Language Models (LLMs) are unparalleled in their ability to generate grammatically correct, fluent text. |
| Approach: | They argue that LLMs only parrot statistical patterns in training data and that language learning in LLM cannot inform human language learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate grammatically correct, fluent text without requiring human intervention. |
Working Memory Identifies Reasoning Limits in Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using large language models, we examine the limitations of their cognitive capabilities and their working memory. |
| Approach: | They examine the limitations of large language models from a scaling perspective . they also assess various prompting strategies, revealing their diverse impacts on LLM performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform poorly on n-back tasks and on prompting strategies. |
Assessing the Capabilities of Large Language Models in Coreference: An Evaluation (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are a new approach to coreference resolution, but their performance is not yet fully understood. |
| Approach: | They propose that future efforts should improve scope, data, and evaluation methods of traditional coreference research to adapt to the development of LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve scope, data, and evaluation methods of traditional coreference research to adapt to the development of LLMs. |
SCOP: Evaluating the Comprehension Process of Large Language Models from a Cognitive View (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | despite the potential of large language models, it is difficult to fully count on them in real-world scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose to examine how LLMs perform during the comprehension process from a cognitive perspective. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model analyzes how LLMs perform during the comprehension process from a cognitive perspective. |
Penetrative AI: Making LLMs Comprehend the Physical World (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a range of tasks. |
| Approach: | They explore how LLMs can be extended to interact with and reason about the physical world through IoT sensors and actuators, a concept that they call "Penetrative AI". |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach extends LLMs' capabilities to interact with and reason about the physical world through IoT sensors and actuators. |
Out-of-Context Reasoning in Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a lightweight technique trains only new token embeddings on axioms and evaluates them on unseen tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a lightweight technique that trains only new token embeddings on axioms . they train only new embeddables and evaluate them on unseen tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed technique trains only new token embeddings on axioms and evaluates them on unseen tasks. |