SciReviewGen: A Large-scale Dataset for Automatic Literature Review Generation (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing literature review models have addressed literature review generation, but lack of large-scale datasets has been a stumbling block. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a large-scale dataset to evaluate automatic literature review generation models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate summaries comparable to human-written reviews while lacking detailed information. |
Similar Papers
Hierarchical Catalogue Generation for Literature Review: A Benchmark (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Scientific literature review generation aims to extract and organize important information from an abundant collection of reference papers and produces corresponding reviews while lacking a clear and logical hierarchy. |
| Approach: | They propose a task to generate a hierarchical catalogue of a review paper given various references by using a database of 7.6k literature review catalogues and 389k reference papers. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method produces a hierarchical catalogue of a review paper given various references. |
ArxivDIGESTables: Synthesizing Scientific Literature into Tables using Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Benjamin Newman, Yoonjoo Lee, Aakanksha Naik, Pao Siangliulue, Raymond Fok, Juho Kim, Daniel Weld, Joseph Chee Chang, Kyle Lo
| Challenge: | Using language models (LMs) can generate literature review tables by decomposing it into separate schema and value generation steps. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages language models to perform literature review table generation by decomposing it into separate schema and value generation steps. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework decomposes the task into two sub-tasks: schema generation and value generation. |
Large Language Models for Automated Literature Review: An Evaluation of Reference Generation, Abstract Writing, and Review Composition (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are a promising solution to automate literature review writing tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to automatically evaluate the performance of large language models in three key tasks of literature review writing: reference generation, abstract writing, and literature review composition. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework assesses the hallucination rates in generated references and measures the semantic coverage and factual consistency of the literature summaries and compositions against human-written counterparts. |
Unsupervised Opinion Summarization as Copycat-Review Generation (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work on opinion summarization has focused on extracting fragments from reviews, but we use novel sentences to generate abstractive summaries. |
| Approach: | They propose an abstractive summarizer which does not use summaries in training and is trained end-to-end on a large collection of reviews. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model produces fluent and coherent summaries reflecting consensus opinions on Amazon and Yelp reviews. |
SciXGen: A Scientific Paper Dataset for Context-Aware Text Generation (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Generating texts in scientific papers requires not only capturing the content contained within the given input but also frequently acquiring the external information called context. |
| Approach: | They propose a task of context-aware text generation in the scientific domain to exploit the contributions of context in generated texts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset comprehensively benchmarks the efficacy of the proposed dataset in generating description and paragraph. |
MReD: A Meta-Review Dataset for Structure-Controllable Text Generation (2022.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new text generation dataset is needed to controllable text summarization, but it lacks the domain knowledge. |
| Approach: | They propose to use existing text generation datasets to leverage input and control signals . they propose to annotate each meta-review sentence manually with a control signal . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can be used to control the structure of a text generation dataset . it can be applied to a variety of tasks, including a task with a large number of meta-review sentences . |
CodeReviewQA: The Code Review Comprehension Assessment for Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | State-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive code generation capabilities but struggle with real-world software engineering tasks such as revising source code to address code reviews. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to bridge both technical and conversational contexts by decomposing the generation task of code refinement into three essential reasoning steps. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark exposes specific model weaknesses in code review comprehension disentangled from their generative automated code refinement results. |
SurveyGen: Quality-Aware Scientific Survey Generation with Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Automated survey generation is a key task in scientific document processing due to lack of standardized evaluation datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose a survey-based framework that integrates quality indicators into literature retrieval to assess higher-quality sources. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enhances the standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipeline and enables human-guided writing. |
Text-to-Text Automatic Story Generation: A Survey (2026.eacl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Automated story generation aims to produce coherent, engaging, and contextually consistent narratives with minimal or no human involvement . despite advances in large language models, maintaining narrative coherence, character consistency, storyline diversity, and plot controllability in generating stories is still challenging. |
| Approach: | They propose to develop new evaluation metrics and better data sets to support automatic story generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation metrics and better datasets will improve narrative coherence and consistency and explore practical applications of story generation. |
Judge the Judges: A Large-Scale Evaluation Study of Neural Language Models for Online Review Generation (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods for natural language generation are inadequate . distinguishing machine-generated text is challenging even for human evaluators . |
| Approach: | They compare human-based evaluators with automated evaluation procedures . they find human evaluers do not correlate well with discriminative evalators . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation methods are compared with a dozen state-of-the-art generators for online product reviews. |