Characterizing Mechanisms for Factual Recall in Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Language Models often integrate facts they memorized with new information that appears in a given context, causing competition within the model. |
| Approach: | They investigate distributional and mechanistic determinants of LM behavior in a dataset that queries for knowledge of world capitals . they use head attribution to identify individual attention heads that either promote the memorized answer or the in-context answer in the logits . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can increase the rate of generating the in-context answer to 88% of the time by scaling up or down the value vector of individual attention heads at runtime. |
Similar Papers
From n-gram to Attention: How Model Architectures Learn and Propagate Bias in Language Modeling (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current research on bias in language models focuses on data quality, not temporal influences of data. |
| Approach: | They propose a methodology to interpret the interaction between training data and model architecture in bias propagation during language modeling. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method analyzes the interaction between training data and model architecture in bias propagation during language modeling. |
Learning vs Retrieval: The Role of In-Context Examples in Regression with Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on in-context learning mechanisms are not consistent . current research identifies two main approaches to explain the ICL mechanism . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for evaluating in-context learning mechanisms by focusing on regression tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can solve regression problems and then measure the extent to which the LLM retrieves its internal knowledge versus learning from in-context examples. |
How Do Multilingual Language Models Remember Facts? (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior research has focused on English monolingual models, but how these mechanisms generalize to non-English languages remains unexplored. |
| Approach: | They analyze three multilingual LLMs to find out how they can generalize recall mechanisms . they find that subject enrichment is language-independent, object extraction is language dependent . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better in multilingual contexts than in English models . the model is more efficient in multi-lingual context, but it is more complex in multilinguistic models compared to English models. |
Promote, Suppress, Iterate: How Language Models Answer One-to-Many Factual Queries (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | To answer one-to-many factual queries, a language model must simultaneously recall knowledge and avoid repeating previous answers. |
| Approach: | They propose a promote-then-suppress mechanism that enables LMs to recall all answers and suppress previously generated ones. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model first recalls all answers, and then suppresses previously generated ones. |
Unveiling Factual Recall Behaviors of Large Language Models through Knowledge Neurons (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in Large Language Models have underscored their exceptional reasoning prowess with natural language understanding across a broad spectrum of tasks. |
| Approach: | They examine whether Large Language Models actively recall or retrieve their internal repositories of factual knowledge when faced with reasoning tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves reasoning performance while suppressing it leads to notable degradation. |
Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have focused on identifying where factual knowledge is encoded in the network, but little is known about how it is extracted from the model parameters during inference. |
| Approach: | They examine how factual associations are stored and retrieved internally in LMs . they use attention edges to identify critical points where information propagates to the prediction . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model aggregates information about subject and relation to predict the correct attribute . the model “queries” the enriched subject to extract the attribute based on the proposed model . |
Rethinking the Role of Scale for In-Context Learning: An Interpretability-based Case Study at 66 Billion Scale (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | 70% of attention heads and 20% of the feed forward networks can be removed with minimal decline in task performance. |
| Approach: | They propose to investigate whether in-context learning is not uniform across all components of a large language model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can remove 70% of attention heads and 20% of feed forward networks with minimal decline in task performance. |
Identifying Semantic Induction Heads to Understand In-Context Learning (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance, but lack of transparency in their inference logic raises concerns about their trustworthiness. |
| Approach: | They conduct a detailed analysis of the operations of attention heads to understand their in-context learning of LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed analysis of attention heads reveals that they increase the output logits of object tokens and recall objects . the proposed model is a novel approach to understand the in-context learning of large language models. |
Retentive or Forgetful? Diving into the Knowledge Memorizing Mechanism of Language Models (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
Boxi Cao, Qiaoyu Tang, Hongyu Lin, Shanshan Jiang, Bin Dong, Xianpei Han, Jiawei Chen, Tianshu Wang, Le Sun
| Challenge: | Pre-trained language models have shown remarkable memory formation, but vanilla networks without pre-training suffer catastrophic forgetting problem. |
| Approach: | They conduct experiments to investigate the retentive-forgetful contradiction between vanilla and pre-trained language models by controlling the target knowledge types, learning strategies and learning schedules. |
| Outcome: | The results show that pre-trained language models are forgetful and pre-training leads to retentive models . |
Tracing and Dissecting How LLMs Recall Factual Knowledge for Real World Questions (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have shown promising ability to perform commonsense reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a two-dimensional analysis framework that incorporates token back-tracing and token decoding to uncover how LLMs conduct factual knowledge recall. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework shows that LLMs lack relevant knowledge but struggle to select the most accurate information based on context during the retrieval and rerank phase. |