| Challenge: | Recent efforts in natural language processing (NLP) commonsense reasoning research have produced a number of new datasets and benchmarks. |
| Approach: | They propose a manually-curated, multi-task benchmark that evaluates models' ability to apply commonsense reasoning in the context of six real-world NLP tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates the ability of models to apply commonsense reasoning in the context of six real-world NLP tasks. |
Similar Papers
Commonsense Reasoning for Natural Language Processing (2020.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In this tutorial, we will outline the various types of commonsense knowledge and discuss techniques to gather and represent commonsence knowledge. |
| Approach: | This tutorial will provide researchers with the critical foundations and recent advances in commonsense representation and reasoning. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial will outline the various types of commonsense and discuss techniques to gather and represent commonsence knowledge while highlighting the challenges specific to this type of knowledge (e.g., reporting bias). |
Improving Unsupervised Commonsense Reasoning Using Knowledge-Enabled Natural Language Inference (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent methods based on pre-trained language models have shown strong supervised performance on commonsense reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a common framework to solve commonsense reasoning tasks using a dataset from NLI. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art unsupervised performance on two commonsense reasoning tasks. |
COM2SENSE: A Commonsense Reasoning Benchmark with Complementary Sentences (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in pretrained language models have shown promising results on commonsense reasoning benchmark datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose a commonsense reasoning benchmark dataset with 4k sentence pairs . they propose 'gamified' model-in-the-loop setup to incentivize challenging samples . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that the proposed model achieves 71% standard accuracy and 51% pairwise accuracy, well below human performance. |
Proceedings of the First Workshop on Commonsense Inference in Natural Language Processing (D19-60)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Workshop on Commonsense Inference in Natural Language Processing focuses on commonsense knowledge representation and application in NLP tasks. |
| Approach: | COIN is a workshop on commonsense inference in natural language processing . workshop included two shared tasks on reading comprehension using commonsensense knowledge . |
| Outcome: | the workshop focused on modeling commonsense knowledge and commonsensing in natural language processing tasks. |
Commonsense Inference in Natural Language Processing (COIN) - Shared Task Report (D19-60)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | The workshop on Commonsense Inference in NLP (COIN) evaluated text understanding systems' ability to draw inferences about facts that are not mentioned in the text, but that are assumed to be common ground. |
| Approach: | They propose to use commonsense knowledge to evaluate systems' ability to answer questions/queries about a text. |
| Outcome: | The proposed tasks evaluated systems in two contexts: Commonsense Inference and Commonsensible Inference. |
On the Consistency of Commonsense in Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations of commonsense for large language models focus on downstream knowledge tasks, failing to probe whether LLMs truly understand and utilize knowledge or merely memorize it. |
| Approach: | They propose to automatically construct a large benchmark named CoCo which measures LLMs’ knowledge memorization, comprehension, and application and examines the consistency between these tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark systematically assesses LLMs’ knowledge memorization, comprehension, and application and examines the consistency between these tasks. |
Every Answer Matters: Evaluating Commonsense with Probabilistic Measures (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Qi Cheng, Michael Boratko, Pranay Kumar Yelugam, Tim O’Gorman, Nalini Singh, Andrew McCallum, Xiang Li
| Challenge: | Existing commonsense evaluations are often posed as multiple-choice questions, allowing models to exploit systematic biases. |
| Approach: | They propose a generative task that evaluates common sense via multiple open-ended generations and a method that strongly correlates with human judgments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms strong language model baselines on a dataset of human and machine common sense. |
A Systematic Study and Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Benchmark Datasets (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, M Saiful Bari, Mizanur Rahman, Md Amran Hossen Bhuiyan, Shafiq Joty, Jimmy Huang
| Challenge: | Currently, the evaluation of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT in academic datasets is difficult due to the difficulty of evaluating the generative outputs produced by this model against the ground truth. |
| Approach: | They evaluate ChatGPT across 140 tasks and analyze 255K responses it generates in academic datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well on 140 tasks and generates 255K responses in these datasets. |
HellaSwag-Pro: A Large-Scale Bilingual Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs in Commonsense Reasoning (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Xiaoyuan Li, Moxin Li, Rui Men, Yichang Zhang, Keqin Bao, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Dayiheng Liu, Junyang Lin
| Challenge: | Existing studies show that large language models are robust in commonsense reasoning . however, some variations in questions can lead to incorrect responses . |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale bilingual benchmark consisting of 11,200 cases . they conduct extensive experiments on 41 representative LLMs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark systematically evaluates the robustness of large language models in commonsense reasoning. |
LOGICAL-COMMONSENSEQA: A Benchmark for Logical Commonsense Reasoning (2026.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | LOGICAL-COMMONSENSEQA benchmarks evaluate commonsense reasoning as logical composition over pairs of atomic statements . commonsensible reasoning is central to human cognition and a long-standing challenge in artificial intelligence and natural language understanding. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that reframes commonsense reasoning as logical composition over pairs of atomic statements using plausibility-level operators. |
| Outcome: | LOGICAL-COMMONSENSEQA exposes fundamental reasoning limitations and provides a framework for advancing compositional commonsense reasoning. |