| Challenge: | Autoregressive (AR) models can only generate target sequence word-by-word due to the AR mechanism and suffer from slow inference. |
| Approach: | This tutorial provides an introduction to non-autoregressive sequence generation. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial explains how to generate non-autoregressive sequence generation models. |
Similar Papers
Non-Autoregressive Sequence Generation (2022.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Non-autoregressive sequence generation (NAR) models generate output sequences in parallel to speed up generation process. |
| Approach: | This tutorial provides a thorough introduction and review of non-autoregressive sequence generation . it aims to generate the entire or partial output sequences in parallel to speed up the generation process . |
| Outcome: | This tutorial provides a thorough introduction and review of non-autoregressive sequence generation . it aims to reduce the performance gap between state-of-the-art models due to lack of modeling power . |
A Study of Non-autoregressive Model for Sequence Generation (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Non-autoregressive (NAR) models generate all tokens in parallel, resulting in faster generation speed compared to autoregressive models. |
| Approach: | They propose to use knowledge distillation and source-target alignment to bridge the gap between NAR and autoregressive models in various tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed techniques can speed up NAR models in some tasks but not all . the proposed techniques reduce target token dependency while allowing for faster inference . |
An Empirical Study of Iterative Refinements for Non-autoregressive Translation (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Iterative non-autoregressive (NAR) models have recently demonstrated impressive performance in varied generation tasks, surpassing the autoregressive Transformer. |
| Approach: | They propose a strategy to conduct efficient refinements without performance declines by using two simple metrics to identify potential problems existing in current refinement processes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the autoregressive Transformer by around one BLEU on average. |
Tree-Structured Non-Autoregressive Decoding for Sequence-to-Sequence Text Generation (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Autoregressive Transformers suffer from high inference latency due to sequential token generation. |
| Approach: | They propose a tree-structured non-autoregressive decoding paradigm that bridges autoregressive and non-automatic decoding. |
| Outcome: | The proposed paradigm outperforms autoregressive and non-autoregressive decoding in machine translation and paraphrase generation. |
Deterministic Non-Autoregressive Neural Sequence Modeling by Iterative Refinement (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Despite its success, neural autoregressive modeling has its weakness in decoding, i.e., finding the most likely sequence. |
| Approach: | They propose a conditional non-autoregressive neural sequence model based on iterative refinement based upon latent variable models and conditional denoising autoencoders. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model significantly speeds up decoding while maintaining the generation quality comparable to the autoregressive counterpart. |
FlowSeq: Non-Autoregressive Conditional Sequence Generation with Generative Flow (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Neural sequence-to-sequence models are autoregressive, meaning they factor the joint probability of the output sequence into the product of probabilities over the next to-ken. |
| Approach: | They propose a non-autoregressive sequence generation model using latent variables . they use generative flow to model complex distributions using neural networks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs comparable to state-of-the-art models and has constant decoding time w.r.t the sequence length. |
JANUS: Joint Autoregressive and Non-autoregressive Training with Auxiliary Loss for Sequence Generation (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to train autoregressive and non-autoregressive models only consider relevance of model parameters, ignoring correlations between the two manners. |
| Approach: | They propose a joint autoregressive and non-autoregressive training method using aUxiliary losS to enhance the model performance in both AR and NAR manners simultaneously. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the model performance in both AR and NAR manners and reduces the inference latency. |
Exploring Non-Autoregressive Text Style Transfer (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for text style transfer use autoregressive decoding, but they are slow and low parallelizability. |
| Approach: | They propose a base NAR model by directly adapting the common training scheme from its AutoRegressive counterpart. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model sacrifices performance due to lack of conditional dependence between output tokens . knowledge distillation, contrastive learning, and iterative decoding are employed to improve the model . |
Non-Autoregressive Text Generation with Pre-trained Language Models (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Autoregressive generation models generate tokens in a left-to-right, token-by-token fashion, resulting in lag in inference. |
| Approach: | They propose to use BERT as the backbone of a non-autoregressive generation model for greatly improved performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing non-autoregressive models and achieves competitive performance with many strong autoregressive model. |
Non-Autoregressive Machine Translation: It’s Not as Fast as it Seems (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Efficient machine translation models are commercially important as they can increase inference speeds, reduce costs and carbon emissions. |
| Approach: | They compare NAR models with autoregressive models to evaluate their performance . they point out flaws in evaluation methodology and argue for consistent evaluation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is faster on GPUs, but slower under more realistic usage conditions. |