When More Data Hurts: A Troubling Quirk in Developing Broad-Coverage Natural Language Understanding Systems (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Elias Stengel-Eskin, Emmanouil Antonios Platanios, Adam Pauls, Sam Thomson, Hao Fang, Benjamin Van Durme, Jason Eisner, Yu Su
| Challenge: | In natural language understanding systems, users’ evolving needs necessitate the addition of new features over time, indexed by new symbols added to the meaning representation space. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a small set of new symbols to build broad-coverage NLU systems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on two prototypical NLU tasks: intent recognition and semantic parsing. |
Similar Papers
Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understanding (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new large-scale NLI benchmark dataset is presented to test models on a variety of popular NLIs. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale NLI benchmark dataset that is iteratively compared with a human-and-model-in-the-loop procedure. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can be applied in a never-ending learning scenario, becoming a moving target for NLU, rather than a static benchmark that will quickly saturate. |
What Will it Take to Fix Benchmarking in Natural Language Understanding? (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Evaluation for many natural language understanding (NLU) tasks is broken due to unreliable and biased systems scoring so high on standard benchmarks. |
| Approach: | They argue that current benchmarks fail at four criteria for evaluation . they argue that adversarial data collection does not address the causes of failures . |
| Outcome: | The proposed frameworks fail at four criteria, and adversarial data collection does not address the causes of these failures, the authors argue . restoring a healthy evaluation ecosystem will require significant progress in the design of benchmark datasets, reliability with which they are annotated, their size, and the ways they handle social bias. |
Adaptation Odyssey in LLMs: Why Does Additional Pretraining Sometimes Fail to Improve? (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In the last decade, the generalization and adaptation abilities of deep learning models were evaluated on fixed training and test distributions. |
| Approach: | They propose to train large language models on unlabeled text corpora and train them online. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model training on a text domain could degrade its perplexity on the test portion of the same domain. |
Stubborn Lexical Bias in Data and Models (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work has focused on spurious correlations between features and labels in training data . but, we find strong evidence of corresponding bias in the trained models . |
| Approach: | They propose a method to reduce spurious correlations in training data by reweighting it using a large pool of extracted features. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces spurious correlations in training data, but still finds strong evidence of bias in trained models. |
Chasing the Tail with Domain Generalization: A Case Study on Frequency-Enriched Datasets (2022.aacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In academic research, natural language understanding tasks are typically defined by creating annotated datasets in which each utterance is encountered once. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that explicitly uses utterance frequency in training data to learn models that are more robust to unknown distributions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach shows up to 7.02% relative improvement over baselines on the tail data. |
Unsupervised training data re-weighting for natural language understanding with local distribution approximation (2022.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a distribution mismatch between offline training and live data can cause biases . cyclic seasonality shifts, and changing pool of users can contribute to this problem . |
| Approach: | They propose an unsupervised approach to mitigate offline training data sampling bias . they propose a local distribution approximation in the pre-trained embedding space . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach mitigates the offline training data sampling bias in multiple NLU tasks without additional annotation. |
Do Neural Language Models Overcome Reporting Bias? (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that pre-trained language models can overcome reporting bias by estimating the plausibility of rare but unspoken facts. |
| Approach: | They revisit the experiments conducted by Gordon and Van Durme (2013) . they find that pre-trained language models overestimate the very rare . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach overestimates the rare at the expense of the rare, while minimizing reporting bias. |
How Much Do Language Models Copy From Their Training Data? Evaluating Linguistic Novelty in Text Generation Using RAVEN (2023.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current language models generate high-quality text, but are they copying it or have they learned generalizable linguistic abstractions? |
| Approach: | They propose a suite of analyses for assessing the novelty of generated text . they focus on sequential structure (n-grams) and syntactic structure (syntactical structure). |
| Outcome: | The proposed model-generated text is as novel as the baseline human-generated model- generated text, but it is copied substantially, the authors show . |
Climbing towards NLU: On Meaning, Form, and Understanding in the Age of Data (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a priori, large neural language models are described as understanding or capturing meaning on tasks that are ostensibly meaningsensitive. |
| Approach: | They argue that a system trained only on form has no way to learn meaning . they argue that this is due to a misunderstanding of the relationship between form and meaning - which is a misconception in NLP . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can't learn meaning because it only uses form as training data, the authors argue . they argue that a clear understanding of the distinction between form and meaning will guide the field towards better science around natural language understanding. |
Lost in Inference: Rediscovering the Role of Natural Language Inference for Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In the recent past, a popular way of evaluating natural language understanding was to consider a model’s ability to perform natural language inference (NLI) tasks. |
| Approach: | They focus on five different NLI benchmarks across six models of different scales and examine how their accuracies develop during training. |
| Outcome: | The softmax distributions of models align with human label distributions in cases where statements are ambiguous or vague. |