How Much Do Language Models Copy From Their Training Data? Evaluating Linguistic Novelty in Text Generation Using RAVEN (2023.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current language models generate high-quality text, but are they copying it or have they learned generalizable linguistic abstractions? |
| Approach: | They propose a suite of analyses for assessing the novelty of generated text . they focus on sequential structure (n-grams) and syntactic structure (syntactical structure). |
| Outcome: | The proposed model-generated text is as novel as the baseline human-generated model- generated text, but it is copied substantially, the authors show . |
Similar Papers
Language Model Evaluation Beyond Perplexity (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a nascent literature on probing language models has focused on studying linguistic phenomena. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for evaluating the fit of language models to natural language tendencies. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates language models to the tendencies of natural language . it shows that the models learn only a subset of the tendancies considered . |
The Curious Decline of Linguistic Diversity: Training Language Models on Synthetic Text (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new study examines the effects of training language models on synthetic data generated by their predecessors. |
| Approach: | They propose to use recursive finetuning techniques to assess linguistic diversity of models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metrics show a decrease in diversity of model outputs through successive iterations, especially for tasks demanding high levels of creativity. |
Overestimation of Syntactic Representation in Neural Language Models (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Several testing methodologies have been developed to probe models’ syntactic representations. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to determine syntactic structure by training a model on strings generated according to a template and testing its ability to distinguish between similar ones with different syntax. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reproduces positive results with two non-syntactic baseline language models: an n-gram model and an LSTM model trained on scrambled inputs. |
Evaluating n-Gram Novelty of Language Models Using Rusty-DAWG (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new study examines how novel language models generate training text . large LMs and constrained decoding strategies both decrease novelty . |
| Approach: | They develop a novel search tool inspired by genomic data to find n-grams in training data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed tool can search for n-grams over a corpus in constant time w.r.t. large LMs and more constrained decoding strategies both decrease novelty. |
The Amazing World of Neural Language Generation (2020.emnlp-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent years have seen a paradigm shift in neural text generation due to advances in deep contextual language modeling and transfer learning. |
| Approach: | They will discuss how and why NLG models succeed/fail at generating coherent text. |
| Outcome: | This paper will discuss how and why these models succeed/fail at generating coherent text, and provide insights on several applications. |
On the Multilingual Capabilities of Very Large-Scale English Language Models (2022.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs) have been scaled to unprecedented sizes in the history of machine learning. |
| Approach: | They investigate the potential and limits of Generative Pre-trained Transformers in three tasks . they find it can be almost as useful for many languages as it is for English . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can perform tasks in five different languages, and its potential is explored . it can learn from a few examples "via text interaction" and is scalable to many languages . |
Synthetic Data in the Era of Large Language Models (2025.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | 'synthetic data' is a data generated with the assistance of large language models to make dataset construction faster and cheaper. |
| Approach: | This tutorial seeks to build a shared understanding of recent progress in synthetic data generation from NLP and related fields by grouping and describing major methods, applications, and open problems. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial will describe methods, applications, and open problems that have been developed and are being used to improve the quality and efficiency of synthetic data generation. |
Linguistic and Embedding-Based Profiling of Texts Generated by Humans and Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have focused on using LLMs to classify text as either human-written or machine-generated . |
| Approach: | They characterize human-written and machine-generated texts using a set of linguistic features across different linguistic levels such as morphology, syntax, and semantics. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model reveals that human-written texts exhibit simpler syntactic structures and more diverse semantic content. |
Evaluating Language Models as Synthetic Data Generators (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Seungone Kim, Juyoung Suk, Xiang Yue, Vijay Viswanathan, Seongyun Lee, Yizhong Wang, Kiril Gashteovski, Carolin Lawrence, Sean Welleck, Graham Neubig
| Challenge: | Prior studies have focused on developing effective data generation methods, but lack systematic comparison of different LMs as data generators in a unified setting. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a benchmark to compare language models' data generation abilities against a set of standardized settings and metrics. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark provides standardized settings and metrics to evaluate LMs’ data generation abilities. |
Low-Perplexity LLM-Generated Sequences and Where To Find Them (2025.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly applied across various domains, but the ways they leverage their training data during inference remains only partially understood. |
| Approach: | They propose a systematic approach that analyzes low-perplexity sequences and traces them back to their sources in the training data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipeline extracts low-perplexity sequences across diverse topics while avoiding degeneration, then trace them back to their sources in the training data. |