A Rationale-Centric Framework for Human-in-the-loop Machine Learning (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results show that RDL leads to significant prediction benefits on both in-distribution and out-of-district tests, especially for few-shot learning scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a rational-centric framework with human-in-the-loop to exploit spurious associations and bias models towards generally applicable underlying distributions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework leads to significant prediction benefits on in-distribution and out-of-district tests, compared to state-of the-art benchmarks. |
Similar Papers
RubricBench: Aligning Model-Generated Rubrics with Human Standards (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Junyi Zhou, Qiyuan Zhang, Yufei Wang, Fuyuan Lyu, Yidong Ming, Can Xu, Qingfeng Sun, Kai Zheng, Peng Kang, Xue Liu, Chen Ma
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks lack discriminative complexity and ground-truth rubric annotations required for rigorous evaluation. |
| Approach: | They propose a curated benchmark with 1,147 pairwise comparisons to assess the reliability of rubric-based evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that they support diverse domains, exhibit discriminative ability, provide high-quality annotations, and include human-authored rubrics. |
Can Rationalization Improve Robustness? (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models that generate rationales before making predictions can ignore noise or adversarially added text by simply masking it out of the generated rationale. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a 'rationalizethen-predict' framework to generate subsets of input to generate rationales and then make predictions using them. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models improve robustness over AddText attacks while struggling in certain scenarios. |
What to Learn, and How: Toward Effective Learning from Rationales (2022.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Increasing interest in learning from rationales has led to the use of human-annotated explanations to inject useful inductive biases into models. |
| Approach: | They propose several novel loss functions and learning strategies to exploit human rationales to augment model prediction accuracy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed learning strategies improve on three datasets with human rationales and show that they are more efficient than baselines. |
Knowledgeable In-Context Tuning: Exploring and Exploiting Factual Knowledge for In-Context Learning (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have explored multiple aspects that affect the performance of large language models (LLMs) such as input-output mapping, extensive data resources, and the ability to train on labeled examples. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that injects knowledge into LLMs during continual self-supervised pre-training and judiciously selects examples with high knowledge relevance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms baseline models and improves by more than 13% and 7% on text classification and question-answering tasks. |
A Rationale-centric Counterfactual Data Augmentation Method for Cross-Document Event Coreference Resolution (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing state-of-the-art event coreference resolution systems rely on spurious and spurious associations in the input mention pair text. |
| Approach: | They propose a rationale-centric counterfactual data augmentation method that leverages the debiasing capability of counterfact data haussed by LLM-in-the-loop to mitigate spurious association while emphasizing causation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art on three popular cross-document benchmarks and demonstrates robustness in out-of domain scenarios. |
Does Self-Rationalization Improve Robustness to Spurious Correlations? (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Rationalization is fundamental to human reasoning and learning. |
| Approach: | They evaluate robustness to spurious correlations in encoder-decoder and decoder-only models . authors say explanations can come at the cost of robustness . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outputs are more interpretable and easier to interact with for end-users than nonrationalizing models. |
End-to-End Self-Debiasing Framework for Robust NLU Training (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models incorporate dataset biases leading to strong performance on in-distribution test sets but poor performance on out-of-distortion (OOD) tests. |
| Approach: | They propose a debiasing framework where the shallow representations of the main model are used to derive a bias model and both models are trained simultaneously. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing approaches on three well-studied NLU tasks while still delivering high in-distribution performance. |
Using Natural Language Explanations to Improve Robustness of In-context Learning (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that large language models excel in many tasks via in-context learning (ICL). However, ICL struggles to execute complex tasks such as arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose to augment ICL with natural language explanations (NLEs) to produce further NLEs on adversarial datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach yields more accurate results than zero-shot-ICL and using only human-generated NLEs on eight adversarial datasets. |
From Adversarial Arms Race to Model-centric Evaluation: Motivating a Unified Automatic Robustness Evaluation Framework (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yangyi Chen, Hongcheng Gao, Ganqu Cui, Lifan Yuan, Dehan Kong, Hanlu Wu, Ning Shi, Bo Yuan, Longtao Huang, Hui Xue, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, Heng Ji
| Challenge: | Existing models of robustness evaluation are incomprehensive, impractical, and invalid . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for automatic robustness evaluation that shifts towards model-centric evaluation to further exploit the advantages of adversarial attacks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework is based on a model-centric evaluation protocol and a robustness evaluation protocol. |
Human-in-the-loop Evaluation for Early Misinformation Detection: A Case Study of COVID-19 Treatments (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluations of human-in-the-loop systems to combat misinformation are often set up automatically using datasets that were retrospectively constructed. |
| Approach: | They propose a human-in-the-loop evaluation framework for fact-checking novel misinformation claims and identifying social media messages that support them. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework is based on modern NLP methods for human-in-the-loop fact-checking in the domain of COVID-19 treatments. |