| Challenge: | Modern neural machine translation models have shown competitive performance in benchmarks such as WMT, but there are significant issues such as robustness, domain generalization, etc. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark dataset for NMT models from the perspective of compositional generalization and quantitatively analyze the results. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well under traditional metrics, but is low in out-of-domain and low-resource conditions. |
Similar Papers
Evaluating Structural Generalization in Neural Machine Translation (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have focused on compositional generalization with semantic parsing, but it remains unclear to what extent models can translate sentences that require structural generalization. |
| Approach: | They construct a machine translation dataset that measures compositional generalization with control of words and sentence structures. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model struggle more in structural generalization than in compositional generalization. |
On Evaluating Multilingual Compositional Generalization with Translated Datasets (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a growing amount of research investigating compositional generalization in NLP is done on English . a critical semantic distortion is a limitation of the translation of datasets . |
| Approach: | They propose to translate a dataset for evaluating compositional generalization in semantic parsing. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that the translation of the MCWQ dataset suffers from semantic distortion. |
The Paradox of the Compositionality of Natural Language: A Neural Machine Translation Case Study (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Obtaining human-like performance in NLP is often argued to require compositional generalisation. |
| Approach: | They re-instantiate three compositionality tests from the literature and reformulate them for neural machine translation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models are more compositional than models trained on more data, the authors show . they also show that some non-compositional behaviours are mistakes, whereas others reflect natural variation in data. |
Categorizing Semantic Representations for Neural Machine Translation (2022.coling-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Modern neural machine translation models suffer limitation in compositional generalization, resulting in weakened translation performance on unseen compounds. |
| Approach: | They propose to introduce categorization to the contextualized representations to improve generalization by reducing sparsity and overfitting. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces compositional generalization error rates by 24% on a dedicated MT dataset. |
Compositional Generalization by Factorizing Alignment and Translation (2020.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a crucial property underlying the expressive power of human language is its systematicity. |
| Approach: | They propose to make an analogous separation between alignment and translation in neural machine translation to capture compositional structure. |
| Outcome: | The proposed architecture outperforms existing neural networks on a compositional generalization task without supervision. |
A Systematic Assessment of Syntactic Generalization in Neural Language Models (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on syntactic knowledge models has not provided a clear picture of the properties required to produce proper syntaktic generalizations. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate syntactic knowledge of language models by varying model architectures . they find substantial differences in syntaktic generalization performance by model architecture . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model architectures outperform other architectures on a set of 34 English-language syntactic test suites. |
A Survey of Domain Adaptation for Neural Machine Translation (C18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Neural machine translation (NMT) is a deep learning based approach for machine translation. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a deep learning approach to train machine translation in scenarios where large-scale parallel corpora are available. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach yields the state-of-the-art translation performance in resource rich scenarios. |
Revisiting Low-Resource Neural Machine Translation: A Case Study (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent research has shown that neural machine translation models are highly data-inefficient and underperform phrase-based statistical machine translation (PBSMT) in low-resource settings. |
| Approach: | They propose to use auxiliary data to train low-resource neural machine translation systems without auxiliary monolingual or multilingual data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods outperform PBSMT and other statistical machine translation models in Korean–English with minimal data. |
A Simple and Effective Approach to Coverage-Aware Neural Machine Translation (P18-2)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Neural Machine Translation (NMT) models are used to solve translation problems using long-term models. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to seek a better balance between model confidence and length preference for Neural Machine Translation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on Chinese-English and English-German translation tasks. |
An Effective Approach to Unsupervised Machine Translation (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent research line has managed to train both unsupervised and unsupervised machine translation systems using monolingual corpora only. |
| Approach: | They propose to use monolingual corpora to train both unsupervised and unsupervised machine translation systems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system achieves 22.5 BLEU points in English-to-German WMT 2014, 5.5 points more than the previous best unsupervised system, and 0.5 points more in the (supervised) shared task winner back in 2014. |