Challenge: Question answering (QA) tasks have been posed using a variety of formats . a new study aims to develop specialized QA models that can be used to train QA systems .
Approach: They build a pre-trained question answering model that performs well across 19 QA datasets . they argue that format-specialized models can limit the ability to teach reasoning .
Outcome: a new model that trains on QA datasets performs on par with 8 models trained on individual datasets . a single model that trained on UNIFIEDQA performs well on 19 QA data .

Similar Papers

ProQA: Structural Prompt-based Pre-training for Unified Question Answering (2022.naacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing QA research on question answering is focused on specific question types, knowledge domains, or reasoning skills.
Approach: They propose a unified QA paradigm that solves various tasks through a single model.
Outcome: The proposed model improves QA-centric ability on 11 QA benchmarks.
Open-Domain Question Answering (2020.acl-tutorials)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: tutorial provides a comprehensive overview of cutting-edge research in open-domain question answering (QA)
Approach: tutorial provides a comprehensive overview of cutting-edge research in open-domain question answering . focus will shift to cutting- edge models proposed for open- domain QA .
Outcome: The tutorial will cover cutting-edge research in open-domain question answering (QA) it will cover two-stage retriever-reader approaches, dense retriever and end-to-end training, and retriever free methods .
UnitedQA: A Hybrid Approach for Open Domain Question Answering (2021.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent work on open-domain question answering focuses on either extractive or generative readers exclusively.
Approach: They propose a hybrid approach to extractive and generative readers that leverages both models.
Outcome: The proposed approach outperforms state-of-the-art models on NaturalQuestions and TriviaQA respectively.
SEMQA: Semi-Extractive Multi-Source Question Answering (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent proposed long-form question answering systems have shown promising capabilities, but attributing and verifying their generated abstractive answers can be difficult.
Approach: They propose a task that summarises multiple sources in a semi-extractive fashion . they create a dataset with human-written semi-extractive answers to natural and generated questions .
Outcome: The proposed task summarizes multiple sources in a semi-extractive fashion and produces fine in-line attributions by-design that are easy to verify, interpret, and evaluate.
Bend but Don’t Break? Multi-Challenge Stress Test for QA Models (D19-58)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a gap remains in reasoning ability compared to a human, and performance tends to degrade when models are exposed to less-constrained tasks.
Approach: They conduct extensive qualitative and quantitative analyses on the results of four models across four datasets . they relate common errors to model capabilities and discuss a way forward .
Outcome: The proposed model performance is based on the results of four models across four datasets.
MESAQA: A Dataset for Multi-Span Contextual and Evidence-Grounded Question Answering (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing question answering systems focus on extracting answers from single spans, but real-world scenarios require synthesizing information from multiple spans.
Approach: They propose a dataset that leverages the MASH-QA dataset and large language models (LLMs) to ensure that each Q/A pair requires considering all selected spans.
Outcome: The proposed method enables the model to answer multiple Q/A pairs in a single span, while ensuring that all selected spans are considered.
MetaQA: Combining Expert Agents for Multi-Skill Question Answering (2023.eacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent explosion of question-answering datasets and models has increased interest in generalization of models across multiple domains and formats.
Approach: They propose to combine expert agents with a flexible and training-efficient architecture that considers questions, answer predictions, and answer-prediction confidence scores to select the best answer among a list of answer predictions.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms previous multi-agent and multi-dataset approaches and is highly data-efficient to train and adaptable to any QA format.
NoiseQA: Challenge Set Evaluation for User-Centric Question Answering (2021.eacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Question-Answering (QA) systems are deployed in the real world . a lack of research attention has been devoted to studying the issues that arise when people use QA systems.
Approach: They show that component components that precede an answering engine can introduce varied and considerable sources of error.
Outcome: The proposed evaluations highlight the need for QA evaluation to expand to consider real-world use.
Generalizing Question Answering System with Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuning (D19-58)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods focus on improving in-domain performance, leaving open the question of how they can generalize to out-of-domain and unseen RC tasks.
Approach: They propose a multi-task learning framework that learns the shared representation across different tasks and builds on a large pre-trained language model and fine-tuned on multiple RC datasets.
Outcome: The proposed framework improves the BERT-Large baseline by 8.39 and 7.22 respectively.
HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering (D18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing question answering (QA) datasets fail to train QA systems to perform complex reasoning and provide explanations for answers.
Approach: They propose a new dataset with 113k Wikipedia-based question-answer pairs with four key features: (1) the questions require finding and reasoning over multiple supporting documents to answer; (2) the questions are diverse and not constrained to any pre-existing knowledge bases or knowledge schemas; (3) the questions provide sentence-level supporting facts required for reasoning; and (4) a type of factoid comparison questions to test QA systems’ ability to extract relevant facts and perform necessary comparison.
Outcome: The proposed dataset has 113k Wikipedia-based question-answer pairs and four key features that make it challenging for the latest QA systems.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations