HateGAN: Adversarial Generative-Based Data Augmentation for Hate Speech Detection (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to detect online hate speech depend heavily on labeled datasets for training, which results in poor detection performance of the hate speech class. |
| Approach: | They propose a deep generative reinforcement learning model which augments two commonly-used hate speech detection datasets with the HateGAN generated tweets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves the detection performance of hate speech class regardless of the classifiers and datasets used in the detection task. |
Similar Papers
A Benchmark Dataset for Learning to Intervene in Online Hate Speech (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to detect online hate speech ignore conversational context . generative hate speech intervention is a novel approach to counter online hate . |
| Approach: | They propose a task where generative hate speech intervention generates responses to intervene during online conversations that contain hate speech. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can detect and block hate speech and discourage it . it can also generate responses written by Mechanical Turk workers . |
Improving Hate Speech Detection with Deep Learning Ensembles (L18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | censorship is a potential risk when addressing these issues with automated text classification methods. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a neural network-based ensemble method to better classify hate speech using a publicly available embedding model and a popular sentiment dataset. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves by 5 points on a hate speech corpus from Twitter and a popular sentiment dataset. |
Generation-Based Data Augmentation for Offensive Language Detection: Is It Worth It? (2023.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | generative data augmentation has been shown to be effective in offensive language detection but the potential for bias injection has not been investigated. |
| Approach: | They propose to investigate the robustness of models trained on generated data in a variety of data augmentation setups and analyze models using the HateCheck suite. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model training setups on four English offensive language datasets are robust and robust, while the generative DA setups do not present bias injection issues. |
HARALD: Augmenting Hate Speech Data Sets with Real Data (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Hate speech detection depends on the availability of variable labeled data. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that uses real unlabelled data from online platforms to augment existing models by harvesting and processing it. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves the classification performance of hate speech classification models. |
Exploring Data Augmentation Strategies for Hate Speech Detection in Roman Urdu (2022.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a number of social media platforms are generating hateful content, a new study finds . augmentation techniques are needed to improve the performance of the models . |
| Approach: | They evaluate different data augmentation techniques for the improvement of hate speech detection in Roman Urdu. |
| Outcome: | The proposed techniques improve hate speech detection in Roman Urdu on two datasets. |
Data-Efficient Methods For Improving Hate Speech Detection (2023.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for hate speech detection are data-hungry and require large datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose an input-level data augmentation technique EasyMix to improve hate speech detection in english and multilingual datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the performance across english and multilingual datasets by 1% and 2-8%. |
Leveraging Intra-User and Inter-User Representation Learning for Automated Hate Speech Detection (N18-2)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods that focus on a single tweet as input are likely to yield high false positive and negative rates. |
| Approach: | They propose a model that leverages intra-user and inter-user representation learning to improve hate speech detection on Twitter by suppressing the noise in a single Tweet. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model significantly improves the f-score of a strong bidirectional LSTM model by 10.1%. |
Playing the Part of the Sharp Bully: Generating Adversarial Examples for Implicit Hate Speech Detection (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing algorithms for hate speech detection focus on explicit forms of hate speech, but they fail to properly detect subtle and implicit HS messages. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for generating adversarial implicit HS short-text messages using Auto-regressive language models and a strategy to group the generated messages in complexity levels. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework shows that iteratively retraining on HARD messages significantly improves implicit HS benchmarks. |
Improving Adversarial Data Collection by Supporting Annotators: Lessons from GAHD, a German Hate Speech Dataset (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Hate speech detection models are only as good as the data they are trained on, but adversarial datasets are slow and costly . data sourced from social media suffer from systematic gaps and biases, leading to unreliable models with simplistic decision boundaries. |
| Approach: | They propose a German Adversarial Hate speech Dataset comprising 11k examples . they explore new strategies for supporting annotators and provide manual analysis of disagreements for each strategy . |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset is challenging even for state-of-the-art hate speech detection models and it significantly improves model robustness. |
Hatemoji: A Test Suite and Adversarially-Generated Dataset for Benchmarking and Detecting Emoji-Based Hate (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models for detecting hate expressed with emojis have weaknesses when used for sensitive applications such as content moderation. |
| Approach: | They propose a test suite of 3,930 short-form statements that evaluates hateful language expressed with emoji. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better on emoji-based hate while maintaining strong performance on text-only hate. |