Challenge: Existing methods to detect online hate speech ignore conversational context . generative hate speech intervention is a novel approach to counter online hate .
Approach: They propose a task where generative hate speech intervention generates responses to intervene during online conversations that contain hate speech.
Outcome: The proposed method can detect and block hate speech and discourage it . it can also generate responses written by Mechanical Turk workers .

Similar Papers

Generating Counter Narratives against Online Hate Speech: Data and Strategies (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Hate Speech (HS) is a pervasive issue that spreads quickly and widely . research has focused on avoiding undesired effects that come with content moderation .
Approach: They propose to use large scale unsupervised language models to generate responses to hate effectively using large scale models.
Outcome: The proposed methods lack quality data and produce generic/repetitive responses.
HateGAN: Adversarial Generative-Based Data Augmentation for Hate Speech Detection (2020.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to detect online hate speech depend heavily on labeled datasets for training, which results in poor detection performance of the hate speech class.
Approach: They propose a deep generative reinforcement learning model which augments two commonly-used hate speech detection datasets with the HateGAN generated tweets.
Outcome: The proposed model improves the detection performance of hate speech class regardless of the classifiers and datasets used in the detection task.
Directions for NLP Practices Applied to Online Hate Speech Detection (2022.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to address hate speech in online spaces have relied on conventions and practices from NLP.
Approach: They argue that many conventions in NLP are poorly suited for the problem and encourage researchers to develop methods that are more appropriate for the task.
Outcome: The proposed methods are poorly suited for the problem and should be adapted to address the propagation of online harms.
Uncovering the Root of Hate Speech: A Dataset for Identifying Hate Instigating Speech (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a lack of comprehensive datasets specifically annotated for hate instigating speech hinders research . lack of reliable models for hate triggering makes it difficult to apply off-the-shelf models to the problem.
Approach: They propose to use a multilingual dataset to identify hate instigating speech . lack of comprehensive datasets specifically annotated for hate instigators hinders their work .
Outcome: The proposed dataset identifies hate instigating speech across languages . lack of comprehensive datasets makes it difficult to train and evaluate models .
Improving Hate Speech Detection with Deep Learning Ensembles (L18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: censorship is a potential risk when addressing these issues with automated text classification methods.
Approach: They propose to use a neural network-based ensemble method to better classify hate speech using a publicly available embedding model and a popular sentiment dataset.
Outcome: The proposed method improves by 5 points on a hate speech corpus from Twitter and a popular sentiment dataset.
LLM generated responses to mitigate the impact of hate speech (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a study aims to determine the effectiveness of large language models to counteract hate speech . it is the first real-life A/B test evaluating the effectiveness .
Approach: They conduct the first real-life A/B test assessing the effectiveness of LLM-generated counter-speech.
Outcome: The proposed system reduces user engagement by over 20%, the study shows . the proposed metric is based on a simple metric and is scalable to other platforms .
Countering Hateful and Offensive Speech Online - Open Challenges (2024.emnlp-tutorials)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a comprehensive understanding of the field is needed to maintain respectful and inclusive online environments.
Approach: This tutorial aims to provide attendees with a comprehensive understanding of the field by delving into essential dimensions such as multilingualism, counter-narrative generation, a hands-on session with one of the most popular APIs for detecting hate speech, fairness, and ethics in AI, and the use of recent advanced approaches.
Outcome: This tutorial aims to provide attendees with a comprehensive understanding of the field by delving into essential dimensions such as multilingualism, counter-narrative generation, a hands-on session with one of the most popular APIs for detecting hate speech, fairness, and ethics in AI, and the use of recent advanced approaches.
Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate Speech (2021.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on explicit or overt hate speech have failed to address a more pervasive form based on coded or indirect language.
Approach: They propose a theoretically-justified taxonomy of implicit hate speech and a benchmark corpus with fine-grained labels for each message and its implication.
Outcome: The proposed dataset will serve as a useful benchmark for understanding this multifaceted issue.
Leveraging Intra-User and Inter-User Representation Learning for Automated Hate Speech Detection (N18-2)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods that focus on a single tweet as input are likely to yield high false positive and negative rates.
Approach: They propose a model that leverages intra-user and inter-user representation learning to improve hate speech detection on Twitter by suppressing the noise in a single Tweet.
Outcome: The proposed model significantly improves the f-score of a strong bidirectional LSTM model by 10.1%.
Integrating Argumentation and Hate-Speech-based Techniques for Countering Misinformation (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: scalable strategies to combat online misinformation are short-term and insufficient, authors say . current reactive approaches, like content flagging and banning, do little to change perception of misinformants . human evaluations show that our framework generates expert-like responses .
Approach: They propose a framework that generates persuasive responses from hate-speech counter-responses . human evaluations show that the framework generates expert-like responses .
Outcome: The proposed framework generates expert-like responses and is 14% more engaging, 21% more natural, and 18% more factual than the best available alternatives.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations