Reference and Document Aware Semantic Evaluation Methods for Korean Language Summarization (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
Dongyub Lee, Myeong Cheol Shin, Taesun Whang, Seungwoo Cho, Byeongil Ko, Daniel Lee, EungGyun Kim, Jaechoon Jo
| Challenge: | Existing methods for text summarization are based on recall-oriented understudy for gisting evaluation (ROUGE) scores do not reflect semantic meaning correspondences between generated and reference summaries. |
| Approach: | They propose to use Korean as a summarization language to generate a shorter form of text from the source document preserving salient information. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation metrics improve the correlation between the metrics and human judgment. |
Similar Papers
An Anchor-Based Automatic Evaluation Metric for Document Summarization (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing reference-based evaluation metrics such as ROUGE have their own drawbacks. |
| Approach: | They propose a protocol for a reference-based automatic evaluation metric that requires the endorsement of source document. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric is anchored on source document and has higher correlation with human judgments. |
Reference-free Summarization Evaluation via Semantic Correlation and Compression Ratio (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation metrics for summarization use human annotations as reference. |
| Approach: | They propose a new automatic reference-free evaluation metric that compares semantic distribution between source document and summary by pretrained language models and considers summary compression ratio. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric is more consistent with human evaluation in terms of coherence, consistency, relevance and fluency. |
A Training-free and Reference-free Summarization Evaluation Metric via Centrality-weighted Relevance and Self-referenced Redundancy (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation metrics for text summarization systems are expensive and time-consuming. |
| Approach: | They propose a training-free and reference-free summarization evaluation metric that incorporates a centrality-weighted relevance score and a self-referenced redundancy score. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation metric outperforms existing methods on multi-document and single-document summarization evaluation. |
Revisiting Automatic Evaluation of Extractive Summarization Task: Can We Do Better than ROUGE? (2022.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to evaluate text summarization tasks using ROUGE have been criticized for lack of semantic understanding. |
| Approach: | They propose a semantic-aware metric for extractive summarization task that is semantic-based . they use CNN/DailyMail dataset to study the new metric . |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric is semantic-aware and shows higher correlation with human judgement and yields a large number of disagreements with the original ROUGE metric. |
A Graph-theoretic Summary Evaluation for ROUGE (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | ROUGE is one of the most widely used evaluation metrics for text summarization. |
| Approach: | They propose to use ROUGE to evaluate summaries based on lexical and semantic similarities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves ROUGE's correlation with human judgments by exploiting lexical and semantic similarities. |
QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluation (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Thomas Scialom, Paul-Alexis Dray, Sylvain Lamprier, Benjamin Piwowarski, Jacopo Staiano, Alex Wang, Patrick Gallinari
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation metrics for summarization evaluation are limited and do not correlate well with human judgments. |
| Approach: | They propose to extend existing evaluation metrics to include question answering models to assess whether a summary contains all relevant information in its source document. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework significantly improves the correlation with human judgments over four evaluation dimensions. |
Unsupervised Reference-Free Summary Quality Evaluation via Contrastive Learning (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for document summarization consider the informativeness of the assessed summary and require human-generated references for each test summary. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate summary qualities without reference summaries by unsupervised contrastive learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms other evaluation metrics even without reference summaries. |
SEM-F1: an Automatic Way for Semantic Evaluation of Multi-Narrative Overlap Summaries at Scale (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work has introduced an important yet relatively under-explored NLP task called Semantic Overlap Summarization (SOS) that entails generating a summary from multiple alternative narratives which conveys the common information provided by those narratives. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a sentence-level precision-recall style automated evaluation metric to evaluate a new NLP task called Semantic Overlap Summarization (SOS) they propose to employ the popular ROUGE metric and use it to compare the two tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric yields higher correlation with human judgment and higher inter-rater agreement compared to the existing metric. |
Re-Evaluating Evaluation for Multilingual Summarization (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Jessica Forde, Ruochen Zhang, Lintang Sutawika, Alham Aji, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Genta Winata, Minghao Wu, Carsten Eickhoff, Stella Biderman, Ellie Pavlick
| Challenge: | Existing studies have shown that automated evaluation approaches correlate with human ratings in English, but this is unclear for other languages. |
| Approach: | They construct a small-scale pilot dataset containing article-summary pairs and human ratings in English, Chinese and Indonesian to measure the strength of summaries. |
| Outcome: | The results show that standard metrics are unreliable measures of quality in Chinese and Indonesian. |
SueNes: A Weakly Supervised Approach to Evaluating Single-Document Summarization via Negative Sampling (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on automatic summary evaluation metrics focus on lexical similarity and require a reference summary which is expensive to obtain. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a weakly supervised summary evaluation approach without the presence of reference summaries to transform existing summarization datasets into corrupted reference summarizers. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms baselines and shows that it improves linguistic quality over all metrics. |