Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summaries (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing automatic evaluation metrics for summarization are insensitive to factual inconsistencies. |
| Approach: | They propose an automatic evaluation protocol that detects factual inconsistencies in a model-generated summary. |
| Outcome: | QAGS has higher correlations with human judgments of factual consistency than other evaluation metrics. |
Similar Papers
Q2: Evaluating Factual Consistency in Knowledge-Grounded Dialogues via Question Generation and Question Answering (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods for factual consistency in knowledge-grounded dialogues are unreliable and limit their applicability. |
| Approach: | They propose an automatic evaluation metric for factual consistency in knowledge-grounded dialogue using automatic question generation and question answering. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation metric consistently shows higher correlation with human judgements. |
Improving Factual Consistency of Abstractive Summarization via Question Answering (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Feng Nan, Cicero Nogueira dos Santos, Henghui Zhu, Patrick Ng, Kathleen McKeown, Ramesh Nallapati, Dejiao Zhang, Zhiguo Wang, Andrew O. Arnold, Bing Xiang
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that about 30% of summaries generated by neural text summarization suffer from fact fabrication. |
| Approach: | They propose an automatic evaluation metric to measure factual consistency and a learning algorithm that maximizes the metric during model training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves factual consistency and overall quality of summarization models. |
TRUE: Re-evaluating Factual Consistency Evaluation (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
Or Honovich, Roee Aharoni, Jonathan Herzig, Hagai Taitelbaum, Doron Kukliansy, Vered Cohen, Thomas Scialom, Idan Szpektor, Avinatan Hassidim, Yossi Matias
| Challenge: | Grounded text generation systems often generate factual inconsistencies, hindering their real-world applicability. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to assess factual consistency metrics on standardized texts . they recommend NLI and question generation-and-answering-based methods as starting points . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is more actionable and interpretable than previous methods. |
Questioning the Validity of Summarization Datasets and Improving Their Factual Consistency (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization systems have a lack of a defined definition for the task . factual consistency is a key factor in summarizing, but there are still deficiencies . a new study shows that summarized summarisation models achieve improved performance . |
| Approach: | They propose a filtered summarization dataset with improved factual consistency to address this problem . they argue that the dataset should become a valid benchmark for developing and evaluating summarizing systems . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on a popular summarization dataset with improved factual consistency. |
Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a weakly-supervised approach is needed to verify factual consistency . auxiliary span extraction tasks are useful for verifying factual consistent summaries . |
| Approach: | They propose a weakly-supervised approach for verifying factual consistency . they transfer the model to summaries generated by several neural models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms models trained with strong supervision on source documents and human evaluations. |
Verify with Caution: The Pitfalls of Relying on Imperfect Factuality Metrics (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have led to optimism that they can serve as reliable evaluators of natural language outputs. |
| Approach: | They propose to use factuality metrics to evaluate natural language outputs . they find they misestimate the factual accuracy of NLG systems . |
| Outcome: | The proposed metrics are inconsistent with each other and often misestimate the factual accuracy of NLG systems, causing biases against paraphrased outputs and outputs that draw upon faraway parts of the source documents. |
QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarization (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on text summarization factual consistency are divided into two categories . entailment-based and question answering-based metrics are the most efficient . |
| Approach: | They propose an optimized QA-based metric that improves factual consistency by 14% . they compare entailment-based and QA metrics to find the best fit . |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric outperforms the best performing entailment-based metric on the SummaC factual consistency benchmark. |
Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metrics (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Modern summarization models generate fluent but often factually unreliable outputs. |
| Approach: | They propose to use human annotations to identify different categories of factual errors and benchmark factuality metrics to improve summarization evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method identifies the proportion of different categories of factual errors and benchmarks their human judgements as well as their specific strengths and weaknesses. |
Investigating Crowdsourcing Protocols for Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Summaries (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
Xiangru Tang, Alexander Fabbri, Haoran Li, Ziming Mao, Griffin Adams, Borui Wang, Asli Celikyilmaz, Yashar Mehdad, Dragomir Radev
| Challenge: | Existing pre-trained summarization models produce text that is factually inconsistent with the input. |
| Approach: | They present a scale-based scale for Likert rating and a scoring algorithm for Best-Worst Scaling to improve crowdsourcing reliability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is more reliable than existing models on two news summarization datasets. |
Multilingual Summarization with Factual Consistency Evaluation (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization models generate factually inconsistent summaries, reducing their utility for real-world applications. |
| Approach: | They propose to use data filtering and controlled generation to detect hallucinations in machine generated summaries. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models detect factual inconsistencies in machine generated summaries, but they focus on English only. |