Investigating Crowdsourcing Protocols for Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Summaries (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
Xiangru Tang, Alexander Fabbri, Haoran Li, Ziming Mao, Griffin Adams, Borui Wang, Asli Celikyilmaz, Yashar Mehdad, Dragomir Radev
| Challenge: | Existing pre-trained summarization models produce text that is factually inconsistent with the input. |
| Approach: | They present a scale-based scale for Likert rating and a scoring algorithm for Best-Worst Scaling to improve crowdsourcing reliability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is more reliable than existing models on two news summarization datasets. |
Similar Papers
Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a weakly-supervised approach is needed to verify factual consistency . auxiliary span extraction tasks are useful for verifying factual consistent summaries . |
| Approach: | They propose a weakly-supervised approach for verifying factual consistency . they transfer the model to summaries generated by several neural models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms models trained with strong supervision on source documents and human evaluations. |
Questioning the Validity of Summarization Datasets and Improving Their Factual Consistency (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization systems have a lack of a defined definition for the task . factual consistency is a key factor in summarizing, but there are still deficiencies . a new study shows that summarized summarisation models achieve improved performance . |
| Approach: | They propose a filtered summarization dataset with improved factual consistency to address this problem . they argue that the dataset should become a valid benchmark for developing and evaluating summarizing systems . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on a popular summarization dataset with improved factual consistency. |
SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluation (2021.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
Alexander R. Fabbri, Wojciech Kryściński, Bryan McCann, Caiming Xiong, Richard Socher, Dragomir Radev
| Challenge: | a lack of comprehensive studies on evaluation metrics for text summarization hinders progress . a new study aims to improve evaluation metrics that correlate with human judgments . |
| Approach: | They propose to re-evaluate automatic evaluation metrics and share a toolkit for evaluation . they hope to promote a more complete evaluation protocol for text summarization . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation metrics are inconsistent with existing evaluation protocols. |
A Tale of Evaluating Factual Consistency: Case Study on Long Document Summarization Evaluation (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Despite the recent progress for summarization models in producing fluent summaries, they still encounter challenges when long sequences of generated texts and inputs (over thousands of words) need to be evaluated. |
| Approach: | They conduct a systematic analysis of factual-consistency evaluation systems across four long-document datasets and examine the relationship between sentence-level and summary-level model performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can achieve higher recall in error detection for older summaries, yet struggle with false positives and fine-grained error detection. |
Improving Factual Consistency of Abstractive Summarization via Question Answering (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Feng Nan, Cicero Nogueira dos Santos, Henghui Zhu, Patrick Ng, Kathleen McKeown, Ramesh Nallapati, Dejiao Zhang, Zhiguo Wang, Andrew O. Arnold, Bing Xiang
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that about 30% of summaries generated by neural text summarization suffer from fact fabrication. |
| Approach: | They propose an automatic evaluation metric to measure factual consistency and a learning algorithm that maximizes the metric during model training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves factual consistency and overall quality of summarization models. |
Gradient-Based Adversarial Factual Consistency Evaluation for Abstractive Summarization (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization models often produce inconsistent statements or false facts. |
| Approach: | They propose an efficient weak-supervised adversarial data augmentation approach to generate factual consistency datasets by backpropagating gradients on token embeddings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can make interpretable factual errors tracing on public datasets and is cost-effective. |
Ranking Generated Summaries by Correctness: An Interesting but Challenging Application for Natural Language Inference (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances on abstractive summarization have led to fluent summaries, but factual errors in generated summary still severely limit their use in practice. |
| Approach: | They evaluate summaries produced by state-of-the-art models via crowdsourcing and show that factual errors occur frequently. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can detect errors and reduce them by reranking alternative summaries. |
Understanding Factual Errors in Summarization: Errors, Summarizers, Datasets, Error Detectors (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Liyan Tang, Tanya Goyal, Alex Fabbri, Philippe Laban, Jiacheng Xu, Semih Yavuz, Wojciech Kryscinski, Justin Rousseau, Greg Durrett
| Challenge: | Abstractive summarization systems still include factual errors in generated summaries despite recent improvements in factuality detection . |
| Approach: | They aggregate factuality error annotations from nine existing datasets and stratify them according to the underlying summarization model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves on the ChatGPT-based model and shows that it is not superior for all error types. |
Annotating and Modeling Fine-grained Factuality in Summarization (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent abstractive summarization systems produce factual errors that are not faithful to the input . current methods are lacking in identifying what errors are most important to target . |
| Approach: | They use synthetic and human-labeled data to identify factual errors in summarization and train models on the factuality detection task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model detects factual errors on word, dependency, and sentence levels. |
Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metrics (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Modern summarization models generate fluent but often factually unreliable outputs. |
| Approach: | They propose to use human annotations to identify different categories of factual errors and benchmark factuality metrics to improve summarization evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method identifies the proportion of different categories of factual errors and benchmarks their human judgements as well as their specific strengths and weaknesses. |