On Importance Sampling-Based Evaluation of Latent Language Models (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to evaluate language models using latent structures are intractable as they require marginalizing over the latent space. |
| Approach: | They propose to use importance sampling to evaluate latent language models . they elucidate subtle differences in how importance sampling is applied . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better on tasks requiring structure and interpretability. |
Similar Papers
What Matters to an LLM? Behavioral and Computational Evidences from Summarization (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly entrusted with the management of information. |
| Approach: | They combine behavioral and computational analyses to find out what LLMs prioritize . they generate length-controlled summaries and derive empirical importance distributions . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model converges on consistent importance patterns and clusters more by family than by size. |
Latent Structure Models for Natural Language Processing (P19-4)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Latent structure models are a powerful tool for compositional data modeling and pipelines. |
| Approach: | This tutorial will cover recent advances in discrete latent structure models . it will discuss their motivation, potential, and limitations . |
| Outcome: | This tutorial will cover recent advances in discrete latent structure models . it will discuss their motivation, potential, and limitations . |
A Systematic Survey and Critical Review on Evaluating Large Language Models: Challenges, Limitations, and Recommendations (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Sawsan Alqahtani, M Saiful Bari, Mizanur Rahman, Mohammad Abdullah Matin Khan, Haidar Khan, Israt Jahan, Amran Bhuiyan, Chee Wei Tan, Md Rizwan Parvez, Enamul Hoque, Shafiq Joty, Jimmy Huang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained significant attention due to their capabilities in performing diverse tasks across domains. |
| Approach: | They review the primary challenges and limitations causing inconsistencies in evaluations . early models could generate coherent text but limited to simple tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluations are reproducible, reliable, and robust. |
Cognitive Effects and Biases in Large Language Models (2026.eacl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial bridges psychology and NLP to clarify cognitive effects and biases in large language models. |
| Approach: | This tutorial bridges psychology and NLP to clarify cognitive effects and biases in large language models. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial bridges psychology and NLP to clarify cognitive effects and biases in large language models. |
Fundamental Capabilities of Large Language Models and their Applications in Domain Scenarios: A Survey (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jiawei Li, Yizhe Yang, Yu Bai, Xiaofeng Zhou, Yinghao Li, Huashan Sun, Yuhang Liu, Xingpeng Si, Yuhao Ye, Yixiao Wu, 林一冠 林一冠, Bin Xu, Ren Bowen, Chong Feng, Yang Gao, Heyan Huang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmark-based evaluations cannot accurately reflect the performance of real-world applications. |
| Approach: | They propose a reliable strategy for domains to choose more robust LLMs for real-world applications. |
| Outcome: | The proposed strategy addresses the challenges faced by domains to choose more robust LLMs for real-world applications. |
On Evaluating LLMs’ Capabilities as Functional Approximators: A Bayesian Evaluation Framework (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the way we can formulate tasks in text-in-text-out format. |
| Approach: | They propose a new evaluation framework to comprehensively assess LLMs’ function modeling abilities by adopting a Bayesian perspective of function modeling. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation framework enables LLMs to excel in utilizing prior knowledge to develop a strong understanding of the underlying function. |
The Trade-offs of Domain Adaptation for Neural Language Models (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Neural Language Models (LMs) trained on large generic training sets have been shown to be effective at adapting to smaller, specific target domains for language modeling and other downstream tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for a Neural Language Models (LM) to be presented in a common framework. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework highlights similarities and subtle differences between adaptation techniques and the framework. |
NormXLogit: The Head-on-Top Never Lies (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | NormXLogit is a novel approach for assessing the significance of input tokens based on word embeddings . |
| Approach: | They propose a novel method for assessing the significance of input tokens based on the input and output representations associated with each token. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms gradient-based methods in faithfulness and offers competitive performance compared to leading architecture-specific techniques. |
Assessing the Capabilities of Large Language Models in Coreference: An Evaluation (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are a new approach to coreference resolution, but their performance is not yet fully understood. |
| Approach: | They propose that future efforts should improve scope, data, and evaluation methods of traditional coreference research to adapt to the development of LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve scope, data, and evaluation methods of traditional coreference research to adapt to the development of LLMs. |
Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and Challenges (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | introducing Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened new avenues for assessing generated content quality, e.g., coherence, creativity, and context relevance. |
| Approach: | They propose a taxonomy for organizing existing LLM-based evaluation metrics and a structured framework to understand and compare them. |
| Outcome: | The proposed taxonomy offers a framework to understand and compare LLM-based evaluation methods. |