Papers by Yating Wu

11 papers
QUDeval: The Evaluation of Questions Under Discussion Discourse Parsing (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation metrics poorly approximate parser quality, says a new study . questions under discussion is a linguistic framework that views discourse as asking questions and answering them .
Approach: They propose a framework for automatic evaluation of QUD parsing . they use a dataset of fine-grained evaluation of 2,190 QUD questions .
Outcome: The proposed framework shows that satisfying constraints of QUD is still challenging for modern LLMs.
De-Biased Court’s View Generation with Causality (2020.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches to court’s view generation can be used to address this problem, but neglecting the confounding bias in data can limit the model performance and pollute learning outcomes.
Approach: They propose a novel Attentional and Counterfactual based Natural Language Generation method consisting of an attentional encoder and a pair of innovative counterfactual decoders to generate judgment-discriminative court's views.
Outcome: The proposed method is able to generate judgment-discriminative court's views (both supportive and non-supportive views) under both quantitative and qualitative evaluation metrics.
Towards Interactivity and Interpretability: A Rationale-based Legal Judgment Prediction Framework (2022.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing models lack interpretability due to the neglect of rationale in the prediction process.
Approach: They propose a rationale-based legal judgment prediction framework that follows the judge's real trial logic and provides good interactivity and interpretability.
Outcome: The proposed framework provides good interactivity and interpretability which enables practical use.
Discourse Analysis via Questions and Answers: Parsing Dependency Structures of Questions Under Discussion (2023.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing discourse formalisms require large taxonomies of discourse relations to be accurate.
Approach: They propose a linguistic framework for discourse analysis using questions under discussion . they propose qUD parser that derives a dependency structure of questions over full documents .
Outcome: The proposed model is trained on a large, crowdsourced question-answering dataset.
Unleashing the Power of LLMs in Court View Generation by Stimulating Internal Knowledge and Incorporating External Knowledge (2024.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) have made remarkable strides in language generation, but they encounter difficulties in the knowledge-intensive legal domain.
Approach: They propose to decompose court views into different parts, stimulate internal knowledge, and incorporate external information to unleash the power of LLMs in the task.
Outcome: The proposed method generates more accurate and reliable court views on two real-world datasets LAIC2021 and CJO2022.
Which questions should I answer? Salience Prediction of Inquisitive Questions (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent work in NLP has taken advantage of question generation capabilities of LLMs to enhance a wide range of applications.
Approach: They propose a salience predictor for inquisitive questions that is instruction-tuned . they show that highly salient questions are empirically more likely to be answered in the same article .
Outcome: The proposed model is based on linguist-annotated salience scores of 1,766 questions . it shows that answering salient questions improves comprehension of the text .
Precedent-Enhanced Legal Judgment Prediction with LLM and Domain-Model Collaboration (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in deep learning have enabled a variety of techniques to be used to solve the LJP task.
Approach: They propose a framework that leverages the strength of both LLMs and domain-specific models in the context of precedents.
Outcome: The proposed framework leverages the strength of both LLM and domain models in the context of precedents.
CDD: A Large Scale Dataset for Legal Intelligence Research (2023.emnlp-industry)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent research has focused on predicting crimes, predicting outcomes of judicial debates, and extracting information from legal documents.
Approach: They propose to use a large-size Court Debate Dataset to analyze court debates . they invite experienced judges to design appropriate labels for data records .
Outcome: The proposed dataset includes 30,481 court cases, totaling 1,144,425 utterances.
Exploiting Contrastive Learning and Numerical Evidence for Confusing Legal Judgment Prediction (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies fail to distinguish different classification errors with a standard cross-entropy classification loss and ignore the numbers in the fact description for predicting the term of penalty.
Approach: They propose to extract crime amounts from fact description and use them to learn distinguishable representations to exploit the numbers in the fact description for predicting the term of penalty.
Outcome: The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art results on real-world datasets and ablation studies demonstrate the effectiveness of each component.
Focus-aware Response Generation in Inquiry Conversation (2023.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on response generation focus on relevance and fluency, rarely paying attention to the focus.
Approach: They propose a Focus-aware response generation method that takes the focus into consideration and optimizes a multi-level encoder and focal decoder to generate multiple candidate responses.
Outcome: The proposed method generates candidate responses that correspond to different focuses and performs better on two orthogonal inquiry conversation datasets.
Elaborative Simplification as Implicit Questions Under Discussion (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Automated text simplification is often thought of as a monolingual translation task . this view fails to account for elaborative simplification, where new information is added into the simplified text.
Approach: They propose to view elaborative simplification through the lens of the Question Under Discussion framework . they propose to model 1.3K elongations accompanied by implicit QUDs to investigate what writers elaborate upon .
Outcome: The proposed framework provides a robust way to investigate what writers elaborate upon, how they elaborate, and how elaborations fit into the discourse context.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations