Papers by Weiqi Sun
Compositional Task-Oriented Parsing as Abstractive Question Answering (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Task-oriented parsing (TOP) aims to convert natural language into machine-readable representations of specific tasks, such as setting an alarm. |
| Approach: | They propose to reduce TOP to abstractive question answering by using canonical paraphrasing to generate linearized parse trees. |
| Outcome: | The proposed technique outperforms state-of-the-art methods in full-data settings while achieving dramatic improvements in few-shot settings. |
Text-Tuple-Table: Towards Information Integration in Text-to-Table Generation via Global Tuple Extraction (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to condensing textual information into concise and structured tables are limited in their applicability in broader contexts. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark dataset for generating summary tables of competitions based on real-time commentary texts that incorporates large-scale textual information into concise and structured tables. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method exhibits strong generalization abilities, surpassing previous approaches on several other text-to-table datasets. |
CLAIMCHECK: How Grounded are LLM Critiques of Scientific Papers? (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Jiefu Ou, William Gantt Walden, Kate Sanders, Zhengping Jiang, Kaiser Sun, Jeffrey Cheng, William Jurayj, Miriam Wanner, Shaobo Liang, Candice Morgan, Seunghoon Han, Weiqi Wang, Chandler May, Hannah Recknor, Daniel Khashabi, Benjamin Van Durme
| Challenge: | CLAIMCHECK is an annotated dataset of NeurIPS 2023 and 2024 submissions and reviews from OpenReview. |
| Approach: | They annotate NeurIPS 2023 and 2024 submissions and reviews for weaknesses and dispute them for fine-grained labels of validity, objectivity, and type of the identified weaknesses. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset is richly annotated by ML experts for weaknesses statements in the reviews and the claims that they dispute, as well as fine-grained labels of validity, objectivity, and type of the identified weaknesses. |