Papers by Shirui Luo
Beyond Memorization: A Rigorous Evaluation Framework for Medical Knowledge Editing (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing knowledge editing methods show promising results on general-domain benchmarks, but their effectiveness in the medical domain remains largely unexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate medical knowledge editing using model-generated rationales as editing targets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves editing efficacy and generalization in medical models without full retraining. |
MedQPA-Gen: Medical Question Proposing and Answering for Report Generation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Weijie Liang, Xiyue Zhu, Ruike Zhu, Chenhao Li, Cheng Tang, Zhiyu Liu, Zhihua Gong, Shirui Luo, Yudu Li, Volodymyr Kindratenko
| Challenge: | Existing training paradigms fail to explicitly target factual accuracy, resulting in inaccuracies and serious patient safety risks. |
| Approach: | They propose an automatic and generalizable report evaluation technique that uses question proposing and answering to enable controllable, structured reasoning grounded in medical domain knowledge and the factual correctness of the report. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can improve human preference scores and perform better on downstream tasks. |
LexGenius: An Expert-Level Benchmark for Large Language Models in Legal General Intelligence (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Wenjin Liu, Haoran Luo, Xin Feng, Xiang Ji, Lijuan Zhou, Rui Mao, Jiapu Wang, Shirui Pan, Erik Cambria
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for legal general intelligence (GI) are result-oriented and do not evaluate the legal intelligence of large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a Chinese legal benchmark for evaluating legal GI in large language models . they use recent legal cases and exam questions to create multiple-choice questions . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks lack a systematic evaluation of the legal intelligence of large language models (LLMs) the results show that even the best LLMs lagging behind human legal professionals. |