Papers by Jingxuan Fan
User-Assistant Bias in LLMs (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Modern large language models are typically trained using structured role tags . asymmetries in training data associated with different role tags can potentially introduce inductive biases. |
| Approach: | They propose a task-agnostic benchmark to test user–assistant bias in large language models . they find human-preference alignment amplifies user bias, reasoning fine-tuning reduces it . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark tests show that most instruction-tuned models exhibit strong user bias . human-preference alignment amplifies user bias, while reasoning fine-tuning reduces it. |
Training Verifier to Assessing Complex Real-World Tool-Use Trajectories (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Linzhuang Sun, Mingyang Chen, Hao Liang, Tianpeng Li, Zhou Yijie, Chenzheng Zhu, Tianyu Guo, Huanyao Zhang, Jingxuan Wei, Bihui Yu, Fan Yang, Wentao Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing methods for training effective AI agents often resort to synthetic data generation. |
| Approach: | They propose a plug-and-play framework for data quality control in tool-use scenarios . they construct a tool-verify dataset and release a benchmark to assess its performance . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework surpasses Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct on Tool-V-Bench and the previous APIGen-MT dataset. |
MM-Verify: Enhancing Multimodal Reasoning with Chain-of-Thought Verification (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | MM-Verifier and MM Reasoner are a powerful multimodal reasoning model . large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance across tasks spanning myriad domains. |
| Approach: | They propose a method which combines tree search and verification to generate high-quality chain-of-thought data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms all larger models on the MathCheck, MathVista, and MathVerse benchmarks. |