Papers by James Hendler
Are Human Explanations Always Helpful? Towards Objective Evaluation of Human Natural Language Explanations (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Human-annotated labels and explanations are critical for training explainable NLP models. |
| Approach: | They propose a metric that measures the usefulness of an explanation for model performance at both fine-tuning and inference. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric can evaluate the quality of human-annotated explanations, while Simulatability falls short. |
Beyond Labels: Empowering Human Annotators with Natural Language Explanations through a Novel Active-Learning Architecture (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Bingsheng Yao, Ishan Jindal, Lucian Popa, Yannis Katsis, Sayan Ghosh, Lihong He, Yuxuan Lu, Shashank Srivastava, Yunyao Li, James Hendler, Dakuo Wang
| Challenge: | Existing low-resource learning techniques focus on label annotation while neglecting the natural language explanation of a data point. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel architecture that leverages an explanation-generation model to produce explanations guided by human explanations and a prediction model that utilizes generated explanations toward prediction faithfully. |
| Outcome: | The proposed architecture produces explanations guided by human explanations, a prediction model that utilizes generated explanations toward prediction faithfully, and a data diversity-based AL sampling strategy that benefits from the explanation annotations. |
More Samples or More Prompts? Exploring Effective Few-Shot In-Context Learning for LLMs with In-Context Sampling (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Bingsheng Yao, Guiming Chen, Ruishi Zou, Yuxuan Lu, Jiachen Li, Shao Zhang, Yisi Sang, Sijia Liu, James Hendler, Dakuo Wang
| Challenge: | Existing studies on LLM prompting focus on selecting a better set of data samples inside one single prompt input, but why not design and leverage multiple ICL prompts together to further improve the LLM’s performance? |
| Approach: | They propose a low-resource LLM prompting technique to optimize the construction of multiple ICL prompt inputs to produce confident predictions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed technique can produce confident predictions by optimizing the construction of multiple ICL prompt inputs on four NLI datasets and one QA dataset. |