Papers by Chengzhi Liu
MMRC: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Understanding Multimodal Large Language Model in Real-World Conversation (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Haochen Xue, Feilong Tang, Ming Hu, Yexin Liu, Qidong Huang, Yulong Li, Chengzhi Liu, Zhongxing Xu, Chong Zhang, Chun-Mei Feng, Yutong Xie, Imran Razzak, Zongyuan Ge, Jionglong Su, Junjun He, Yu Qiao
| Challenge: | Existing multimodal large language models lack the ability to memorize, recall, and reason in sustained interactions. |
| Approach: | They propose a multimodal real-world conversation benchmark for evaluating open-ended abilities of multimodal large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks show that the models perform better in open-ended conversations. |
What Language Do Non-English-Centric Large Language Models Think in? (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Chengzhi Zhong, Qianying Liu, Fei Cheng, Junfeng Jiang, Zhen Wan, Chenhui Chu, Yugo Murawaki, Sadao Kurohashi
| Challenge: | Despite their robust performance in English, these models often exhibit reduced proficiency in non-English languages, and their outputs may reflect an inherent bias toward English-centric perspectives. |
| Approach: | They categorize non-English-centric large language models into two groups: CPMs and BLMs, which are pre-trained on a balanced mix of multiple languages from scratch. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models exhibit a pronounced internal preference for English tokens when projected into the vocabulary space. |
Language Lives in Sparse Dimensions: Toward Interpretable and Efficient Multilingual Control for Large Language Models (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior studies show that large language models map multilingual content into English-aligned representations at intermediate layers before projecting them back into target-language token spaces in the later layers. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to identify and manipulate dimensions that are sparse and sparsity-based . they propose to use as few as 50 sentences of either parallel or monolingual data to manipulate these dimensions . |
| Outcome: | Experiments on a multilingual generation control task show the interpretability of these dimensions. |
Lost in the Context: Insufficient and Distracted Attention to Contexts in Preference Modeling (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Shihan Dou, Jiayi Chen, Chenhao Huang, Feng Chen, Wei Chengzhi, Huiyuan Zheng, Shichun Liu, Yan Liu, Chenxiao Liu, Chao Xin, Lin Yan, Zongzhang Zhang, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Existing reward models concatenate contexts and responses, but they often ignore crucial segments of the context that are important for evaluating the response quality. |
| Approach: | They propose a reward model that evaluates the response quality based on a given context and assigns a rewards reward. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework significantly improves preference modeling by increasing attention to relevant information within the context and achieves better generalizability. |
Can LLMs See Without Pixels? Benchmarking Spatial Intelligence from Textual Descriptions (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Zhongbin Guo, Zhen Yang, Yushan Li, Xinyue Zhang, Wenyu Gao, Jiacheng Wang, Chengzhi Li, Xiangrui Liu, Ping Jian
| Challenge: | Existing advances in Spatial Intelligence rely on vision-Language Models . however, a critical question remains: does spatial understanding originate from visual encoders? |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate the SI performance of Large Language Models without pixel-level input. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark challenges large language models to perform symbolic reasoning rather than visual pattern matching. |