Second-Order Semantic Dependency Parsing with End-to-End Neural Networks (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to semantic dependency parsing are graph-based and transition-based. |
| Approach: | They propose a second-order semantic dependency parser which takes relationships between two or more edges into account. |
| Outcome: | The proposed algorithm outperforms existing approaches to parsing on graph-based approaches. |
Similar Papers
Second-Order Neural Dependency Parsing with Message Passing and End-to-End Training (2020.aacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to dependency parsing use exact and approximate inference to find the best parse tree. |
| Approach: | They propose a second-order graph-based neural dependency parsing approach using message passing and end-to-end neural networks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods match the state-of-the-art second-order graph-based neural dependency parsers and have significantly faster speed in training and testing. |
Semantic Dependency Parsing with Edge GNNs (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing semantic dependency parsers use factor graphs to generate a tree structure, but they are ill-suited for a more complex semantic relationship representation. |
| Approach: | They propose a second-order neural CRF parser that uses factor graphs to generate a dependency edge and define neighbors in terms of sibling, co-parent, and grandparent relationships. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the first-order biaffine parser on English datasets and shows that it is more efficient than the first order. |
Graph-based Dependency Parsing with Graph Neural Networks (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In graph-based dependency parsers, learning representations is gaining in importance, and we use graph neural networks to learn the representations. |
| Approach: | They propose to use graph neural networks to learn dependency tree nodes and propose to add a new aggregation function to the system. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves the best UAS and LAS on PTB (96.0%, 94.3%) without using external resources. |
Semi-Supervised Semantic Dependency Parsing Using CRF Autoencoders (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Semantic dependency parsing allows words to have multiple dependency heads, resulting in graph-structured representations. |
| Approach: | They propose an approach to semi-supervised learning of semantic dependency parsers based on the CRF autoencoder framework. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves over the baseline model and is arc-factored. |
Second-Order Unsupervised Neural Dependency Parsing (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | supervised dependency parsers can reach a very high accuracy, but they require treebanks for training. |
| Approach: | They propose a second-order extension of unsupervised neural dependency models that incorporate grandparent-child or sibling information. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 10% improvement over the previous state-of-the-art model on the full WSJ dataset. |
Simpler but More Accurate Semantic Dependency Parsing (P18-2)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Syntactic dependency parsing is the most popular method for automatically extracting low-level relationships between words in a sentence. |
| Approach: | They extend a syntactic dependency parser to train on and generate graph-structured representations that capture between-word relationships that are more closely related to the meaning of a sentence. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system beats the current state-of-the-art system by 0.6% and linguistically richer representations push the margin even higher. |
Efficient Second-Order TreeCRF for Neural Dependency Parsing (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In the deep learning (DL) era, dependency parsing models are extremely simplified with little hurt on performance thanks to the remarkable capability of multi-layer BiLSTMs in context representation. |
| Approach: | They propose to extend the biaffine parser to a second-order TreeCRF extension to reduce the complexity of the inside-outside algorithm. |
| Outcome: | The proposed extension can be used to batchify the inside and Viterbi algorithms and avoid the complex outside algorithm via efficient back-propagation. |
AMR dependency parsing with a typed semantic algebra (P18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstract Meaning Representations (AMRs) are graphs which describe the predicate-argument structure of a sentence. |
| Approach: | They propose a semantic parser which parses strings into tree representations of the compositional structure of an AMR graph. |
| Outcome: | The proposed parser outperforms baselines and standard neural techniques for supertagging and dependency tree parsing. |
A Graph-Based Neural Model for End-to-End Frame Semantic Parsing (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies focus on frame semantic parsing as a graph construction problem. |
| Approach: | They propose an end-to-end neural model to tackle frame semantic parsing jointly. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is highly competitive and performs better than pipeline models on two benchmark datasets. |
Exploiting the Syntax-Model Consistency for Neural Relation Extraction (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing deep learning models for Relation Extraction (RE) have limited generalization beyond the syntactic structures of the input sentences. |
| Approach: | They propose a deep learning model that uses dependency trees to extract syntactic importance of words for Relation Extraction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models on three RE benchmark datasets. |