An Empirical Study of Building a Strong Baseline for Constituency Parsing (P18-2)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Sequence-to-sequence models have been used for natural language generation tasks such as machine translation and summarization. |
| Approach: | They propose to build a strong baseline based on general purpose sequence-to-sequence models for constituency parsing. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models in natural language generation tasks without any explicit task-specific knowledge or architecture of constituent parsing. |
Similar Papers
What’s Going On in Neural Constituency Parsers? An Analysis (N18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a number of differences have emerged between classical and modern constituency parsing approaches . structural components like grammars and feature-rich lexicons are becoming less central . recurrent neural networks have gained traction as a powerful and general purpose tool for representation . |
| Approach: | They propose a model that implicitly learns to encode much of the same information as grammars and lexicons in the past. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art models under similar conditions. |
Challenges to Open-Domain Constituency Parsing (2022.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing findings on cross-domain constituency parsing are only made on a limited number of domains. |
| Approach: | They manually annotate a high-quality constituency treebank containing five domains and analyze challenges to open-domain constituency parsing using a set of linguistic features. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model significantly improves the performance of the proposed model on the domain-variant features. |
On Parsing as Tagging (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to reduce constituency parsing to tagging are based on linearization, learning, and decoding . linearization of the derivation tree is the most critical factor in achieving accurate parsers as taggers . |
| Approach: | They propose a pipeline with three steps for reducing constituency parsing to tagging . they find that linearization and learning are critical factors for accurate parsers . |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipelines are linearized, learning, and decoded, and have three steps to achieve accurate parsing as taggers. |
A Simple and Strong Baseline for End-to-End Neural RST-style Discourse Parsing (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing discourse parsing methods need a strong baseline for reporting reliable experimental results. |
| Approach: | They integrate existing parsing strategies with transformer-based pre-trained language models to provide a strong baseline for reporting reliable experimental results. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the current best model using DeBERTa. |
An Empirical Comparison of Unsupervised Constituency Parsing Methods (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for unsupervised constituency parsing are inconsistent due to data preprocessing, lexicalization, and evaluation metrics. |
| Approach: | They propose to standardize experimental settings for better comparability between methods . they compare existing methods with those proposed by decade-old models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods perform better than decade-old models on English and Japanese, respectively, compared with decade- old models. |
On the Role of Supervision in Unsupervised Constituency Parsing (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work on unsupervised constituency parsing uses labeled examples for tuning . a few-shot parser with labeles can outperform other approaches by a significant margin . |
| Approach: | They propose to use as few labeled examples as possible for model development . they propose to train existing models on the same labeles they access . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms other models on the WSJ development set by a significant margin . the proposed model can be further improved by augmentation and self-training . |
Straight to the Tree: Constituency Parsing with Neural Syntactic Distance (P18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Compared to traditional shift-reduce parsing schemes, our approach is free from the potentially disastrous compounding error. |
| Approach: | They propose a model that predicts a scalar for each split position in a sentence and then determines the topology of grammar tree based on syntactic distances. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves the state-of-the-art single model F1 score of 92.1 on PTB and 86.4 on CTB dataset, surpassing the previous single model results by a large margin. |
Top-down Discourse Parsing via Sequence Labelling (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Discourse analysis is a systematic way to understand how texts are segmented hierarchically into discourse units. |
| Approach: | They propose a top-down approach to discourse parsing that is conceptually simpler than its predecessors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model eliminates the decoder and reduces the search space for splitting points. |
Revisiting the Practical Effectiveness of Constituency Parse Extraction from Pre-trained Language Models (2022.coling-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Constituency Parse Extraction from Pre-trained Language Models (CPE-PLM) is a new paradigm that attempts to induce constituency parse trees based on the internal knowledge of pre-tried language models. |
| Approach: | They propose to use constituency parse trees from pre-trained language models to induce constituency trees by introducing a set of heterogeneous PLMs combined using two advanced ensemble methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach is more effective than typical supervised parsers in few-shot settings. |
Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on New Frontiers in Summarization (D19-54)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | EMNLP 2017 is a workshop on enhancing natural language processing's ability to produce concise, fluent summaries. |
| Approach: | the workshop provides a forum for cross-fertilization of ideas towards automatic summarization . four invited speakers will be present at the workshop . |
| Outcome: | the workshop aims to provide a forum for cross-fertilization of ideas towards automatic summarization. |