| Challenge: | Existing approaches to reduce constituency parsing to tagging are based on linearization, learning, and decoding . linearization of the derivation tree is the most critical factor in achieving accurate parsers as taggers . |
| Approach: | They propose a pipeline with three steps for reducing constituency parsing to tagging . they find that linearization and learning are critical factors for accurate parsers . |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipelines are linearized, learning, and decoded, and have three steps to achieve accurate parsing as taggers. |
Similar Papers
Tetra-Tagging: Word-Synchronous Parsing with Linear-Time Inference (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using custom architectures, constituency parsers are limited and require specialized hardware. |
| Approach: | They propose an algorithm that assigns labels to each word in a sentence in parallel and then performs a reconciliation phase to extract a tree in (empirically) linear time. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 95.4 F1 on the WSJ test set while also achieving substantial speedups compared to current state-of-the-art parsers with comparable accuracies. |
An Empirical Study of Building a Strong Baseline for Constituency Parsing (P18-2)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Sequence-to-sequence models have been used for natural language generation tasks such as machine translation and summarization. |
| Approach: | They propose to build a strong baseline based on general purpose sequence-to-sequence models for constituency parsing. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models in natural language generation tasks without any explicit task-specific knowledge or architecture of constituent parsing. |
Parsing linearizations appreciate PoS tags - but some are fussy about errors (2022.aacl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work on the impact of PoS tags on graph- and transition-based parsers suggests that they are only useful when tagging accuracy is prohibitively high or in low-resource scenarios. |
| Approach: | They examine the impact of PoS tags on graph- and transition-based parsers and propose to use them in a new paradigm for sequence labeling. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is best when tagging accuracy and resource availability are high. |
Better, Faster, Stronger Sequence Tagging Constituent Parsers (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing efforts to speed up constituent parsing have focused on chart-based or shift-reduce parsers. |
| Approach: | They propose to use auxiliary losses and sentence-level fine-tuning to mitigate greedy decoding issues. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model surpasses the performance of sequence tagging constituent parsers on the English and Chinese Penn Treebank datasets and reduces their parsing time even further. |
Parsing as Tagging (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for dependency parsing treat parse as tagging, but they are not perfect. |
| Approach: | They propose a simple yet accurate method that treats parsing as tagging . they use a sequence model with a bidirectional LSTM over BERT embeddings . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art method on universal dependency (UD) by 1.76% unlabeled attachment score (UAS) for English, 1.98% UAS for French, and 1.16% UAS in German. |
Parsing Headed Constituencies (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using constituency and dependency trees, syntactic representations are preferred for tasks such as nominal phrase extraction and identification of terminology. |
| Approach: | They propose a parsing technique that generates headed constituency trees which combine information typically contained in constituency and dependency trees. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method generates headed constituency trees with discontinuities and can generate constituency tree with discontinuity. |
Efficient Constituency Parsing by Pointing (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Constituency parsing is a core task in natural language processing (NLP) Existing methods for constituency paring are greedy transition-based or globally optimized. |
| Approach: | They propose a constituency parsing model that casts the problem into a series of pointing tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 92.78 F1 without pre-trained models, which is faster than existing models. |
Revisiting Supertagging for faster HPSG parsing (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new supertagger for HPSG-based treebanks is used to improve parsing speed and accuracy. |
| Approach: | They propose to integrate the best supertagger into an HPSG-based parser and compare it to an existing system. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system achieves 97.26% accuracy on 950 sentences from WSJ23 and 93.88% on the out-of-domain technical essay The Cathedral and the Bazaar. |
Unsupervised Parsing via Constituency Tests (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for unsupervised parsing rely on constituency tests . linguists can judge a sentence's grammatical validity by modifying it via some transformation . |
| Approach: | They propose a method for unsupervised parsing based on a constituency test . they specify a set of transformations and use an unsupervised neural acceptability model to make grammaticality decisions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves 62.8 F1 on the Penn Treebank test set, an improvement of 7.6 points over the previous best results. |
Focal Training and Tagger Decouple for Grammatical Error Correction (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) are categorized into sequence-to-sequence approaches, tagging-based approaches, and hybrid approaches. |
| Approach: | They propose to decouple error detection layer from label tagging layer and to down-weight label imbalance and tabbing entanglement loss using Focal Loss. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods are effective over three latest Chinese Grammatical Error Correction datasets. |