Automatic Academic Paper Rating Based on Modularized Hierarchical Convolutional Neural Network (P18-2)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to rate academic papers require a lot of feature engineering and can cause inequality. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a novel convolutional neural network to automatically rate academic papers . they propose to build a dataset to automatically determine whether to accept academic papers. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baselines by a large margin. |
Similar Papers
Hierarchical Bi-Directional Self-Attention Networks for Paper Review Rating Recommendation (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for review rating prediction ignore hierarchies among data . paper review rating predictions are important for improving paper review process . |
| Approach: | They propose a Hierarchical bi-directional self-attention Network framework for paper review rating prediction and recommendation . they leverage hierarchical structure of paper reviews with three levels of encoders . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach can be used to make an effective decision-making tool for the academic paper review process. |
TDNN: A Two-stage Deep Neural Network for Prompt-independent Automated Essay Scoring (P18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing automated essay scoring (AES) models rely on rated essays for the target prompt as training data. |
| Approach: | They propose a shallow deep neural network to learn a prompt-dependent rating model using rated essays for non-target prompts as training data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on the standard ASAP dataset. |
Multi-task Learning for Automated Essay Scoring with Sentiment Analysis (2020.aacl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Automated Essay Scoring (AES) is a process that aims to alleviate the workload of graders and improve the feedback cycle in educational systems. |
| Approach: | They propose to combine two tasks, sentiment analysis and AES by utilizing multi-task learning to combine sentiment features extracted from opinion expressions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model produces a QWK of 0.763 on the Automated StudentAssessment Prize (ASAP) benchmark. |
Automated Essay Scoring via Pairwise Contrastive Regression (2022.coling-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to automate essay scoring use regression or ranking objectives . a novel neural pairwise ranking model is developed to optimize both objectives based on the same loss . |
| Approach: | They propose a novel Neural Pairwise Contrastive Regression model that optimizes both objectives simultaneously as a single loss. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms previous methods on the public Automated Student Assessment Prize dataset. |
Aggregating Multiple Heuristic Signals as Supervision for Unsupervised Automated Essay Scoring (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Automated Essay Scoring (AES) aims to evaluate the quality score of input essays without human intervention. |
| Approach: | They propose an unsupervised approach to evaluate the quality of input essays . they use multiple heuristic quality signals as pseudo-groundtruths to train a neural AES model . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on eight prompts of ASPA dataset compared with previous unsupervised methods . |
Bloom-Eval: A Hierarchical Evaluation Benchmark for Automatic Survey Generation Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evaluation methods suffer from cognitive dimensional simplification and methodological unreliability due to the ”LLM-as-a-Judge” approach. |
| Approach: | They propose a six-tiered benchmark that evaluates ASG systems by prioritizing deterministic algorithms and introducing a GRADE approach for abstract abilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method provides the ASG field with a systematic, reproducible, and theoretically grounded benchmark to guide future research. |
Analytic Automated Essay Scoring Based on Deep Neural Networks Integrating Multidimensional Item Response Theory (2022.coling-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Essay exams have two drawbacks in that grading them is expensive and raises questions about fairness. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a multidimensional item response theory model to improve interpretability while maintaining scoring accuracy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves interpretability while maintaining accuracy while preserving cost and accuracy. |
Experiments with Convolutional Neural Networks for Multi-Label Authorship Attribution (L18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for authorship attribution tasks are difficult, but they are effective. |
| Approach: | They propose a CNN that averaging author probability distributions at sentence level for longer documents and treating smaller documents as sentences adapts to single-label datasets and various document sizes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art models on a single-label AA benchmark dataset. |
DeepSentiPeer: Harnessing Sentiment in Review Texts to Recommend Peer Review Decisions (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing peer review system is not straightforward and requires domain knowledge, expertise, and intelligence of human reviewers, which is somewhat elusive with the current state of AI. |
| Approach: | They propose to use peer review texts to predict acceptance or rejection of a manuscript based on reviewer sentiment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed deep neural architecture achieves significant performance improvement over baselines (29% error reduction) in a recently released dataset of peer reviews. |
A Hierarchical Neural Attention-based Text Classifier (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing hierarchical classification models are unable to handle large corpora and the number of categories increases with increasing corpus. |
| Approach: | They propose to use external knowledge to introduce a hierarchical neural attention-based classifier to help with the classification of documents. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better than or comparable to state-of-the-art hierarchical models at significantly lower computational cost while maintaining high interpretability. |